Author | Thread |
|
09/18/2013 02:32:31 PM · #1 |
I want to get a ND filter, but I need it quickly before heading out on a trip. B&H and adorama are shut down for the holidays, and some sellers through amazon sound like they won't really ship for a couple of days, so even if I do expedited shipping, it might not go out in time.
Two questions:
1. If I'm shooting waterfalls, what ND filter strength should I get?
2. Where can I buy it from and get it by Saturday?
|
|
|
09/18/2013 03:12:00 PM · #2 |
Originally posted by vawendy: Where can I buy it from and get it by Saturday? |
Any camera store within one day's drive? ;-)
I don't have another online merchant suggestion, but if you happen to have two polarizer filters you can stack them to achieve much the same effect -- in the crude experimental examples here I was able to achieve (slight under-)exposures of up to four seconds in full daylight. |
|
|
09/18/2013 03:12:13 PM · #3 |
It will depend upon how bright the scene is to begin with. I use a Hoya ND8 that works for general stuff, but there have been times I've wanted to drag the shutter more. Having said that, it's probably the most generally useful ND (IMO). It cuts 3 stops of light. I've used Cameta in the past and the service was good.
How much of an ND you'll need will depend upon how bright you expect your ambient to be and what aperture you're intending to use, and you may be interested in something like a 9 stop ND, but this will be of limited use for other things (I use my ND filter for cutting light while maintaining an open aperture, but 9 stops is a bit much for most of my applications in that sense) |
|
|
09/18/2013 03:47:42 PM · #4 |
Originally posted by GeneralE: Originally posted by vawendy: Where can I buy it from and get it by Saturday? |
Any camera store within one day's drive? ;-)
I don't have another online merchant suggestion, but if you happen to have two polarizer filters you can stack them to achieve much the same effect -- in the crude experimental examples here I was able to achieve (slight under-)exposures of up to four seconds in full daylight. |
Nope -- the problem is that my lenses are all 77mm, and the camera stores don't seem to stock that size. :(
So the nearest camera store that may have one is over an hour away. (Small town, here.) |
|
|
09/18/2013 03:50:56 PM · #5 |
whoa... 9 stops? Didn't know they came that high!
I'm still trying to figure out the .6 .9 1.2 8, 12, 16 stuff. Some say .9 is three stops, some say it's 4 stops. Some descriptions say 12 is three some say 4. I'm not quite sure what it all means, but I'm thinking a 1.2 or 16?
(Only have one polarizer....) |
|
|
09/18/2013 03:53:27 PM · #6 |
Depending on the speed of the water and the amount of blur you desire your shutter speed is going to need to be in the area of 0.5 seconds to 2.5 seconds.
Let's say your are in bright sun light, proper exposure using Sunny 16 would put you at f/16 with a shutter speed of 1/125. So you need to cut 6 stops to get to 0.5 seconds and 8-1/3 to get to 2.5 seconds.
If it is over cast you would be around f/8 at 1/125. If you set your aperture to f/16 that gets you two stops so your ND filter would need to be in the 4 to 6 stop range.
Seems like a 6 stop ND would work for most situations and then just adjust your aperture to get desired shutter length.
I hope my math is correct here, can somebody verify?
FYI... I remember someone (I think it was BearMusic) posting a method for achieving a similar result by stacking multiple photos.
|
|
|
09/18/2013 04:09:13 PM · #7 |
Stop by a local car detail shop and ask for some scrap window tint. Put that over the lens and secure with a rubber band. Boom, ND filter. |
|
|
09/18/2013 04:22:12 PM · #8 |
|
|
09/18/2013 04:29:09 PM · #9 |
Once you find what you want order from Amazon. You can have it by Friday. |
|
|
09/18/2013 04:34:16 PM · #10 |
Found the post, it was by Kirbic.
It is here |
|
|
09/18/2013 04:37:48 PM · #11 |
2filters.com - great service, great place. But they may be closed already today. |
|
|
09/18/2013 04:46:12 PM · #12 |
Originally posted by MarkB: Once you find what you want order from Amazon. You can have it by Friday. |
I was having a hard time finding the stronger ones on amazon -- they were sold by third party dealers that didn't ship right away.
Ended up buying a 6 and a 3, figuring I could stack them. I found a 10, and was wondering if it would be too much, and if I'd regret it. Probably should have done that instead, but we'll see what happens.
It's kind of strange, though. It was hard to find anything over 3. I looked at midwest photo, calumet, richmond camera, and a bunch of other camera stores from which you could order online, but they seemed to stop at 3 with the 77mm.
Well, the 6 and 3 will give me something to play with. Thanks for the info, everyone! |
|
|
09/18/2013 06:05:45 PM · #13 |
I bought this variable one from Henry's a year and a half ago and have been pleased with the results. The variable nature gives some options for adjusting exposure length.
Couple of examples.
Middle Cove Beach
Hog's Back Falls
The second was taken in fairly bright daylight. |
|
|
09/18/2013 07:00:53 PM · #14 |
I think you'll be fine with the 6-stop and 3-stop combination. Remember, if you need more exposure time but can't get it, you can always stack in post, per my instructions in the thread linked by Mark. When you are stacking the filters, be careful of flare and ghosting, it can get bad, you've got a lot of surfaces there.
Message edited by author 2013-09-18 19:01:07. |
|
|
09/18/2013 08:46:09 PM · #15 |
You coulda' just asked ME, Wendy :-) We'll have some along... I have a Cokin split ND even... |
|
|
09/18/2013 08:46:09 PM · #16 |
dbl pst
Message edited by author 2013-09-18 20:46:40. |
|
|
09/18/2013 10:44:22 PM · #17 |
Which lens are you planning on using??? |
|
|
09/18/2013 10:44:43 PM · #18 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music: dbl pst |
glad to know I'm not the only one...sigh |
|
|
09/18/2013 10:53:35 PM · #19 |
Your going to want to probably use your 70-300mm or your 28-135mm. Most of these falls are pretty open. All have good shade, but then we've been hitting them in the afternoons. I've been using my 18-270mm with a .6 NG Filter. So far getting pretty good results (IMO). If you use your 100-400mm you will loose quite a bit in the wide view (not sure if I'm saying that right)...you will want to get more of the "big" picture. Some isolation works but most of these falls are tighter (how close you are to the falls) and smaller. Kind of like the ones in VA that we saw. |
|
|
09/19/2013 12:25:34 AM · #20 |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/07/2025 06:41:24 PM EDT.