Author | Thread |
|
10/19/2011 11:12:46 PM · #51 |
I got a comment!!!!! *Does the happy dance*. Unfortunately, they are under the assumption they know "something", but they are incorrect. Snicker! Oh well...I'm happy! |
|
|
10/20/2011 01:59:52 AM · #52 |
Votes: 68
Views: 144
Avg Vote: 4.4265
Comments: 1
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 10/20/11 01:10 am
Status: Thank you for submitting your proof file. Your submission is being reviewed by the administrators and is pending further action. |
|
|
10/20/2011 07:25:39 PM · #53 |
time to cry i was at 6.20 early door lots of praise now pahh whats the crack everyone had a bad week?
Votes: 86
Views: 170
Avg Vote: 5.3837
Comments: 2
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 10/20/11 07:10 pm |
|
|
10/20/2011 10:17:52 PM · #54 |
The voters are really pissy voting this challenge! I think the assumption that everyone thinks THEIR kid is adorable and all the others are "meh" is probably closest to the truth. (Pssst! I've got news for some of them...) If it weren't for WPL, this would have been one to stay a LONG distance away from! Mine is now up to 4.15!! Note to self: don't ever push the envelope around here. |
|
|
10/20/2011 10:22:13 PM · #55 |
Originally posted by LadyTara: Quite a few images that don't feature a baby or a toddler but show kids clearly over 3. Tut tut.
My first submission in a while isn't doing very well, alas. :-( |
Good to see you back, LadyTara! And I don't have an entry but don't feel I should vote for the same reasons mentioned here. If the subject looks to be 3 or over, I don't consider them to be a toddler. |
|
|
10/20/2011 10:23:46 PM · #56 |
Originally posted by Giles_uk: mines nose diving from a high of 6.20 to 5.55...... harsh......
time to go back and give everyone a 1 out of spite hahaha (this is a joke, for the ppl who don't understand that) |
Giving all 1s would just result in your votes getting scrubbed anyway. |
|
|
10/21/2011 07:56:03 AM · #57 |
Originally posted by snaffles: Originally posted by LadyTara: Quite a few images that don't feature a baby or a toddler but show kids clearly over 3. Tut tut.
My first submission in a while isn't doing very well, alas. :-( |
Good to see you back, LadyTara! And I don't have an entry but don't feel I should vote for the same reasons mentioned here. If the subject looks to be 3 or over, I don't consider them to be a toddler. |
Thank you Susan! :-)
I'm a bit disheartened by my image doing so poorly as it's a good quality shot (and I don't often toot my own horn!) but like many others, I seem to have fallen victim to a sweep of mean, stupidly low voters. Mine is teetering to stay above 5, booo. I reckon folk have it right when they say that people are aggresive when it comes to thinking their little one is the bestest, lol.
|
|
|
10/21/2011 10:49:24 PM · #58 |
Wow, dropped to a 4.02. Lowest score ever for me...and I didn't even know my subject, but the photo isn't THAT bad, lol. Jeez... (I have 1 comment.) |
|
|
10/21/2011 10:53:17 PM · #59 |
6.8 might be ribbon territory in this challenge. |
|
|
10/21/2011 11:02:14 PM · #60 |
Sounds like the highest score mentioned thus far. Way to go! |
|
|
10/21/2011 11:51:31 PM · #61 |
Sounds like that everyone is forgetting this is a photographic competition not a beauty contest!
Message edited by author 2011-10-22 05:07:27. |
|
|
10/22/2011 12:24:11 AM · #62 |
|
|
10/22/2011 04:20:12 AM · #63 |
down to 5.20 now a full point from the first 20 votes, yep everyone is been particularly harsh and i though i had a good image
Message edited by author 2011-10-22 04:20:56. |
|
|
10/22/2011 03:33:05 PM · #64 |
Originally posted by sulamk: Sounds like that everyone is forgetting this is a photographic competition not a beauty contest! |
Agreed.
|
|
|
10/22/2011 06:10:57 PM · #65 |
Say it isn't so...they are voting as if THESE were their children and forgetting that we are voting on the photograph not the child....*GASP*
  
Notice the nails on the last one. Nothing like this in the challenge...rofl. |
|
|
10/22/2011 06:46:29 PM · #66 |
I didn't enter the challenge, nor do I have my own kids, so no personal bias.
