| Author | Thread |
|
|
02/24/2011 01:26:32 AM · #26 |
Not sure if this would even qualify. :) Tough challenge topic. |
|
|
|
02/24/2011 01:37:29 AM · #27 |
for me this is emotive without people...
but is it architecture? :) (my outtake for the leading lines, also from the Salk Institute) |
|
|
|
02/24/2011 10:56:19 AM · #28 |
| Well, I'm liking both those images, and I do think they'd qualify as "emotive" architecture. Maybe this should just be a SC? |
|
|
|
12/24/2011 09:48:00 AM · #29 |
|
|
|
12/24/2011 10:01:54 AM · #30 |
Originally posted by LevT:
for me this is emotive without people...
but is it architecture? :) (my outtake for the leading lines, also from the Salk Institute) |
That is definitely architecture. Architects think a lot about light and where it goes. |
|
|
|
12/24/2011 10:05:51 AM · #31 |
Originally posted by tanguera:
trying to define "posthumous style" is sort of like trying to define porn. You know it when you see it. |
Wow, how did I ever miss this thread?
I agree with those who say that "Emotive" and "Posthumous" are two different things. First of all, Dead men don't cry. Second of all, wringing emotion from a viewer is the opposite of open-ended. The only emotion I'm interested in is the tearful joy that art provides. |
|
|
|
12/24/2011 11:01:06 AM · #32 |
Originally posted by bspurgeon:
Light and tones can set a mood. Merge this with the structure.
|
+1 for the topic idea
And I like Ben's description .... call it something like - Architecture: An Emotive Art Form |
|
|
|
12/24/2011 11:05:35 AM · #33 |
Originally posted by posthumous:
Originally posted by tanguera:
trying to define "posthumous style" is sort of like trying to define porn. You know it when you see it. |
Wow, how did I ever miss this thread?
I agree with those who say that "Emotive" and "Posthumous" are two different things. First of all, Dead men don't cry. Second of all, wringing emotion from a viewer is the opposite of open-ended. The only emotion I'm interested in is the tearful joy that art provides. |
Okay, call it Art: The Joy of A Structure
Message edited by author 2011-12-24 11:05:57. |
|
|
|
12/24/2011 06:19:08 PM · #34 |
Originally posted by PennyStreet:
Originally posted by posthumous:
Originally posted by tanguera:
trying to define "posthumous style" is sort of like trying to define porn. You know it when you see it. |
Wow, how did I ever miss this thread?
I agree with those who say that "Emotive" and "Posthumous" are two different things. First of all, Dead men don't cry. Second of all, wringing emotion from a viewer is the opposite of open-ended. The only emotion I'm interested in is the tearful joy that art provides. |
Okay, call it Art: The Joy of A Structure |
now you're talking |
|
|
|
01/06/2012 12:41:48 AM · #35 |
Wow! My first challenge suggestion that's been chosen! Who'd have thunk? Just to continue clarifying for those brave and adventurous enough to pick up the gauntlet...
Originally posted by posthumous:
Architects think a lot about light and where it goes. |
This is perhaps the most succinct phrase yet to describe what I'm trying to say. Think of the light in a building as its soul, and try to capture that.
ETA - a note to the SC, if you're following this, to change the title of the thread from Posthumous to Emotive Architectural. I'll also send a ticket.
Message edited by author 2012-01-06 00:42:47. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/26/2025 04:53:33 AM EDT.
