Author | Thread |
|
04/24/2009 10:14:21 AM · #101 |
I'll probably get stoned in the market place for admitting this, but I miss Rose!
There was always SOMETHING going on.... a continuous soap opera of epic proportions.
If I was bored, I knew I could come here and find something juicy going on in the forums.
Now all I have left is to immediately think "orbs" (and hum the twilight tune) every time I see a lens flare ;-) |
|
|
04/24/2009 10:28:19 AM · #102 |
The problem that I'm having, is that I didn't see anything worse from her than I saw from others. And if she had been around that long and had managed to behave herself, maybe she was turning over a new leaf. If she had cheated with the photograph, that wouldn't be forgivable. But if she just had anger management issues and had gotten them, for the most part, under control...? |
|
|
04/24/2009 10:33:02 AM · #103 |
I think I read that her Previous behaviour had been so extreme that she was Permanently Banned. If I understand correctly, she has since attempted to circumvent that behaviour multiple times under new username/accounts.
So the Previous Behaviour Permanent Ban is the reason, and re-joining is a violation on its face, no matter what she says or does (or doesn't say or do) afterwards.
Message edited by author 2009-04-24 10:33:39. |
|
|
04/24/2009 10:33:30 AM · #104 |
comment removed
Message edited by author 2009-04-24 20:54:52. |
|
|
04/24/2009 10:42:45 AM · #105 |
Rose = the evil energizer bunny of DPC. |
|
|
04/24/2009 10:53:37 AM · #106 |
Originally posted by ShutterPug: ...it was also believed that she was not really the one taking the photos... |
She may very well have been the photographer, so let's not go down that road. The bottom line is that Rose was banned for numerous site violations and outrageously bad behavior. She has repeatedly tried to come back through duplicate accounts and direct begging, but after so many warnings and suspensions, she ran out of second chances. Plus, there's a question of integrity with editing and forum posts when the user isn't even being honest with her identity. She's essentially burned her bridges, stocked the river with crocodiles and lobbed mortars over the chasm, so any promise of good behavior is moot at this point. |
|
|
04/24/2009 10:58:52 AM · #107 |
Originally posted by scalvert: Originally posted by ShutterPug: ...it was also believed that she was not really the one taking the photos... |
She may very well have been the photographer, so let's not go down that road. The bottom line is that Rose was banned for numerous site violations and outrageously bad behavior. She has repeatedly tried to come back through duplicate accounts and direct begging, but after so many warnings and suspensions, she ran out of second chances. Plus, there's a question of integrity with editing and forum posts when the user isn't even being honest with her identity. She's essentially burned her bridges, stocked the river with crocodiles and lobbed mortars over the chasm, so any promise of good behavior is moot at this point. |
And a Rose by any other name, is just as banned... |
|
|
04/24/2009 11:07:10 AM · #108 |
Is there any way to be sure that she won't get back on? Unless I'm wrong...the only way to be sure is to check the IP of every new member. Is that possible? And if it is....can't she change providers...go to the library....go to a friends house etc?
I have a feeling we'll see the toothless one again ! |
|
|
04/24/2009 11:11:26 AM · #109 |
Originally posted by vawendy:
Ok, tell me now--how many other people that appear to be nice, helpful people are really despicable in disguise? 'fess up! |
Well.... I'm not very nice, and seldom helpful, but I am despicable!!!! |
|
|
04/24/2009 11:16:09 AM · #110 |
Originally posted by scalvert: ....Plus, there's a question of integrity .... so any promise of good behavior is moot at this point. |
The intelligent thing to do is start off at DPC with no integrity and behaving badly. That way your stock can only go up. ;-)
|
|
|
04/24/2009 11:23:07 AM · #111 |
Originally posted by Strikeslip: Originally posted by scalvert: ....Plus, there's a question of integrity .... so any promise of good behavior is moot at this point. |
The intelligent thing to do is start off at DPC with no integrity and behaving badly. That way your stock can only go up. ;-) |
I see that you are a smart man :) |
|
|
04/24/2009 12:25:50 PM · #112 |
Originally posted by scalvert: ....Plus, there's a question of integrity .... so any promise of good behavior is moot at this point. |
Originally posted by Strikeslip: The intelligent thing to do is start off at DPC with no integrity and behaving badly. That way your stock can only go up. ;-) |
Worked for me!
