Author | Thread |
|
10/11/2008 03:48:17 PM · #26 |
I was just getting ready to copy this photo, and you tell me that! Now I have to shoot water?! |
|
|
10/11/2008 03:53:42 PM · #27 |
Originally posted by Jason_Cross:
I was just getting ready to copy this photo, and you tell me that! Now I have to shoot water?! |
Hey, that looks familiar! |
|
|
10/11/2008 03:55:43 PM · #28 |
It has the emotion that I am going to shoot for in the next shot. Just picture that look but with a super hot chick.
Message edited by author 2008-10-11 15:56:01. |
|
|
10/11/2008 03:57:21 PM · #29 |
I think Portraiture and Model shooting is not only difficult to do well, but difficult to reach strangers with. The "average" portrait is of interest to and valued by the subject, their family & friends--because they already have the connection to the subject. The portraits that do well with a wider audience have something compelling about them: something that reaches right past the "I don't know this person" filter of the viewer and goes right into "I want to know this person" or "I know something about this person"--some sort of connection. Aesthetic, beauty, emotion, desire, and so on. Eyes in Focus is a portraiture "rule" precisely because, I think, the connection can be almost impossible to make otherwise.
Other shots with people as subjects (environmental portraiture, model, fashion) have, I think, less limitations and more opportunities to connect with the general viewer--but they still need some compelling element(s) to accomplish that.
Now add to the 'challenge', if you will, that here you are exhibiting to viewers who are also photographers themselves--often with strongly established personal styles and tastes. This site tends to have a "collective style" for winning shots which is to be expected, and is neither a good or a bad thing. It is what it is.
So, the Band shots you presented at the beginning of this thread are, in my view, excellent shots. They would, I think, score very well in a Band Shot challenge--edgy and very well done. You clearly know what you are doing, sir.
I find many of your images compelling and well done--some examples:
your images of Jen are always compelling--you have a connection here that really works.
stunning b/w image
So, I have to say that I like your style and vision. I would hate to see you alter it in pursuit of a ribbon. Natural organic growth and change in style is a good thing. If you really do wish to obtain a ribbon, I would suggest compartmentalizing that into a Project or Assignment mentality approach: study the winners, find what works here, and imitate it in some fashion that works for you. Imitation helps you learn craft, technique, disciplines that you can later apply to your own unique vision and style. More tools in your toolbox!
As for entering in Free Studies: I also enter the Free Studies (with low expectations) primarily because the subject is open, and I have a full month to work from. The shorter, specific challenges often just don't work with my schedule--I would be growing faster if I could find the time to chase every challenge, but the Free Studies are the most open for me. So, yes, scoring higher is harder in Free Studies (often 400 entries instead of 100 or so).
And, before you take anything I say seriously, probly oughta check my images and see where I fit on the pontificating putz scale! My style seems to be "Overly Wordy" here, so I'll stop now. |
|
|
10/11/2008 03:57:29 PM · #30 |
Originally posted by Jason_Cross: It has the emotion that I am going to shoot for in the next shot. Just picture that look but with a super hot chick. |
I look forward to seeing it. Automatic 10 from me. |
|
|
10/11/2008 04:01:00 PM · #31 |
Super Hot Chicks are always welcome..... |
|
|
10/11/2008 04:08:01 PM · #32 |
I am being rained out of my shoots with 2 models today. I had some kick butt ideas, but looks like I will just be sitting around at home getting my homework done instead. |
|
|
10/11/2008 04:14:41 PM · #33 |
Hey man
Don't change a thing. I would trade my ribbons for more interesting shots like yours. I often find my shots boring but somehow I have had some success.
Originally posted by Jason_Cross: I am being rained out of my shoots with 2 models today. I had some kick butt ideas, but looks like I will just be sitting around at home getting my homework done instead. |
Don't let the rain or light ruin your shoot. Use it to your advantage. Look at Larus recent Free Study entry. He placed very well in a shot that was in the rain.
Keep doing what you are doing and the virtual ribbons will come in the form of adoration from other DPCers like me.
Message edited by author 2008-10-11 16:15:09. |
|
|
10/11/2008 04:37:03 PM · #34 |
Ya, but if my camera gets wet, I will only be able to take photos using my cell phone, and then the fun dies.
Oh ya, and did I mention that it is 40 degrees and raining. COLD.
Message edited by author 2008-10-11 16:37:37. |
|
|
10/11/2008 04:45:06 PM · #35 |
Originally posted by Jason_Cross: Ya, but if my camera gets wet, I will only be able to take photos using my cell phone, and then the fun dies.
Oh ya, and did I mention that it is 40 degrees and raining. COLD. |
That´s no bloody excuse, you can always get a bag to cover your camera (I did) and as for 40 degrees and raining, try 38 degrees and going out in the remains of hurricane Ike, wind speeds so high that people were warned to stay inside... Where there is a will there is a way, just roll with what is given to you and you´ll be fine, just be glad to get the opportunity to do something different or shoot in "unusual" circumstances. |
|
|
10/11/2008 04:48:28 PM · #36 |
I shot in the snow...once.
