| Author | Thread |
|
|
11/29/2007 09:17:46 PM · #1 |
|
|
|
11/29/2007 09:19:26 PM · #2 |
|
|
|
11/29/2007 09:21:51 PM · #3 |
|
|
|
11/29/2007 09:24:01 PM · #4 |
Originally posted by dacrazyrn:
2 cameras and photoshop |
Yeah, would be simple. Looking at the finger over the photo, the "mask" looks kinda soft.
Message edited by author 2007-11-29 23:38:11.
|
|
|
|
11/29/2007 09:24:36 PM · #5 |
This is actually is pretty sweet, study it for a minute, its much more complex then it seems..
|
|
|
|
11/29/2007 11:30:56 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by buzzrock:
This is actually is pretty sweet, study it for a minute, its much more complex then it seems.. |
thats exactly what i am saying the more you look at it the more you see
|
|
|
|
11/29/2007 11:37:34 PM · #7 |
| That's very well done, even to get the shadows looking right. |
|
|
|
11/29/2007 11:43:33 PM · #8 |
It's very cool, but I think it's done by simply posing everyone and taking the two shots simultaneously. My guess is each guy was holding a blank white card.
Then in Photoshop you paste a lot.
Again, I think the result is very interesting! Just not that much planning. Rather, the time was in editing.
|
|
|
|
11/29/2007 11:53:29 PM · #9 |
| I might be a little slow but if you loook close, they all seem to be the same person. Might just be the lights playing tricks on me:-} |
|
|
|
11/29/2007 11:58:14 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by Quigley:
I might be a little slow but if you loook close, they all seem to be the same person. Might just be the lights playing tricks on me:-} |
It is the same person. |
|
|
|
11/30/2007 12:18:11 AM · #11 |
Then I take it back: a LOT of planning. :)
|
|
|
|
11/30/2007 12:51:28 AM · #12 |
|
|
|
11/30/2007 01:52:25 AM · #13 |
I'm not convinced it's all the same person. There is birthmark under the left eye of the person in the red sweater. Although it could be cloned out I don't see the same markings on the person in the white tee. The hair crops also appear different, and the photographer kneeling appears to have significantly longer hair than any of the others. Those are all things you could do in photoshop but why go to that much trouble?
Also the inner most photograph doesn't contain the right image. Two photographers with the guy in the red sweater holding a previously taken photograph, and the guy in the black jacket holding a blank white card. From then just two photographs to cut and paste.
If it is only one person, I would be very interested to learn how. |
|
|
|
11/30/2007 02:30:09 AM · #14 |
| put the camera on a tripod, use a wireless remote, go into position for each photo. merge them in photoshop. and there you have multipuls of yourself |
|
|
|
11/30/2007 02:32:58 AM · #15 |
The Chan octuplets? The eighth is holding the camera?
|
|
|
|
11/30/2007 02:47:17 AM · #16 |
Originally posted by Jimbo_for_life:
put the camera on a tripod, use a wireless remote, go into position for each photo. merge them in photoshop. and there you have multipuls of yourself |
If you were to do that for this photo wouldn't you need two cameras? Seems like you would want the same identical pose from opposite directions. |
|
|
|
11/30/2007 04:31:08 AM · #17 |
i wouldn't downplay it from either a planning or editing side. it's just something that i wish i had thought of, kinda like this...
 |
|
|
|
11/30/2007 07:14:24 AM · #18 |
| I'm having fun reverse-engineering this, it's much more complicated than just the ordinary multiple selves picture because it includes the picture-in-a-picture technique with the twist of having two points of view. I'll have to give this a try once I've figured it out. |
|
|
|
11/30/2007 09:56:04 AM · #19 |
|
|
|
11/30/2007 10:26:02 AM · #20 |
Originally posted by buzzrock:
This is actually is pretty sweet, study it for a minute, its much more complex then it seems.. |
no kidding, this is real cool!
|
|
|
|
11/30/2007 10:33:42 AM · #21 |
| Seemed plain at the beginning but got complex as I looked more closely.. nice! |
|
|
|
11/30/2007 11:17:32 AM · #22 |
| my brain hurts. that's awesome. :) |
|
|
|
11/30/2007 11:49:24 AM · #23 |
Thats cool, but check this one out
DPC'er Bill Jemison
Its from the same site :( |
|
|
|
11/30/2007 11:56:05 AM · #24 |
it is pretty easy to do those sorts of shots. just a bit of thought and planning.
|
|
|
|
11/30/2007 12:03:57 PM · #25 |
wow thats pretty cool.... you guys are right the more you look at it the more you see also how he did it
But anyway it is cool
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/07/2025 06:40:37 AM EDT.
