| Author | Thread |
|
|
10/10/2003 06:10:59 PM · #51 |
It seems your comment is pretty much like what everyone else got. Mindless, no thought, and ver y short sighted opinion. She has nothing to say, and obviously is a TOTALLY literal type of person. Not too much upstairs, either, IMO. Don't sweat any of it. This just feeds the trolls is all.
|
|
|
|
10/11/2003 01:59:37 AM · #52 |
Originally posted by OneSweetSin:
Originally posted by toocool:
After a little detective work I've discovered that the individual in question commented on my Urban pic. She must have learned something because she didn't use any capital letters...
Total comment was "not really urban"... I was gonna PM her and ask how it could NOT be urban but after looking at her profile and comments and avg. score I decided it wasn't worth the effort of pushing down all those keys... |
Oh please do pm her. Let me tell you how she justifies it. She will pm you back with some chose words and then the defination of the word urban as defined by Webster. Believe me she spent more time in copy and pasting from Webster for the reply I got than she did in all 38 comments she had left as of this morning. LOL oh heck I dare you to pm her and ask her how it could not be urban. |
I had to wait till after work as I'm not supposed to use the DSL there (Yeah right, I can check my scores at broadband speeds :-P) but did as you suggested. If it's really bad I'll just forward it to the DPC Gods for review and potential lightning bolts!!!
Message edited by author 2003-10-11 02:02:15.
|
|
|
|
10/11/2003 11:10:52 PM · #53 |
| Since we're on the subject....I don't know if its phantomemma that you're talking about...but I find some, if not MOST, of her comments offensive. And there's PLENTY of foul language in her comments. Site council? |
|
|
|
10/12/2003 02:43:23 PM · #54 |
There was 1 case of foul language (used in a positive comment), but none of the other comments use foul language. They didn't seem all that offensive either.
Message edited by author 2003-10-12 14:48:22.
|
|
|
|
10/12/2003 03:38:34 PM · #55 |
I did notice that many of her comments were rude even if partially helpful, and occasionally inane, but I only saw one instance of "profanity."
In the land of the free, people have to be left free to make fools of themselves, too. Her comments are signed. If they are idiotic, then they'll be ignored. If they raise a valid point, then they're useful, even if poorly phrased. |
|
|
|
10/12/2003 05:39:40 PM · #56 |
Actually Clay was a talented ladd...A bit gross maybe.
but I kind of miss him and his since of humor.
quote=Clay " my predictions did not come true.
its just a picture of a shoe.
rotated to the left, just for you.
it kind of pixelated when i adjusted the hue.
im banned from the forums, still emotionally blue."
oh heck, I can't get the thumb to work... if someone wants to fix it?
[//www.//images.dpchallenge.com/images_challenge13/thumb/1253/jpg[/img]]Rubber Baby Duckie Chuckie
Originally posted by achiral:
too bad most of you weren't here for Clay...now that was a troll...and a particularly funny one at that |
Message edited by author 2003-10-12 18:44:54. |
|
|
|
10/12/2003 05:45:06 PM · #57 |
I just read through Clay's profile, photos and comments.....Some charachter alright. It says on his profile he is suspended till 2004! Maybe he'll be back to humor us soon!
|
|
|
|
10/13/2003 12:05:06 AM · #58 |
Originally posted by Konador:
There was 1 case of foul language (used in a positive comment), but none of the other comments use foul language. They didn't seem all that offensive either. |
There were TWO instances where she used the "F" word....but who's counting?? :) |
|
|
|
10/13/2003 02:51:41 AM · #59 |
|
|
|
10/13/2003 04:23:14 AM · #60 |
who cares about the f word, it's just a WORD!!!!!!!!!!!
And they were used in a positve way. |
|
|
|
10/14/2003 11:19:04 AM · #61 |
If we are going to berate people for their cyber-grammar, could we please give some consideration for the enochiophobic exclamation mark. It doesn't like hanging out in groups and much prefers being alone.
Less is more, particularly in this case !
|
|
|
|
10/14/2003 03:21:46 PM · #62 |
Well after several days, I got a reply from the 'troll' and was quite surprised by it. It was well put together and made sense to me unlike the original comment placed on my photo!
The reply was this "It wasn't as dynamic as other submissions with less emphasis on the "urban"... urban landscape doesn't mean urban+landscape... it means a landscape formed by urban things.. buildings etc"
If they would have said something like that originaly I wouldn't have commented here at all!!!
|
|
|
|
10/14/2003 11:38:51 PM · #63 |
Originally posted by toocool:
Well after several days, I got a reply from the 'troll' and was quite surprised by it. It was well put together and made sense to me unlike the original comment placed on my photo!
The reply was this "It wasn't as dynamic as other submissions with less emphasis on the "urban"... urban landscape doesn't mean urban+landscape... it means a landscape formed by urban things.. buildings etc"
If they would have said something like that originaly I wouldn't have commented here at all!!! |
lucky you, you got more than i did but she is describing Cityscapes not urban landscapes |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 10/14/2025 12:11:22 PM EDT.