Did I mention that I am a wuss? |
|
|
10/11/2008 06:28:30 PM · #37 |
If you want to break out of the 6.0-6.3 range you have to keep people from voting 1-4 on your shots. This means not giving them reasons to vote you down. In a free study, that means technicals. The shots you presented are all good enough subject to score 6.5+, but you have excuses in each shot for a handful of 4s or even below if people are grumpy.
I find the least wrong with this, but it's also your highest that you present. I think the light patch on the right distracts from the model. I bet with a burn around the edges and burning the light patch down you would have come close to 6.5.
Great shot, but the easy excuse is the frontman's skin looks jaundiced. Color tones are important.
You need to be very confident you know what you are doing any time you blow a highlight on this site. I'm quite sure you got some 4s simply because his T-shirt was blown.
Well, this is a subtle shot, which is tough to score well. It doesn't follow the rule of thirds well with the negative space sharing almost exactly half the canvas with the drum.
Anyway, the point is you do not need to necessarily change your subject matter, but you need to work on dotting the i's and crossing the t's with your technicals. |
|
|
10/11/2008 06:32:18 PM · #38 |
Great advice, thanks I really appreciate it. That was some good constructive stuff that I can use in getting better. |
|
|
10/11/2008 06:37:07 PM · #39 |
I just take the advice given me by a supervisor I had yonks ago...'don't have any expectations, that way you can never be disappointed.' Harsh, but true, so when I broke 6 last year on what was basically a random shot with a P&S, I was over the moon! |
|
|
10/11/2008 06:50:53 PM · #40 |
Now way! I want to succeed. By lower my expectations I am just throwing in the towel. I have a desire to be good at what I do. Shoot for the moon, and land on Mars. That is what I am thinking. |
|
|
10/11/2008 06:54:12 PM · #41 |
Then go for it! :-)
And if you don't mind another piece of random advice...if over 50% of your comments say the same thing about a shot, they're probably onto something...
Good luck! |
|
|
10/11/2008 06:56:58 PM · #42 |
Ya, but Jason gave some good advice on things I need to change based on the particulars of what has been my style. Seems like I am 75% there, and I just need to improve on the other 25% in order to score better.
I hope you don't think I was not taking your advice Susan, I was not trying to be snide. I just want to score high, and I don't want to settle for "good" which is what most of the comments say about my stuff. |
|
|
10/11/2008 07:20:59 PM · #43 |
Originally posted by Jason_Cross: I just want to score high, and I don't want to settle for "good" which is what most of the comments say about my stuff. |
Keep in mind that after we have been here for a while, our senses get dulled by seeing fantastic photos all the time. "Good" at this site is "WOW, OUT-STANDING" to others. I like the goal of hitting the 7's while retaining your own style and doing the shots you like.
Message edited by author 2008-10-11 19:21:35. |
|
|
10/11/2008 07:39:39 PM · #44 |
Shadow Curriculum
Each year we see the novices arrive,
eager for Accolade and full of scorn
for our Establishment, already torn
between their need for patrons and their pride.
We teach of shadows - darkened by the light,
contrasting with the cold or warmer tones
around them – touched and touching, but alone.
By that which they are not, they are defined.
Over the student body, then, we throw
the shadows of our former selves like nets
to capture animals and so; to set
free from these hallowed halls they need to know
how characters of three dimensions step
from fallen shadows that have only two.
Peter Stewart Richards |
|
|
10/11/2008 08:12:00 PM · #45 |
Ooooh Peter, I like that! |
|
|
10/11/2008 08:45:59 PM · #46 |
I don't get it. So am I supposed to capture an animal in a net, put it in a darkened hallway, light it from the side (for extra shadows) and then make it smile? |
|
|
10/11/2008 08:48:05 PM · #47 |
Another big question is "HOW DO I BREAK INTO THE LOW 6's?" Low 5's would even be nice!
Message edited by author 2008-10-11 20:48:21.
|
|
|
10/11/2008 08:48:37 PM · #48 |
Originally posted by Truegsht: Another big question is "HOW DO I BREAK INTO THE LOW 6's?" Low 5's would even be nice! |
That's the one I'm more interested in. lol. |
|
|
10/11/2008 08:56:41 PM · #49 |
What Brad said!
It is so easy to fall into a weekly grind of taking "challenge pictures". What can happen is that your photos end up looking contrived and boring (and usually have a score to reflect that), and not at all expressive of the phographers passion. I'm having a harder and harder time coming up with photos that really move me for the challenges because I am so not interested in forcing it any more like I used to just for a score. I am usually out there trying each week, but it's getting more rare that I come up with something I'm proud of.
Anyway, Jason, don't work too hard on posing your models and contriving photos that you think will score high. My advice would be to keep working, learning and trying to improve the style and subject you love, and are GOOD at! And incorporate new and improved things only as they really move YOU.
I think your work is awesome. |
|
|
10/11/2008 09:02:26 PM · #50 |
Originally posted by SandyP: My advice would be to keep working, learning and trying to improve the style and subject you love, and are GOOD at! And incorporate new and improved things only as they really move YOU. |
What do you do if you discover you're good at something that really seems to resonate with the voters, they support their votes with intelligent commentary, yet what you're doing doesn't really appeal to you?
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/17/2025 07:10:10 PM EDT.