DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Current Challenge >> product challenge question
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 25 of 59, (reverse)
AuthorThread
09/01/2008 07:31:53 PM · #1
Challenge Details: Take a photograph of a product that might appear in a catalog.

There is a difference between a "catalog shot" and a "ad shot" So I am assuming that the challenge is calling for a product catalog shot and a "ad shot" would be a DNMC


09/01/2008 07:34:32 PM · #2
If you can take a picture that looks like an ad it should be able to be utilized as a catalog shot!
09/01/2008 07:34:56 PM · #3
I think the catalog was more to provide some context than to become a strict guideline. I think any product shot would be fine.
09/01/2008 07:37:00 PM · #4
I want to make sure as there is a huge difference in styling
09/01/2008 07:43:52 PM · #5
I agree... they're totally different.
A shot for a catalog is not a shot for an ad.
09/01/2008 07:52:21 PM · #6
Originally posted by LydiaToo:

I agree... they're totally different.
A shot for a catalog is not a shot for an ad.

Perhaps one of you would care to elaborate in just what way(s) you think they are "totally different" -- and exactly why (especially for this challenge) it's important to make the distinction.

Other than catalog shots often having the "product" cut out from the background, and ad shots often placing the product in some context, I can't think of many reasons they'd be different. As someone who sometimes submits shots to stock agencies, I'd try to put images which could be used for either.
09/01/2008 08:06:52 PM · #7
Definition that I learned in school waaay back

A Product "catalog" shot should be a accurate representation of the product that a customer is going to purchase It should be color matched to the product and really not "embellished" (much). The styling of the shot is going to be much more simple (does not mean boring and flat ... just more simple)

An advertising shot is a inducement. It should capture the viewers interest in the product. It does not have to be accurate on shape size or color.


Message edited by author 2008-09-01 20:10:52.
09/01/2008 08:14:21 PM · #8
Originally posted by nomad469:

Definition that I learned in school waaay back

A Product "catalog" shot should be a accurate representation of the product that a customer is going to purchase It should be color matched to the product and really not "embellished" (much). The styling of the shot is going to be much more simple (does not mean boring and flat ... just more simple)

An advertising shot is a inducement. It should capture the viewers interest in the product. It does not have to be accurate on shape size or color.


Well, if I saw an ad for strawberry jam that was purple I doubt the ad would be doing it's job. I think there is more the difference in the crop with the ad having more white space for text, where the catalog pic usually has a seperate text box outside the photo.
09/01/2008 08:14:32 PM · #9
Originally posted by nomad469:

Definition that I learned in school waaay back

A Product "catalog" shot should be a accurate representation of the product that a customer is going to purchase It should be color matched to the product and really not "embellished" (much). The styling of the shot is going to be much more simple (does not mean boring and flat ... just more simple)

An advertising shot is a inducement. It should capture the viewers interest in the product. It does not have to be accurate on shape size or color.


I agree with nomad469. But, I suspect that there will be a lot of advertisement shots in the Catalog Challenge.
09/01/2008 08:15:58 PM · #10
Originally posted by nomad469:

Definition that I learned in school waaay back

A Product "catalog" shot should be a accurate representation of the product that a customer is going to purchase It should be color matched to the product and really not "embellished" (much). The styling of the shot is going to be much more simple (does not mean boring and flat ... just more simple)

An advertising shot is a inducement. It should capture the viewers interest in the product. It does not have to be accurate on shape size or color.


Good analysis.
Thinking in terms of DPC fondness for glitz and glamour, an advertising shot will be probably score better than a "catalog product" shot, in spite of what definition we establish here.
09/01/2008 08:18:35 PM · #11
just a quick question then:

WOuld a shot of a 'say' horse eating hay be the correct definition,

or would the bale of hay be the shot that would be correct???

09/01/2008 08:31:57 PM · #12
Originally posted by JulietNN:



WOuld a shot of a 'say' horse eating hay be the correct definition,

or would the bale of hay be the shot that would be correct???


Are you wanting to buy hay or a horse?
09/01/2008 08:41:21 PM · #13
lol, geesh thanks!!! lololol

okay how about this one:

A can of coke sitting in a studio

or

A can of coke being drunk by some hot chick.

Product or advertisment or is it both
09/01/2008 08:42:57 PM · #14
Originally posted by JulietNN:

lol, geesh thanks!!! lololol

okay how about this one:

A can of coke sitting in a studio

or

A can of coke being drunk by some hot chick.

Product or advertisment or is it both


Both, but the challenge description stating that it should be in a catalog will likely lead to many DNMC votes...a pity.
09/01/2008 09:01:37 PM · #15
umm hmm,

well it could be a catalog for hot chicks that like to drink coke, cos it is diet coke???? =oO
09/01/2008 09:05:51 PM · #16
Another week long discussion attempting to define the challenge in the narrowest possible terms, eh? Such fun.
09/01/2008 09:06:14 PM · #17
i will beat you all in this challenge!! wah ha!!!
09/01/2008 09:09:56 PM · #18
Originally posted by violinist123:

Another week long discussion attempting to define the challenge in the narrowest possible terms, eh? Such fun.


