| Author | Thread |
|
|
02/06/2008 07:26:27 PM · #1 |
I have the Canon Rebel XTI and am looking into purchasing an affordable external flash. I have had the Speedlite flashes recommended to me, but the most recent model is out of my price range...even the last one might be a little too high for me.
Any other recommendations? |
|
|
|
02/06/2008 07:28:52 PM · #2 |
What is your price range?
The 430EX is not that expensive. |
|
|
|
02/06/2008 07:35:38 PM · #3 |
As far as eTTL flashes go, the Sigma 500 DG ST is hard to beat price/performance wise, although it lacks fine manual controls.
If you can live without TTL, the Sunpak 383 Auto flash is one hell of a flash and quite inexpensive. Just because it doesn't have TTL doesn't mean you have to go full manual. It has thyristor auto mode that uses a sensor to control output. It's quite accurate. It's about $80 at B&H. Also works well with cheap wireless triggers if you want to get the flash off camera.
Sunpak 383 flashes
|
|
|
|
02/06/2008 07:36:00 PM · #4 |
I don't know exactly what my cutoff dollar is going to be...but right now, less expensive is better as I am also trying to get a wireless remote...
I got my tax return back and am trying to invest some of it into more equipment that I have needed and been lacking. Unfortunately, with a multitude of other bills to pay off, the camera equipment is getting the short end of the stick.
I have vacation in a month and am hoping to be able to pick up something, even if it is not top of the line. Otherwise, I would try to hold on to my money and save for the better equipment.
I guess if I could stay in/under/around $200 for a flash I would be happy right now. |
|
|
|
02/06/2008 07:36:57 PM · #5 |
Originally posted by fotomann_forever: As far as eTTL flashes go, the Sigma 500 DG ST is hard to beat price/performance wise, although it lacks fine manual controls.
If you can live without TTL, the Sunpak 383 Auto flash is one hell of a flash and quite inexpensive. Just because it doesn't have TTL doesn't mean you have to go full manual. It has thyristor auto mode that uses a sensor to control output. It's quite accurate. It's about $80 at B&H. Also works well with cheap wireless triggers if you want to get the flash off camera.
Sunpak 383 flashes |
Please excuse my lack of knowledge here - but could you explain TTL to me? I have heard the term before but am not quite sure I understand it fully. |
|
|
|
02/06/2008 07:39:58 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by ArpeggioAngel:
Please excuse my lack of knowledge here - but could you explain TTL to me? I have heard the term before but am not quite sure I understand it fully. |
From wikipedia:
Through-the-lens (TTL) metering is a photographic technique in which measurements (usually of light levels) are made through the lens of a camera. The term most often refers to controlling the amount of light emitted from the flash by measuring the light falling back into the flash sensor ΓΆ€” through the camera's lens.
In TTL, flash metering occurs after the shutter has been opened ΓΆ€” the sensors record the amount of flash-created light returning to the camera through the lens and automatically shut off ("quench") the flash when an appropriate amount of light has been produced.
Basically TTL uses a sensor inside the camera to tell the flash when to cut off.
Thyristor Auto flashes, such as the Sunpak 383 use a sensor on the flash itself to know when to cut off.
|
|
|
|
02/06/2008 07:49:53 PM · #7 |
| Thank you. I appreciate the insight and input! |
|
|
|
02/06/2008 08:05:30 PM · #8 |
| Photonotes.org is a great site to get you a lot of the basics and terminology of flash photography, especially for canon users. Check it out! |
|
|
|
02/06/2008 08:08:55 PM · #9 |
Just like to add that no current DSLR's support TTL.
The last DSLR to have TTL support was the Pentax *Ist DS. All current DSLR's support flash metering via preflash techniques.
bazz. |
|
|
|
02/06/2008 08:14:26 PM · #10 |
True...
Canon uses E-TTL... Nikon iTTL. Still the principle of use is the same. A pre-flash hits a bounces off the subject and back to a sensor that then tells the flash the subject distance and it outputs accordingly.
But they are all measured through the lens.
|
|
|
|
02/06/2008 08:16:17 PM · #11 |
Originally posted by fotomann_forever: As far as eTTL flashes go, the Sigma 500 DG ST is hard to beat price/performance wise, although it lacks fine manual controls.
|
Urm - i have heard the opposite... if you are going for the sigma range, dont bother with the DG ST - use the "Super" versions (slightly more expensive but pretty much half the price of the canon alternative 550 or 580 (depending if you go for the sigma 500 or 530))... i just got the 530 Super and am very impressed with it so far (it works with a 580ex as a master as well btw so you dont need to worry about future purchases) - it registers the 1.6x crop sensor and zooms appropriately, it has compatability with E-ttl II plus it has optic slave funtions so you can trigger it with your onboard flash... (although that is somewhat limiting if you dont want frontal fill flash - but useful nonetheless).
If it is just having a manual flash you can use offboard - consider buying some of the eBay remote triggers which mount on your hotshoe and using a manual flash:
//www.strobist.blogspot.com/
I cant recommend that site enough if you are thinking of off-board flash use :) |
|
|
|
02/06/2008 08:33:10 PM · #12 |
| I am thinking for right now it would probably be mainly used onboard the camera. I don't really have much use for offboard right now - although that may change in the future as I would really like to get a home studio set up. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 12/29/2025 09:34:14 AM EST.