Author | Thread |
|
03/16/2009 12:06:41 AM · #1 |
Wahooooo!...Now I can go and take that one second photo of my big toe....ugh...I have always wanted to do that...muuwwwaahhhh!!
Anyways...here is the link to the previous two-second challenge. And no...not all images (including the ribboners) were two second shots.
Two-second Exposure
|
|
|
03/16/2009 12:11:01 AM · #2 |
Creativity within the established bounds upon penalty of death - a real challenge! |
|
|
03/16/2009 12:11:56 AM · #3 |
Man that sucks... the top finished was a 1/2 second shot... |
|
|
03/16/2009 12:14:12 AM · #4 |
whoa, that's pretty cheap--why wouldn't it be dq'd? |
|
|
03/16/2009 12:14:58 AM · #5 |
Originally posted by vawendy: whoa, that's pretty cheap--why wouldn't it be dq'd? |
DNMC is not grounds for DQ... So they just went with a slow lens (presumably) knowing it wouldn't be caught in the voting phase. |
|
|
03/16/2009 12:15:15 AM · #6 |
Maybe sometime we should have a challenge with specified aperture limits, at either the wide or closed end of one's camera's capabilities. |
|
|
03/16/2009 12:15:21 AM · #7 |
Originally posted by vawendy: whoa, that's pretty cheap--why wouldn't it be dq'd? |
Because (until now) "DNMC" was not grounds for DQ.
EDIT: Wow, you guys are fast. :-)
Message edited by author 2009-03-16 00:15:45. |
|
|
03/16/2009 12:15:23 AM · #8 |
Originally posted by vawendy: whoa, that's pretty cheap--why wouldn't it be dq'd? |
Because it was not stipulated to be a DQable offence....but it is now! We can't change the rules of the past...but we can change the rules of the future.
|
|
|
03/16/2009 12:17:22 AM · #9 |
Did I miss something? DNMC is now a DQ offense? |
|
|
03/16/2009 12:18:41 AM · #10 |
Once I took a 1 second exposure and in the exif it read 0.77 seconds. I wonder if that counts! hahah. |
|
|
03/16/2009 12:19:01 AM · #11 |
Originally posted by jbsmithana: Did I miss something? DNMC is now a DQ offense? |
No, there's a special rule for this challenge. The last time a "time" challenge ran, it only had to look like 2 seconds. This one has to BE exactly 1 second. |
|
|
03/16/2009 12:19:30 AM · #12 |
Originally posted by jbsmithana: Did I miss something? DNMC is now a DQ offense? |
It is if it is posted as a "special extra rule" with the little flag icon -- it applies to this challenge only. |
|
|
03/16/2009 12:20:20 AM · #13 |
Originally posted by jbsmithana: Did I miss something? DNMC is now a DQ offense? |
"Extra Rules: This time, your entry will be disqualified if you do not use shutter speed of 1 second. "
NICE! |
|
|
03/16/2009 12:22:42 AM · #14 |
Originally posted by scalvert: Originally posted by jbsmithana: Did I miss something? DNMC is now a DQ offense? |
No, there's a special rule for this challenge. The last time a "time" challenge ran, it only had to look like 2 seconds. This one has to BE exactly 1 second. |
I guess I did not see the diff with the old description of
Description
Take a photograph using a shutter speed of exactly 2 seconds
and the new one of:
Challenge Details: Take a photograph using a shutter speed of exactly 1 seconds. |
|
|
03/16/2009 12:22:57 AM · #15 |
Originally posted by citymars: Originally posted by vawendy: whoa, that's pretty cheap--why wouldn't it be dq'd? |
Because (until now) "DNMC" was not grounds for DQ.
EDIT: Wow, you guys are fast. :-) |
Ah, I'm still pretty new at this--so I give people the benefit of the doubt. I assume that their photos meet the challenge (even if it's through someone's warped point of view :) But having a first place completely ignore the challenge description boggles my mind. Oh well, I'll also return money if they give me too much change. |
|
|
03/16/2009 12:24:13 AM · #16 |
Originally posted by jbsmithana: Originally posted by scalvert: Originally posted by jbsmithana: Did I miss something? DNMC is now a DQ offense? |
No, there's a special rule for this challenge. The last time a "time" challenge ran, it only had to look like 2 seconds. This one has to BE exactly 1 second. |
I guess I did not see the diff with the old description of
Description
Take a photograph using a shutter speed of exactly 2 seconds
and the new one of:
Challenge Details: Take a photograph using a shutter speed of exactly 1 seconds. |
I'm such an idiot. I did not notice:
Extra Rules: This time, your entry will be disqualified if you do not use shutter speed of 1 second |
|
|
03/16/2009 12:25:56 AM · #17 |
Is this 1.00 sec or can it go to 1.1 or 1.2 sec - ??