I actually found the overall standard of this challenge quite poor compared to any challenge in recent memory. My overall vote in the challenge was 4.5 - I don't ever remember voting a whole challenge so low. Contrast that with my average of 6.2 for Step By Step, and 5.7 for Natural Body of Water.
I see two stand out images, half a dozen other contenders, but mostly the rest really consist of photos only a mother could love. So many of them have the feel of "here's a snapshot of my kid" rather than "here's a carefully thought out and well executed photograph of a baby". It's as though the parents taking the photographs see the beauty of their children (only natural of course) and switch off thinking their work is done, but forget that they need to sell the image to the rest of us.
I know it is "basic editing" which limits options somewhat, but nonetheless, some effort is require, surely?
I set my voting benchmark at 5.5 which makes me always fall onto a choice of "above average" or "below average" for a given image - this stops me sitting on the fence settling for "average" if you follow me. You'll see after nearly 30,000 votes my voting average is almost (not quite) 5.5 which pretty much supports my position.
For whatever reason, most of the shots in the challenge, in my opinion of course, fell a good way short of average.
Not trying to rain on anyone's parade here... just hoping to someway explain why this challenge might be getting a lot of low votes.
PS - There were quite a few (again in my opinion) DNMC's which would have lowered my average mark awarded. |
|
|
10/22/2011 07:58:01 PM · #67 |
|
|
10/22/2011 08:00:09 PM · #68 |
Originally posted by nam: What's a DNMC, please? |
Does Not Meet Challenge
|
|
|
10/23/2011 12:57:57 AM · #69 |
So, you're saying there aren't any shots like those I posted, eh...*snicker*
You're using the "a face only a mother could love" defense. Yep! |
|
|
10/23/2011 06:00:22 AM · #70 |
Originally posted by bergiekat: So, you're saying there aren't any shots like those I posted, eh...*snicker*
You're using the "a face only a mother could love" defense. Yep! |
The 4 images you posted above terrify me! I see that sort of stuff akin to child abuse.. but that's another conversation :-)
A few of my friends have recently given birth, and there seems to be a big thing now about going to a local photo studio to do some "Anne Geddes" style shots. Next thing the photos are all over Facebook with everyone coo-ing over them... but in fact almost all of those so called professional shots suck, yet the parents just dont seem to see it and hand over their money willy-nilly.
Maybe it's me... perhaps I just have an aversion to babies! :-)
I did review my votes, and maybe I was voting at a particularly grumpy time. I've uprated quite a few shots, although my overall average vote didn't seem to move much - up to 4.7 |
|
|
10/23/2011 06:42:56 AM · #71 |
5.1 for mine now. thought i had a nicely executed well composed and technically nice picture with a good expression but obviously its a blurred sh1t photo of a blank wall..... some people have disliked an aspect of mine but i guess without explaing it they havent got it.
haha some right kiddy haters out there lol ;), i know its not indication but facebook feedback was good infact probably a photo normal people like wont do any good on here unless its PP'd to an inch of its life. thats the point im going to take from this challenge actually,
bring on the next challenge..... but this one to bed |
|
|
10/23/2011 07:08:50 AM · #72 |
Dr.Confuser said it all :-) |
|
|
10/23/2011 08:50:33 PM · #73 |
Originally posted by lawrysimm: Originally posted by bergiekat: So, you're saying there aren't any shots like those I posted, eh...*snicker*
You're using the "a face only a mother could love" defense. Yep! |
The 4 images you posted above terrify me! I see that sort of stuff akin to child abuse.. but that's another conversation :-) |
I completely agree! I was over exaggerating a point. Some of the kids I posted look positively plastic!!!! |
|
|
10/23/2011 10:59:55 PM · #74 |
62-7 Saints over Colts in the 4th quarter.
|
|
|
10/23/2011 11:27:02 PM · #75 |
Votes: 119
Views: 220
Avg Vote: 5.3025
Comments: 2
Originally posted by kenskid: 62-7 Saints over Colts in the 4th quarter. |
Totally Off Topic! However...
WOOOOOT!!! Who Dat! Geaux Saints.... |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/04/2025 03:39:29 PM EDT.