A complete pity IMO - the challenge title seems to have been enough - boxing it in so that it fits into a catalog seems a bit narrow - and I worry that DNMC voters will make those who are creative pay
09/01/2008 09:12:37 PM · #19
Originally posted by bassbone:

Originally posted by JulietNN:

lol, geesh thanks!!! lololol

okay how about this one:

A can of coke sitting in a studio

or

A can of coke being drunk by some hot chick.

Product or advertisment or is it both


Both, but the challenge description stating that it should be in a catalog will likely lead to many DNMC votes...a pity.


Are you kidding? My standard reaction to most catalogue shots is "Does it come with the model?" PLENTY of catalogues use models, whether it's for clothes or not.

For this challenge, I'd recommend you shoot something that makes someone want to buy something. And I'd be willing to bet 99% of the members don't know (and wouldn't care) about technical differences between ads and catalog shots.
09/01/2008 09:16:05 PM · #20
Originally posted by levyj413:

Originally posted by bassbone:

Originally posted by JulietNN:

lol, geesh thanks!!! lololol

okay how about this one:

A can of coke sitting in a studio

or

A can of coke being drunk by some hot chick.

Product or advertisment or is it both


Both, but the challenge description stating that it should be in a catalog will likely lead to many DNMC votes...a pity.


Are you kidding? My standard reaction to most catalogue shots is "Does it come with the model?" PLENTY of catalogues use models, whether it's for clothes or not.

For this challenge, I'd recommend you shoot something that makes someone want to buy something. And I'd be willing to bet 99% of the members don't know (and wouldn't care) about technical differences between ads and catalog shots.


its the people who get all technical are the ones who destroy your score:/
09/01/2008 09:21:44 PM · #21
Originally posted by kawesttex:

If you can take a picture that looks like an ad it should be able to be utilized as a catalog shot!


I think it's the other way around. If it's a catalog shot it could be used as an ad.
I've done some thinking. Take my Ad shot, it's DNMC for catalog and a lot of other Ad shots are too. An ad can also sell a service but for catalog I expect a physical product. For a catalog the actual product has to be shown and not tampered with too much. Most likely shown in full, a grey area though. Sure there can be a setup or a model, but the product has to take most of the focus not the model or props. An ad in theory is supposed to make you want the product or trigger some responce and has more room for a conceptual representation.

Let's take Listerine because I happen to have it sitting on my desk ;)
For an ad, for the shot, imagine a lady showing off her beautiful smile, big teeth smile being the main focus, top part of the face cropped, and in her hand is a colored green liquid. On the bottom left corner they show tiny resized bottle of the actual product. Cheesy huh LOL. An ad but not a catalog shot. An ad can also display a rainbow of flavors in one image, say ice cream, but when looking at the catalog they show each item in it's own image area.



Message edited by author 2008-09-01 21:32:28.
09/01/2008 09:32:21 PM · #22
Originally posted by violinist123:

Another week long discussion attempting to define the challenge in the narrowest possible terms, eh? Such fun.


Oh goodness, LIGHTEN UP, I was joking around.

But seriously, so what if people want to discuss something to death, don't click on the link, it is that simple. Don't read the thread. People can do what they want and discuss what they want, when they want to.

09/01/2008 09:44:14 PM · #23
Originally posted by JulietNN:

Originally posted by violinist123:

Another week long discussion attempting to define the challenge in the narrowest possible terms, eh? Such fun.


Oh goodness, LIGHTEN UP, I was joking around.

But seriously, so what if people want to discuss something to death, don't click on the link, it is that simple. Don't read the thread. People can do what they want and discuss what they want, when they want to.


You aren't even the OP. Nontheless, extra points for irony.
09/01/2008 09:55:43 PM · #24
Originally posted by JulietNN:

Originally posted by violinist123:

Another week long discussion attempting to define the challenge in the narrowest possible terms, eh? Such fun.


Oh goodness, LIGHTEN UP, I was joking around.

But seriously, so what if people want to discuss something to death, don't click on the link, it is that simple. Don't read the thread. People can do what they want and discuss what they want, when they want to.

Better to debate it now, before entries are in and voting has started; at least in theory. In the end, it won't matter much anyway as there is undoubtedly going to be spillover of debate in the scores thread (attempts to sell a point and sway voters). Always has, always will be...
09/01/2008 09:57:23 PM · #25
I was just wondering... due the the history of some of our fellow DPCers nit-picking everything to death ... I wanted to be sure that I did the right thing ;)

Pages:  
Current Server Time: 08/15/2025 05:16:22 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/15/2025 05:16:22 AM EDT.