| Author | Thread |
|
|
03/31/2013 05:34:22 PM · #51 |
|
|
|
04/01/2013 08:00:39 AM · #52 |
Week 2 Results, first number is the first week score and second is the cumulative for both weeks, teams are sorted highest to lowest score.
Western:
NAKED PEDESTRIANS ,3.50,7.00,
TEAM FIMMTAN ,3.50,5.50,
DEAD PIXEL SOCIETY ,3.50,5.00,
HOCUS FOCUS ,3.50,4.00,
SHOOT HAPPENS ,0.00,3.00,
LIGHTBENDERS ,0.50,2.50,
TRISKAIDEKAPHOBIA ,0.50,2.50,
DOMIN 8 ,0.00,0.50,
Eastern:
FOTONUTS ,3.50,7.00,
THE FLASHERS ,3.00,6.50,
ELYSIUM ,3.00,4.50,
LUCKY SEVENS ,0.50,4.00,
DODGE & THE BURNOUTS ,2.00,4.00,
VUJA DE ,2.00,2.00,
ABSTRAKT ,0.50,1.00,
TEN'S 6 ,0.00,0.00, |
|
|
|
04/01/2013 08:23:02 AM · #53 |
Well, that explains that - was not sure about the 5% Differential.
Congrats to Naked Pedestrians for the win - it was a very close and hard race. 1 point difference!
Naked Pedestrians - 352% points
Hocus Focus 351% points |
|
|
|
04/01/2013 08:24:10 AM · #54 |
wait, i got a red and Lydia got 4th place and we got no points except our bonus??? when the highest placement on the other team was 5th?
|
|
|
|
04/01/2013 08:51:13 AM · #55 |
Originally posted by mike_311:
wait, i got a red and Lydia got 4th place and we got no points except our bonus??? when the highest placement on the other team was 5th? |
According to the code these were the scores, let me know if there is any inconsistencies.
HOCUS FOCUS,0.50,LydiaToo,mike_311,CNovack,mariuca, 97.66,97.06,85.94,70.31
NAKED PEDESTRIANS,3.50,jagar,PennyStreet,colorcarnival,Yandrosxx, 94.53,92.97,84.38,80.47 |
|
|
|
04/01/2013 09:22:36 AM · #56 |
Originally posted by Epsi:
Originally posted by mike_311:
wait, i got a red and Lydia got 4th place and we got no points except our bonus??? when the highest placement on the other team was 5th? |
According to the code these were the scores, let me know if there is any inconsistencies.
HOCUS FOCUS,0.50,LydiaToo,mike_311,CNovack,mariuca, 97.66,97.06,85.94,70.31
NAKED PEDESTRIANS,3.50,jagar,PennyStreet,colorcarnival,Yandrosxx, 94.53,92.97,84.38,80.47 |
So, basically the top 3 comparisons ended in a tie and the 4th comparison resulted in win (tie-breaker) to NAKED PEDESTRIANS (80.47 versus 70.31). Yes? |
|
|
|
04/01/2013 09:35:59 AM · #57 |
Originally posted by mike_311:
wait, i got a red and Lydia got 4th place and we got no points except our bonus??? when the highest placement on the other team was 5th? |
Sucks, don't it.
:) |
|
|
|
04/01/2013 09:43:05 AM · #58 |
Originally posted by pamb:
Originally posted by mike_311:
wait, i got a red and Lydia got 4th place and we got no points except our bonus??? when the highest placement on the other team was 5th? |
Sucks, don't it.
:) |
It's kind of bittersweet actually. You do your darn best and the opposing team does push you to do your absolute best. For it to come down to 1 percentage point it is a combination of "Damn, they played a great game' and "Arrrrghhhhh, so darn close, we had it".
If my memory serves correct when I was on the DPL Pirates we were sooooo close to winning one particular week (I think we had a ribbon and a HM and a top 10 in our belts during week 2 or 4) but the win was pulled by the opposite team by 3%. Frustrating I know, but the numbers have to be drawn somewhere. Any of my Pirate teammates remember the exact numbers...well bottom line that week was a hard & good fight with great percentage points but we still lost the match. |
|
|
|
04/01/2013 09:47:28 AM · #59 |
Originally posted by glad2badad:
Originally posted by Epsi:
Originally posted by mike_311:
wait, i got a red and Lydia got 4th place and we got no points except our bonus??? when the highest placement on the other team was 5th? |
According to the code these were the scores, let me know if there is any inconsistencies.
