Author | Thread |
|
02/28/2004 01:07:48 AM · #1 |
I finally took out the big scope (8" LX-90, F6.3 @ 2000mm) and hooked the Canon D60 to it for some prime focus shots of the moon
Here is a resized version
for the full size and a cropped version go here
Moon with D60
this is 12 images stacked with registax
James
|
|
|
02/28/2004 02:58:06 AM · #2 |
Hmmm, it doesn't look a bit like green cheese.
You can really see a lot of detail with that scope. Very nice photo.
Q. Why would you stack 12 images? Do you move the camera between shots?
|
|
|
02/28/2004 06:56:33 AM · #3 |
Originally posted by micknewton: Q. Why would you stack 12 images? Do you move the camera between shots? |
I believe 'stacking' photos helps add the detail to the picture. The camera does not need to be attached to the scope and I think you pick a point and the software does the rest. There is a thread here somewhere with more details.
I'm just about to set up my 6" Newtonian and hope there is no cloud tonight. Any tips on camera settings Michael?
edited as I forgot the reason I was here...
Great shots btw.
Message edited by author 2004-02-28 07:15:28.
|
|
|
02/28/2004 08:45:33 AM · #4 |
James, what a stunning image, terrific work. I am amazed at the resolution of the image and the detail of the lunar craters, just spectacular.
------------------------------------------------
Andi, it has been my experience to use a much higher exposure then I would have expected in order to get the best exposure results. I have used 1/60, 1/125, and 1/250 for the shutter speed and due to the nature of my set up, there is no adjustment for the aperture, which is fixed for me a f11.0. A shutter speed of 1/125th has been typical for an image similar to James' result.
By the way, I place the camera into the "spot" metering mode, which is heavily centre-weighted for a Nikon. I can not say what you need to do for the Minolta.
Please share your results with us, I am curious to see how well it works with this telescope.
|
|
|
02/28/2004 08:49:25 AM · #5 |
The moon is quite hard to expose correctly using a built in meter, but quite easy to work out what the exposure should be.
You can just use the sunny 16 rule and maybe go half a stop brighter to keep the final image slightly lighter than mid grey - after all the moon is just a big old grey rock in full sunlight. |
|
|
02/28/2004 09:33:54 AM · #6 |
Very nice.
I do have a question or two about stacking - do you focus different areas of the moon in different shots? Or is it all generally the same focus...I've found in my quickie setup that if I get the craters in focus the rest is not sharp...of course, not much is really that sharp in mine since I've been shooting through a $15 telescope by hand holding my 5050-z in super macro mode...but, to people that haven't seen your pics, mine look pretty good! |
|
|
02/28/2004 09:55:45 AM · #7 |
Really nice, But I still don`t see the Stars and Stripes firmly planted there!I am curious if any earth bound telescope could? Mount Palomar or such? Now thats optics!! |
|
|
02/28/2004 10:42:17 AM · #8 |
Originally posted by Dim7: Really nice, But I still don`t see the Stars and Stripes firmly planted there!I am curious if any earth bound telescope could? Mount Palomar or such? Now thats optics!! |
From what I have been told no earth based telescop can see the flag or other man made objects left on the moon.
and most of my shots were made using a shutter speed of 1/250 or 1/180, when the moon is full you will want to use something a bit faster.
my scope is a F/10 but I used my F6.3 focal reducer to get the entire moon in the frame of my D60, with out the reducer the moon will over fill the frame and about 1/4 of the moon is not in the shot.
No I dont focus on differet areas of the moon,I know the craters towards the outher edge are a bit out of focus on my shot.
Also I did some shots using my Sony707, I will post some samples later on
James
|
|
|
02/28/2004 12:01:07 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by Dim7: Really nice, But I still don`t see the Stars and Stripes firmly planted there!I am curious if any earth bound telescope could? Mount Palomar or such? Now thats optics!! |
Of course not...since the lunar landing prolly never happened anyway. New evidence here.
P
ps hehe |
|
|
02/28/2004 12:05:11 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by Pedro: Originally posted by Dim7: Really nice, But I still don`t see the Stars and Stripes firmly planted there!I am curious if any earth bound telescope could? Mount Palomar or such? Now thats optics!! |
Of course not...since the lunar landing prolly never happened anyway. New evidence here.
P
ps hehe |
LOL
Nice picture James!
Acording to Pedro maybe its held up there by string?LOL |
|
|
02/28/2004 05:13:33 PM · #11 |
Originally posted by Morgan:
Please share your results with us, I am curious to see how well it works with this telescope. |
Thanks for the tips Michael, too much cloud for tonight but rest assured I'll be posting when I get the chance. I'll be starting hand held and if the results look positive I'll look for a decent adapter.
|
|
|
02/28/2004 05:19:48 PM · #12 |
Is moon photography possible without fancy equipment (besides a telescope, I mean)? Can I improvise or make the equipment?
|
|
|
02/29/2004 01:55:14 PM · #13 |
Originally posted by dsidwell: Is moon photography possible without fancy equipment (besides a telescope, I mean)? Can I improvise or make the equipment? |
if you get a teleconverter you can get a decent shot of the moon, I have the sony 707 and the Sony VCL-HGD1758 teleconversion lens, and when you use the 5x zoom + digital zoom and the max image size of 5mp, plus a tripod you can get a decent shot of the moon, but you may need to take many shots and stack them to get sharper detail.
James
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 07/29/2025 07:58:59 AM EDT.