| Author | Thread |
|
|
11/14/2007 09:21:18 AM · #26 |
Folks are apparently interpreting my front bokeh as back bokeh (2 comments received saying as much). 4.56 and falling.
Oh well. Not anything I can do about it. |
|
|
|
11/14/2007 09:21:49 AM · #27 |
I guess I didn't get it???
Votes: 30
Views: 51
Avg Vote: 4.8333
Comments: 0
Oh well!!
|
|
|
|
11/14/2007 09:40:10 AM · #28 |
i got this comment that is basicaly saying that my foreground bokeh doesnt have any purpose......
hello.... its a foreground bokeh challenge!!!! how many foreground bokeh photos do people take in life? i have never seen any until this challenge... vast majority of bokeh are in the background, thats why there was a thread started with tens of entries of "what is a foreground bokeh"
so what's better to get a DNMC.... or its a foreground bokeh with no purpose??? i guess the jury is sill out on this one....
|
|
|
|
11/14/2007 09:42:03 AM · #29 |
Headed in the right direction at least.
Votes: 38
Views: 61
Avg Vote: 6.3947
Comments: 1 |
|
|
|
11/14/2007 09:52:07 AM · #30 |
Tim put down your camera.....step away from DPC.....your on fire.....just back off a bit bud....wheres that damn voodoo doll of mine...
:)
Originally posted by timfythetoo:
Headed in the right direction at least.
Votes: 38
Views: 61
Avg Vote: 6.3947
Comments: 1 |
|
|
|
|
11/14/2007 09:53:43 AM · #31 |
Woohoo!
Votes: 36
Views: 51
Avg Vote: 5.1389
Comments: 1
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 11/14/07 09:52 am |
|
|
|
11/14/2007 10:14:09 AM · #32 |
I was amazed this morning to see this
Votes: 32
Views: 48
Avg Vote: 6.2500
I was going to pull it because I have been doing so badly lately. Thank you voters!
|
|
|
|
11/14/2007 10:25:29 AM · #33 |
Originally posted by Nobody:
Folks are apparently interpreting my front bokeh as back bokeh (2 comments received saying as much). 4.56 and falling.
Oh well. Not anything I can do about it. |
yep - same here. Mine is also being interpreted that way. Oh well... at least people are stating how they are analyzing it.
|
|
|
|
11/14/2007 10:34:59 AM · #34 |
I struggled taking dozens of photos until I got actual "Bokeh" in the foreground. Not a blur or an out of focus something ..actual Bokeh. Alas it is not to be...now they want to see the object in the bacground more clearly! FOREGROUND BOKEH...not BACKGROUND SHARPNESS! I give up, I don't know why I bother with these "subjective" challenges. From now on, if it is not clear what is being asked for I am out...should have gone topless!
|
|
|
|
11/14/2007 10:40:48 AM · #35 |
Originally posted by jerseyjim:
I struggled taking dozens of photos until I got actual "Bokeh" in the foreground. Not a blur or an out of focus something ..actual Bokeh. Alas it is not to be...now they want to see the object in the bacground more clearly! FOREGROUND BOKEH...not BACKGROUND SHARPNESS! I give up, I don't know why I bother with these "subjective" challenges. From now on, if it is not clear what is being asked for I am out...should have gone topless! |
Bokeh, whether foreground or background, is not supposed to be the subject, but to enhance a subject. So if you can't see the subject clearly, well, honestly, I understand where your commenters are coming from.
|
|
|
|
11/14/2007 10:46:14 AM · #36 |
Originally posted by jerseyjim:
From now on, if it is not clear what is being asked for I am out... |
You might have to re-consider that, for even on most clear and specific challenges voters (and few commentators) have a way to get on the nerves... |
|
|
|
11/14/2007 10:52:50 AM · #37 |
Originally posted by hotpasta:
Very disappointing...After voting, I rekon only about 5% really understood bokeh. Most were simply distracting out of focus foregrounds that had no rhyme or reason...there were about 4 or 5 standouts that got it |
Oh puleez hush, do you think dpc voters need extra reasons to vote down a photo with any kind of blur in the forground? |
|
|
|
11/14/2007 11:02:59 AM · #38 |
Originally posted by colorcarnival:
Originally posted by Nobody:
Folks are apparently interpreting my front bokeh as back bokeh (2 comments received saying as much). 4.56 and falling.