HOCUS FOCUS,0.50,LydiaToo,mike_311,CNovack,mariuca, 97.66,97.06,85.94,70.31
NAKED PEDESTRIANS,3.50,jagar,PennyStreet,colorcarnival,Yandrosxx, 94.53,92.97,84.38,80.47 |
So, basically the top 3 comparisons ended in a tie and the 4th comparison resulted in win (tie-breaker) to NAKED PEDESTRIANS (80.47 versus 70.31). Yes? |
In this case, yes. The fourth comparison with a difference of about 10% was the decisive score. |
|
|
|
04/01/2013 09:49:13 AM · #60 |
| It encourages us bottom feeders to take our best stabs because we do matter! |
|
|
|
04/01/2013 09:51:26 AM · #61 |
Originally posted by Epsi:
Originally posted by glad2badad:
Originally posted by Epsi:
Originally posted by mike_311:
wait, i got a red and Lydia got 4th place and we got no points except our bonus??? when the highest placement on the other team was 5th? |
According to the code these were the scores, let me know if there is any inconsistencies.
HOCUS FOCUS,0.50,LydiaToo,mike_311,CNovack,mariuca, 97.66,97.06,85.94,70.31
NAKED PEDESTRIANS,3.50,jagar,PennyStreet,colorcarnival,Yandrosxx, 94.53,92.97,84.38,80.47 |
So, basically the top 3 comparisons ended in a tie and the 4th comparison resulted in win (tie-breaker) to NAKED PEDESTRIANS (80.47 versus 70.31). Yes? |
In this case, yes. The fourth comparison with a difference of about 10% was the decisive score. |
To borrow a quote from Adam of Mythbusters "I reject your reality and substitute my own." :-):-)
It reads far better on a knock down, cat scratch hard fight that the match was won by a 1 point difference:-):-) |
|
|
|
04/01/2013 09:54:36 AM · #62 |
Originally posted by bohemka:
It encourages us bottom feeders to take our best stabs because we do matter! |
This is the whole point and why the scoring system is excellent.. We are just waiting for the league table format to be completed and then it will all be finished and can be run anytime we want.
If we get a good interest and teams are sticking together we will run the leagues as div1 and div2 with the top 4 from div2 going up and the bottom 4 from div1 going down every season... |
|
|
|
04/01/2013 09:57:20 AM · #63 |
| Actually I just noticed that Domin8 are plum LAST so the scoring system DOES SUCK!!! hahaha |
|
|
|
04/01/2013 10:10:53 AM · #64 |
Originally posted by CNovack:
Originally posted by pamb:
Originally posted by mike_311:
wait, i got a red and Lydia got 4th place and we got no points except our bonus??? when the highest placement on the other team was 5th? |
Sucks, don't it.
:) |
It's kind of bittersweet actually. You do your darn best and the opposing team does push you to do your absolute best. For it to come down to 1 percentage point it is a combination of "Damn, they played a great game' and "Arrrrghhhhh, so darn close, we had it".
If my memory serves correct when I was on the DPL Pirates we were sooooo close to winning one particular week (I think we had a ribbon and a HM and a top 10 in our belts during week 2 or 4) but the win was pulled by the opposite team by 3%. Frustrating I know, but the numbers have to be drawn somewhere. Any of my Pirate teammates remember the exact numbers...well bottom line that week was a hard & good fight with great percentage points but we still lost the match. |
Actually it was closer than 3%, in the DPL2 we lost to the OLY-OOPs by 1.25%
Oly-ops 86.9556
Pirates 85.6984
-------------------
Pirates Beaten by 1.2572% I call that a very close match... Great competition and great photos from both teams! |
|
|
|
04/01/2013 10:19:21 AM · #65 |
Originally posted by Hot_Pixel:
Originally posted by CNovack:
.....
