Author | Thread |
|
11/07/2009 12:07:20 AM · #1326 |
Originally posted by gaurawa: Originally posted by bspurgeon: Originally posted by gaurawa: where do you get the 'reason' for reject ? I don't seem to see any on my rejected images. |
If there is no reason/comments listed under the image, then it did not make it to member screening. I find that frustrating, but I understand they screen a lot of images. Too bad the original screener can't use the drop down menus that we see in member screening. |
thanks! I now know how much the shots sucked :( |
Can we see it?! |
|
|
11/07/2009 01:31:16 AM · #1327 |
Originally posted by bspurgeon:
Can we see it?! |
these two
  |
|
|
11/07/2009 03:08:18 PM · #1328 |
My latest rejects...15 thus far.
This one did not make it member screening, although I happen to prefer this image.
|
|
|
11/07/2009 03:50:46 PM · #1329 |
Originally posted by gaurawa: Originally posted by bspurgeon:
Can we see it?! |
these two
 |
Did you enter the second one with or without the border?
|
|
|
11/07/2009 04:52:09 PM · #1330 |
Originally posted by senor_kasper: Originally posted by gaurawa: Originally posted by bspurgeon:
Can we see it?! |
these two
 |
Did you enter the second one with or without the border? |
Without border. |
|
|
11/07/2009 05:31:10 PM · #1331 |
at least I received comments as to why. Other previous shots were just rejected.
Message edited by author 2009-11-07 17:31:45. |
|
|
11/08/2009 04:36:31 AM · #1332 |
Originally posted by gaurawa: Originally posted by bspurgeon:
Can we see it?! |
these two
 |
got some good feedback from the critique forum and an edited version got published
|
|
|
11/08/2009 11:43:10 AM · #1333 |
Originally posted by gaurawa:
got some good feedback from the critique forum and an edited version got published |
Fantastic!
I have not resubmitted any of my rejections. |
|
|
11/08/2009 12:10:32 PM · #1334 |
Rejected. :-( |
|
|
11/08/2009 02:02:14 PM · #1335 |
Originally posted by Melethia:
Rejected. :-( |
Are they crazy ? |
|
|
11/08/2009 02:05:06 PM · #1336 |
Originally posted by Jedusi: Are they crazy ? |
Definitely! |
|
|
11/08/2009 02:10:31 PM · #1337 |
The comments were interesting:
"Comments from members:
absolutely yes!!
Nice one!
Great capture ...very joyful!
I think I would have likesd a person more or less in focus, but this shouts "missing..." and that pleases me also.
Additional feedback: Of those who voted against your image, five indicated that there is a problem with sharpness, one noted disturbing objects as a weakness and one selected composition as a reason for not publishing the image."
Seeing as how there is no way I can "correct" the "problem with sharpness", I don't see any reason to submit for critique or potentially try it again. Best shot I've had in awhile, though.
Message edited by author 2009-11-08 14:10:52. |
|
|
11/08/2009 02:13:27 PM · #1338 |
Do you mind if I post a critique request here? :) I want to resubmit this reject. I think you will need to log-in for the link to work.
//1x.com/v2/#forum.php?action=viewtopicc&tid=17059
|
|
|
11/08/2009 02:16:01 PM · #1339 |
Originally posted by Melethia: The comments were interesting:
"Comments from members:
absolutely yes!!
Nice one!
Great capture ...very joyful!
I think I would have likesd a person more or less in focus, but this shouts "missing..." and that pleases me also.
Additional feedback: Of those who voted against your image, five indicated that there is a problem with sharpness, one noted disturbing objects as a weakness and one selected composition as a reason for not publishing the image."
Seeing as how there is no way I can "correct" the "problem with sharpness", I don't see any reason to submit for critique or potentially try it again. Best shot I've had in awhile, though. |
I think Hajeka has a good suggestion. Although I like it as is, maybe blur the partially in focus rider. |
|
|
11/08/2009 02:26:25 PM · #1340 |
I've never intentionally blurred anything in post processing - I think mostly because when I try to do it, it always looks fake. I'll go take a look at your critique request. |
|
|
11/09/2009 12:18:51 PM · #1341 |
well I thought this might get in as a 1x style photo but NO. haha great.
Comment from screener: Your picture has been evaluated both by the site crew and the members. The common decision was to not publish.
Comments from members:
* A great one, with a wonderful light !
Additional feedback: Of those who voted against your image, one indicated that there is a problem with editing, one noted technical quality as a weakness and one selected composition as a reason for not publishing the image. |
|
|
11/09/2009 12:23:34 PM · #1342 |
I hadn't submitted anything in a while so last week I submitted one from my NYC vacation. I was fully expecting to show it here in this thread, surprisingly it was accepted! |
|
|
11/09/2009 01:33:55 PM · #1343 |
Originally posted by AlexSaberi: well I thought this might get in as a 1x style photo but NO. haha great.
Comment from screener: Your picture has been evaluated both by the site crew and the members. The common decision was to not publish.
Comments from members:
* A great one, with a wonderful light !
Additional feedback: Of those who voted against your image, one indicated that there is a problem with editing, one noted technical quality as a weakness and one selected composition as a reason for not publishing the image. |
it seems perfect for 1x. Dark, mysterious, man with disability, etc. |
|
|
11/09/2009 01:51:18 PM · #1344 |
I put this in last night because it seemed to fit the site...not out of screening yet. We'll see.
Lost Souls

Message edited by author 2009-11-09 13:51:33.
|
|
|
11/09/2009 03:54:03 PM · #1345 |
okay, finally submitted a shot to 1x.com and am nervously awaiting judgement. will let you know.
 |
|
|
11/09/2009 05:46:44 PM · #1346 |
Originally posted by gaurawa: got some good feedback from the critique forum and an edited version got published |
They're actually pretty cool about helping out. I resubmitted this after reading the critiques when it was originally rejected. Same setup, different shot, but I was allowed to reupload the new frame and it got accepted. |
|
|
11/09/2009 05:48:09 PM · #1347 |
PS: The one thing I really love about 1x.com is the number of views vs. here. They're in the thousands!
Edit: after a short while, that is.
Message edited by author 2009-11-09 17:48:59. |
|
|
11/09/2009 06:04:22 PM · #1348 |
Originally posted by Louis: Originally posted by gaurawa: got some good feedback from the critique forum and an edited version got published |
They're actually pretty cool about helping out. I resubmitted this after reading the critiques when it was originally rejected. Same setup, different shot, but I was allowed to reupload the new frame and it got accepted. |
louis, that's a wonderful shot! already added to my 1x.com favorites :) |
|
|
11/09/2009 06:48:42 PM · #1349 |
Curious, how much re-editing are you guys comfortable with just to get approved? Is there a line?
|
|
|
11/09/2009 08:00:10 PM · #1350 |
these two (which are two of my personal all-time favorites) were rejected last week, and these two
//1x.com/v2/#photos/member/12459/29041/
//1x.com/v2/#photos/member/12459/28969/
(which are only okay in my opinion) got published this week... go figure... |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 07/20/2025 09:40:30 AM EDT.