|
|
|
03/16/2009 12:26:46 AM · #18 |
Originally posted by Balko: Is this 1.00 sec or can it go to 1.1 or 1.2 sec - ?? |
It says 1 second...so I would say it means one second only...not 1.2 or 1.whatever..lol!
|
|
|
03/16/2009 12:27:03 AM · #19 |
Originally posted by jbsmithana: I'm such an idiot. I did not notice:
Extra Rules: This time, your entry will be disqualified if you do not use shutter speed of 1 second |
Originally posted by jbsmithana: Did I miss something? DNMC is now a DQ offense? |
Imagine the chaos if that was implemented for all future challenges! :-D |
|
|
03/16/2009 12:28:06 AM · #20 |
Originally posted by Balko: Is this 1.00 sec or can it go to 1.1 or 1.2 sec - ?? |
That little qualifier of "exactly" should probably answer your question. |
|
|
03/16/2009 12:28:55 AM · #21 |
No really. Mine did say 0.77 seconds at a 1 second setting. Weird but I will see if it happens again.
I see a lot of smooth water pictures in this one. Ecchhhh. |
|
|
03/16/2009 12:29:11 AM · #22 |
Originally posted by Judi: Originally posted by Balko: Is this 1.00 sec or can it go to 1.1 or 1.2 sec - ?? |
It says 1 second...so I would say it means one second only...not 1.2 or 1.whatever..lol! |
Yah... But you know, I have *set* a shutter speed of 1 second and had the EXIF show .997 seconds, or something like that. Threw me for a loop when I saw that... I wonder if there's gonna be a % deviation allowed? Like, anything between 1.025 and .975 is considered "1 second"? I'm not real worried about it, just curious...
R.
|
|
|
03/16/2009 12:31:28 AM · #23 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music: Originally posted by Judi: Originally posted by Balko: Is this 1.00 sec or can it go to 1.1 or 1.2 sec - ?? |
It says 1 second...so I would say it means one second only...not 1.2 or 1.whatever..lol! |
Yah... But you know, I have *set* a shutter speed of 1 second and had the EXIF show .997 seconds, or something like that. Threw me for a loop when I saw that... I wonder if there's gonna be a % deviation allowed? Like, anything between 1.025 and .975 is considered "1 second"? I'm not real worried about it, just curious...
R. |
Im worried about it! hahah. Mine did the same thing. Maybe they will round it off? |
|
|
03/16/2009 12:32:28 AM · #24 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music: Originally posted by Judi: Originally posted by Balko: Is this 1.00 sec or can it go to 1.1 or 1.2 sec - ?? |
It says 1 second...so I would say it means one second only...not 1.2 or 1.whatever..lol! |
Yah... But you know, I have *set* a shutter speed of 1 second and had the EXIF show .997 seconds, or something like that. Threw me for a loop when I saw that... I wonder if there's gonna be a % deviation allowed? Like, anything between 1.025 and .975 is considered "1 second"? I'm not real worried about it, just curious...
R. |
Hmm. I think if that's a real technical issue, then we're looking at a real disaster of biblical proportions. Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together. MASS HYSTERIA! |
|
|
03/16/2009 12:32:39 AM · #25 |
Originally posted by limerick: Originally posted by Bear_Music: Originally posted by Judi: Originally posted by Balko: Is this 1.00 sec or can it go to 1.1 or 1.2 sec - ?? |
It says 1 second...so I would say it means one second only...not 1.2 or 1.whatever..lol! |
Yah... But you know, I have *set* a shutter speed of 1 second and had the EXIF show .997 seconds, or something like that. Threw me for a loop when I saw that... I wonder if there's gonna be a % deviation allowed? Like, anything between 1.025 and .975 is considered "1 second"? I'm not real worried about it, just curious...
R. |
Im worried about it! hahah. Mine did the same thing. Maybe they will round it off? |
Well considering you can't (as far as I am aware) set your camera for .997 seconds...I think you should be okay.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/12/2025 06:39:26 AM EDT.