Like Jason said.....I could be a Rose of another type of thorny!
|
|
|
04/24/2009 12:29:49 PM · #113 |
Originally posted by scalvert: She's essentially burned her bridges, stocked the river with crocodiles and lobbed mortars over the chasm, so any promise of good behavior is moot at this point. |
lol... Love the phrasing of this.... Let me summarise; Chances for a redo are less then 50/50 :-)) |
|
|
04/24/2009 12:31:51 PM · #114 |
Originally posted by robs: Originally posted by scalvert: She's essentially burned her bridges, stocked the river with crocodiles and lobbed mortars over the chasm, so any promise of good behavior is moot at this point. |
lol... Love the phrasing of this.... Let me summarise; Chances for a redo are less then 50/50 :-)) |
ever so slightly, yes. |
|
|
04/24/2009 12:51:21 PM · #115 |
Ahhhh.... 'Cozy Garbage'.... these were the days |
|
|
04/24/2009 12:57:02 PM · #116 |
I think it's a shame. The woman is obviously not well and shouldn't be allowed to continue here but I hope she can keep up with the photography that she obviously enjoys as it may give her an outlet from whatever ails her.
|
|
|
04/24/2009 01:22:48 PM · #117 |
Originally posted by Art Roflmao: More like taking an interest in Charles Manson's prison crafts collection. (though I admittedly have six of his pieces in my underground bunker / gallery) |
Do you have his album? //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lie_(album) |
|
|
04/24/2009 01:25:55 PM · #118 |
Sounds like great timing or NOT for the Nightmare II challenge. What a nightmare for DPC. Good luck in keeping this nightmare away...sounds like it will be a recurring thing. Hope not for the DPC staff and members.
|
|
|
04/24/2009 01:39:59 PM · #119 |
damn just went through teh thread, she should so be reinstated, never laughed so much in , well all day really.
Never did like those stupid paper flowers anyways.
also edited to add: Crap, it wasn't one of the free memberships I gave out was it?? If ti was, can it be donated to someone else, or if it wasn't me, can the same thing happen to whomever did give it out?
Message edited by author 2009-04-24 13:44:38. |
|
|
04/24/2009 02:13:36 PM · #120 |
What a trip down memory lane...though I think there were some better exchanges, that one is a good example of what happened when Rose got her granny panties in a bunch. |
|
|
04/24/2009 03:05:51 PM · #121 |
Originally posted by vawendy: I'm floored and feel kinda sick. I'd been pm'ing her for the last month or so, and we'd been trading ideas, suggestions, etc. I have a 20D that I still have to sell on ebay, and was trying to figure out how to talk my husband into letting me send it to her to use for awhile. I hate being gullible.
Ok, tell me now--how many other people that appear to be nice, helpful people are really despicable in disguise? 'fess up! |
/me raises hand........sorry now I'll go hide from everyone. Oh the shame....
Matt |
|
|
04/24/2009 03:22:58 PM · #122 |
No chance of forgive and forget?
She obviously had talent to get 3 ribbons in 36 entries, and surely if this time she was a lot better behaved then maybe its time we all moved on - its seems something of a witch-hunt going on with the SC here - makes me feel somewhat uncomfortable.
And the sheep, as always, are bleating behind them.
Such a shame.
Message edited by author 2009-04-24 15:27:35. |
|
|
04/24/2009 03:30:22 PM · #123 |
Originally posted by Simms: No chance of forgive and forget?
She obviously had talent to get 3 ribbons in 36 entries, and surely if this time she was a lot better behaved then maybe its time we all moved on - its seems something of a witch-hunt going on with the SC here - makes me feel somewhat uncomfortable.
And the sheep, as always, are bleating behind them.
Such a shame. |
opinion noted.
not shared, but noted.
|
|
|
04/24/2009 03:37:31 PM · #124 |
Originally posted by PennyStreet: I think it's a shame. The woman is obviously not well and shouldn't be allowed to continue here but I hope she can keep up with the photography that she obviously enjoys as it may give her an outlet from whatever ails her. |
LOL - as far as I can tell she pretty much kept her nose clean this time. Anyway, I wont keep you, theres a bandwagon I think you need to hop onto. |
|
|
04/24/2009 03:41:40 PM · #125 |
Originally posted by Simms: Originally posted by PennyStreet: I think it's a shame. The woman is obviously not well and shouldn't be allowed to continue here but I hope she can keep up with the photography that she obviously enjoys as it may give her an outlet from whatever ails her. |
LOL - as far as I can tell she pretty much kept her nose clean this time. Anyway, I wont keep you, theres a bandwagon I think you need to hop onto. |
Given her history & propensity for lying, I suspect that her recent thread talking about having to sell her equipment to have all her teeth pulled was false. She enticed generous members to offer free items, including a free camera, under what was a false identity & possibly false pretenses. I have no sympathy for her, and am glad that SC was on it. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/15/2025 05:22:23 AM EDT.