| Author | Thread |
|
|
03/22/2004 10:20:35 PM · #1 |
Looking to spend no more than around 500 dollars. Any suggestions? I couldnt find any reviews of any lenses :(
|
|
|
|
03/22/2004 10:29:54 PM · #2 |
i've got some posted from the canon 75-300mm f:4-5.6 III
not a great lense - but i paid $200 for it.
will upgrade eventually - and use this as a travel lense most likely
there are quite a few from it in my vermont directory.
Message edited by author 2004-03-22 22:30:19.
|
|
|
|
03/22/2004 10:35:06 PM · #3 |
I just bought the Tokina 80-400mm F4.5-5.6 72mm for around $440.00 and I like it very much so far.
All of these were shot with this lens:
//www.pbase.com/rholdensr/zoo__ft_worth_texas
And these also with a 2x converter 160-800mm
//www.pbase.com/rholdensr/lake_shots__tokina_80400mm_w_2x_160800mm
Message edited by author 2004-03-22 22:37:15.
|
|
|
|
03/22/2004 10:37:42 PM · #4 |
|
|
|
03/22/2004 10:38:15 PM · #5 |
get the 70-200 F/4L and save up for the 1.4x tele converter--
unless you intend to shoot indoor sports? |
|
|
|
03/22/2004 10:43:03 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by buzzrock:
get the 70-200 F/4L and save up for the 1.4x tele converter--
unless you intend to shoot indoor sports? |
i second that advice. |
|
|
|
03/22/2004 10:51:32 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by outofreachx:
Looking to spend no more than around 500 dollars. Any suggestions? I couldnt find any reviews of any lenses :( |
//www.photo.net/equipment/canon/300D/EOS_300D_lenses.html |
|
|
|
03/22/2004 11:12:08 PM · #8 |
Excellent article (I only say that because he agreed with my original and future lens purchases :) )
originally I got the 50mm 1.8, Then I added a 24-85 and 70-200 F4L to share filters, with a 1.4x teleconverter.
Lately I've added the 17-40 and I adore the 100mm f2.8 macro. |
|
|
|
03/23/2004 08:25:11 PM · #9 |
Thank you very much for the pictures and links
|
|
|
|
03/23/2004 08:48:55 PM · #10 |
| i have had both the sigma and canon lens and in this range, I would recommend the sigma, it has a nice macro feature and is considerably less than the canon version. I really love and use this lens a LOT. |
|
|
|
03/23/2004 10:41:28 PM · #11 |
I think I am going to go with the Canon EF 70-200/4L USM and also the Canon EF 50/1.8 II. These seem to be the lenses for which I'd really use the most. Oh yeah, and a 1.4x teleconverter :)
|
|
|
|
03/24/2004 09:01:14 PM · #12 |
Originally posted by buzzrock:
get the 70-200 F/4L and save up for the 1.4x tele converter--
unless you intend to shoot indoor sports? |
if you did plan to shoot indoor sports, what would you use?
|
|
|
|
03/24/2004 10:33:22 PM · #13 |
| 75-300 USM IS by canon is a great lens. We sell it where I work for about $453. The image stabilization is great to have, and the USM makes it faster and quieter |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/10/2025 07:30:46 PM EDT.
