| Author | Thread |
|
|
11/14/2008 01:18:53 PM · #1 |
What do you think?
|
|
|
|
11/14/2008 01:26:00 PM · #2 |
Looks good! Nice shot!
Amazing how tough kids can be, huh?
[thumb]731930[/thumb]
|
|
|
|
11/14/2008 02:06:14 PM · #3 |
Originally posted by Man_Called_Horse:
What do you think?
|
Honestly....... I think you are a little late on the capture, the peak hit is what I would have liked to see. I always try to see it coming and start a burst before and shoot all the way through the play. Its a nice capture, but one I would have wanted to see 3 frames earlier in a burst.
Matt
|
|
|
|
11/14/2008 07:32:58 PM · #4 |
|
|
|
11/14/2008 07:42:53 PM · #5 |
The first, almost only thing I notice in this image is Number 5 looking right at me.
Neither good nor bad (the looking at me part)--it is what it is. ;-)
Message edited by author 2008-11-14 22:37:53. |
|
|
|
11/14/2008 09:08:26 PM · #6 |
Matto, thanks for the more clear, indepth, critique.
|
|
|
|
11/14/2008 09:50:51 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by Man_Called_Horse:
Matto, thanks for the more clear, indepth, critique. |
You are welcome, sometimes I forget to come back and do that when I put up quick comments while working.
Here is an example that shows what I am talking about. Although while using flash your bursts have to be a bit shorter for recycle times and also for not overheating the flash.
 This is a good photo in its own right(published front page of newspaper)
 This is the next photo in the burst and IMHO a better photo because this is peak action(didnt run
as the player getting clobbered is the local kid and the other team isnt) But had I shot or shown them farther in the sequence I'm essentially past peak and just showing two people falling to the ground after a hit, IMHO the next photos in this sequence is where your photo would fall. And those would be ones that I wouldnt show to the editor. Hopefully this better illustrates what I probably didnt come across very well in text.
Matt
Message edited by author 2008-11-14 21:52:49.
|
|
|
|
11/14/2008 09:57:13 PM · #8 |
Originally posted by MattO:
This is a good photo in its own right(published front page of newspaper)
This is the next photo in the burst and IMHO a better photo because this is peak action(didnt run
as the player getting clobbered is the local kid and the other team isnt) But had I shot or shown them farther in the sequence I'm essentially past peak and just showing two people falling to the ground after a hit, IMHO the next photos in this sequence is where your photo would fall. And those would be ones that I wouldnt show to the editor. Hopefully this better illustrates what I probably didnt come across very well in text.
Matt |
I concure, I think the first image is boring compared to the second image.
|
|
|
|
11/15/2008 07:20:43 AM · #9 |
One last time. Anyone else please.
|
|
|
|
11/15/2008 11:04:21 AM · #10 |
| Left a comment for you, hope you appreciate it. I have 30+ years experience as couch potato football watcher. |
|
|
|
11/15/2008 11:21:21 AM · #11 |
| I actually find the shot interesting for several reasons. The framing is cool, as it builds a perfect 'triangle-of-action'. While I would normally agree with the timing comments, I don't think you missed the mark here... as there is still a lot of action going on, and the viewer is still expecting the big impact at the end of the tackle. I also like that the ref & #5 player seem to be paying more attention to you than to the action on the field. |
|
|
|
11/15/2008 11:26:19 AM · #12 |
Originally posted by roba:
I actually find the shot interesting for several reasons. The framing is cool, as it builds a perfect 'triangle-of-action'. |
You are the first to mention the triangle.
It was the first thing I noticed.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/06/2025 11:21:07 AM EDT.