If my memory serves correct when I was on the DPL Pirates we were sooooo close to winning one particular week (I think we had a ribbon and a HM and a top 10 in our belts during week 2 or 4) but the win was pulled by the opposite team by 3%. Frustrating I know, but the numbers have to be drawn somewhere. Any of my Pirate teammates remember the exact numbers...well bottom line that week was a hard & good fight with great percentage points but we still lost the match. |
Actually it was closer than 3%, in the DPL2 we lost to the OLY-OOPs by 1.25%
Oly-ops 86.9556
Pirates 85.6984
-------------------
Pirates Beaten by 1.2572% I call that a very close match... Great competition and great photos from both teams! |
Hi ya Cap'ain!!! Good to see you back at DPC:-) Thanks Rich for weighing in and giving the correct stats on that DPL match-up. |
|
|
|
04/01/2013 10:21:37 AM · #66 |
Originally posted by CNovack:
Hi ya Cap'ain!!! Good to see you back at DPC:-) Thanks Rich for weighing in and giving the correct stats on that DPL match-up. |
You are very welcome, Thanks for the welcome back. =)
Much appreciated.
|
|
|
|
04/01/2013 10:24:35 AM · #67 |
I agree that the percentages thing is probably more fair than a scores thing... but the 5% rule should take into consideration the number of entries.
For example if my opponent has an 87% in a challenge with 134 entries and I have a 92% in a challenge with only 30 entries... that seems fair to make it a tie since it was harder for my opponent to get a high percentage with so many entries. the 5% rule evens it out a bit.
But, if it's opposite... My opponent has a 92% in a challenge with 134 entries and I have an 87% in a challenge with only 30 entries, My Opponent should win. The 5% rule gives an unfair advantage to me and I should not get the tie.
That said, the rules are as they are, and I give my congratulations to Naked Pedestrians! |
|
|
|
04/01/2013 11:05:26 AM · #68 |
Originally posted by bohemka:
It encourages us bottom feeders to take our best stabs because we do matter! |
False hope is nicer than no hope at all.
|
|
|
|
04/01/2013 11:13:49 AM · #69 |
Originally posted by bohemka:
It encourages us bottom feeders to take our best stabs because we do matter! |
not quite sure I deserve the auspicious title of bottom feeder.
|
|
|
|
04/01/2013 12:28:23 PM · #70 |
Originally posted by Epsi:
Originally posted by mike_311:
wait, i got a red and Lydia got 4th place and we got no points except our bonus??? when the highest placement on the other team was 5th? |
According to the code these were the scores, let me know if there is any inconsistencies.
HOCUS FOCUS,0.50,LydiaToo,mike_311,CNovack,mariuca, 97.66,97.06,85.94,70.31
NAKED PEDESTRIANS,3.50,jagar,PennyStreet,colorcarnival,Yandrosxx, 94.53,92.97,84.38,80.47 |
Would it be that hard for you guys to post the team matchup results like this for all teams/weeks? I just ask so that we can kinda see how close things were readily since you are already pulling the data vs us going in for every team member. |
|
|
|
04/01/2013 12:33:39 PM · #71 |
i was under the impression that that the top score on one team goes against he top score on another team, as opposed to adding up the 4 highest scores.
is this not the case?
if that was the case shouldn't we have won 3-1?
Message edited by author 2013-04-01 12:34:37. |
|
|
|
04/01/2013 12:34:50 PM · #72 |
Percentage not score, within a 5% differential.
Message edited by author 2013-04-01 12:35:46. |
|
|
|
04/01/2013 12:44:46 PM · #73 |
Originally posted by mike_311:
i was under the impression that that the top score on one team goes against he top score on another team, as opposed to adding up the 4 highest scores.
|
I also thought this is how it would work? Maybe we read something wrong?
Message edited by author 2013-04-01 12:45:35. |
|
|
|
04/01/2013 12:51:06 PM · #74 |
Originally posted by mike_311:
i was under the impression that that the top score on one team goes against he top score on another team, as opposed to adding up the 4 highest scores.
is this not the case?
if that was the case shouldn't we have won 3-1? |
your top 3 and the opposing top 3 were all within 5 points of each other, so a draw each for those three. The final score was by a 10pt margin (>5) to the opposing team, so a win for them.
|
|
|
|
04/01/2013 01:01:36 PM · #75 |
Originally posted by gcoulson:
Originally posted by bohemka:
It encourages us bottom feeders to take our best stabs because we do matter! |
not quite sure I deserve the auspicious title of bottom feeder. |
I aspire to move up to bottom feeder...
One day...
|
|
