| Author | Thread |
|
|
02/18/2009 12:12:44 PM · #1 |
Canon D10
Looks interesting!! |
|
|
|
02/18/2009 12:16:23 PM · #2 |
| That's pretty cool. I'll have to get my hands on one of those. |
|
|
|
02/18/2009 02:27:07 PM · #3 |
| yea, if you consider how expensive the underwater housing is for the G9, this is a steal. And the mounting points, carabiner cable, etc, look interesting, too. |
|
|
|
02/18/2009 02:28:52 PM · #4 |
Originally posted by chromeydome: yea, if you consider how expensive the underwater housing is for the G9, this is a steal. And the mounting points, carabiner cable, etc, look interesting, too. |
If you consider how inexpensive the underwater housing is for the G9/G10, that is a steal. (The G9/G10 waterproof housing is about a 10th of the cost of a housing for my other camera) That and the G10 takes quite usable RAW files and can work with accessory flashes underwater quite easily.
|
|
|
|
02/18/2009 02:30:38 PM · #5 |
| Judging from recent new camera announcements, the latest trend seems to be for underwater/waterproof/ruggedized point-and-shoots. Interestingly, the mega-pixel race seems to have stabilised at about 10mp. Let's hope it stays that way until they improve on noise and dynamic range. |
|
|
|
02/18/2009 02:34:57 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by Gordon: Originally posted by chromeydome: yea, if you consider how expensive the underwater housing is for the G9, this is a steal. And the mounting points, carabiner cable, etc, look interesting, too. |
If you consider how inexpensive the underwater housing is for the G9/G10, that is a steal. (The G9/G10 waterproof housing is about a 10th of the cost of a housing for my other camera) That and the G10 takes quite usable RAW files and can work with accessory flashes underwater quite easily. |
right--if you already own a g9 or 10, then the underwater housing add on is less than this camera.
|
|
|
|
02/18/2009 02:38:02 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by JH: Judging from recent new camera announcements, the latest trend seems to be for underwater/waterproof/ruggedized point-and-shoots. Interestingly, the mega-pixel race seems to have stabilised at about 10mp. Let's hope it stays that way until they improve on noise and dynamic range. |
Yup--this looks good for "weather": I wouldn't want to use an underwater housing to go shooting in the rain or snow. When they say it works to 14 deg F, I wonder how much they had to do to achieve that? Or is it a matter of "document it and call it a feature" ? |
|
|
|
02/18/2009 02:59:14 PM · #8 |
thats a pretty cool camera
|
|
|
|
02/18/2009 03:00:09 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by chromeydome: Originally posted by JH: Judging from recent new camera announcements, the latest trend seems to be for underwater/waterproof/ruggedized point-and-shoots. Interestingly, the mega-pixel race seems to have stabilised at about 10mp. Let's hope it stays that way until they improve on noise and dynamic range. |
Yup--this looks good for "weather": I wouldn't want to use an underwater housing to go shooting in the rain or snow. When they say it works to 14 deg F, I wonder how much they had to do to achieve that? Or is it a matter of "document it and call it a feature" ? |
14 deg F isn't really very exciting. I've used quite a few cameras well below -20F without any problems. Not sure it is much of a feature, similar to works at 100F isn't really a feature around here.
The camo clip-on is a real feature though. |
|
|
|
02/18/2009 05:24:05 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by chromeydome: ...When they say it works to 14 deg F, I wonder how much they had to do to achieve that? Or is it a matter of "document it and call it a feature" ? |
What we really need to know is whether it will work at 14°F *underwater*! |
|
|
|
02/18/2009 05:55:44 PM · #11 |
Originally posted by kirbic: Originally posted by chromeydome: ...When they say it works to 14 deg F, I wonder how much they had to do to achieve that? Or is it a matter of "document it and call it a feature" ? |
What we really need to know is whether it will work at 14°F *underwater*! |
Do I sense a new challenge suggestion coming on....? Winner gets a Darwin Award Ribbon (in the Posthumous thread)? |
|
|
|
02/18/2009 05:58:04 PM · #12 |
Man, Canon doesn't get to use pre-number D's! That's our deal!
|
|
|
|
02/18/2009 05:59:13 PM · #13 |
Originally posted by zackdezon: Man, Canon doesn't get to use pre-number D's! That's our deal! |
Nikon was kind of late to the party with that. |
|
|
|
02/18/2009 08:03:10 PM · #14 |
Woah, touché. Had no idea.
|
|
|
|
02/18/2009 09:00:30 PM · #15 |
Originally posted by zackdezon: Woah, touché. Had no idea. |
Yea, but it seems that the Canon D__ numbers are going down! D30 to D10... Nikon is headed in the correct Direction :-) |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 12/26/2025 08:30:47 AM EST.