Oh well. Not anything I can do about it. |
yep - same here. Mine is also being interpreted that way. Oh well... at least people are stating how they are analyzing it. |
I found it technically difficult to get foreground bokeh that looked like it was in the foreground. My favorite shot didn't get entered because I figured if I thought it was difficult to tell where the OOF objects were located voters would have the same issue. So I re-shot with a different subject and different (shorter) lens.
Haven't looked at the other entries yet but I will assume some people have the same issue I had and give them the benefit of the doubt as to where the bokeh is located. But if it's blatantly in the foreground and looks pretty and enhances the subject, I will vote it higher. |
|
|
|
11/14/2007 11:44:19 AM · #39 |
Votes: 48
Views: 86
Avg Vote: 6.3542
Comments: 4
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 11/14/07 11:41 am
I had the same problem getting more foreground. Oh well, wahatever will be will be.
|
|
|
|
11/14/2007 11:53:15 AM · #40 |
Originally posted by skewsme:
Originally posted by hotpasta:
Very disappointing...After voting, I rekon only about 5% really understood bokeh. Most were simply distracting out of focus foregrounds that had no rhyme or reason...there were about 4 or 5 standouts that got it |
Oh puleez hush, do you think dpc voters need extra reasons to vote down a photo with any kind of blur in the forground? |
I agree with Hotpasta. If the submissions didn't get the challege right, why shouldn't they be voted down? I stopped voting because after 20 or so I only saw one that captured it correctly. If we keep only voting because it's pretty, cute, beautiful, etc, etc, blah-blah and it doesn't even remotely meet the challenge, how the heck is anyone going to learn that the need to follow the rules and/or research the subject more before entering is an important aspect of this site. I'm fed up with being called DNMC police. I'm going to vote the way I see it. So there! |
|
|
|
11/14/2007 01:32:32 PM · #41 |
Votes: 53
Views: 93
Avg Vote: 6.4717
Comments: 6
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
I'll enjoy it while it lasts. The trolls must've taken the blue pill for last night's activity and cant get up.
Message edited by author 2007-11-14 13:32:50.
|
|
|
|
11/14/2007 02:21:13 PM · #42 |
Originally posted by Marjo:
Originally posted by skewsme:
Originally posted by hotpasta:
Very disappointing...After voting, I rekon only about 5% really understood bokeh. Most were simply distracting out of focus foregrounds that had no rhyme or reason...there were about 4 or 5 standouts that got it |
Oh puleez hush, do you think dpc voters need extra reasons to vote down a photo with any kind of blur in the forground? |
I agree with Hotpasta. If the submissions didn't get the challege right, why shouldn't they be voted down? I stopped voting because after 20 or so I only saw one that captured it correctly. If we keep only voting because it's pretty, cute, beautiful, etc, etc, blah-blah and it doesn't even remotely meet the challenge, how the heck is anyone going to learn that the need to follow the rules and/or research the subject more before entering is an important aspect of this site. I'm fed up with being called DNMC police. I'm going to vote the way I see it. So there! |
Yeah, I think stopping voting was the right thing to do if you're feeling that itchy about issues as blurry as bokeh. |
|
|
|
11/14/2007 02:24:14 PM · #43 |
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
...................
:/
I feel much better now! |
|
|
|
11/14/2007 02:53:30 PM · #44 |
Originally posted by dmadden:
Votes: 53
Views: 93
Avg Vote: 6.4717
Comments: 6
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
I'll enjoy it while it lasts. The trolls must've taken the blue pill for last night's activity and cant get up. |
Looks like we are dancing again.
Votes: 51
Views: 86
Avg Vote: 6.4706
Comments: 2 |
|
|
|
11/14/2007 03:02:40 PM · #45 |
Originally posted by hywind:
Votes: 13
Views: 19
Avg Vote: 5.2308
Comments: 0
Opened with a 6.000, and then down went the thrill, What happened to the bokeh rings? so requested in background bokeh. |
Votes: 52
Views: 78
Avg Vote: 5.4423
Comments: 0
must be one of those I mentioned in my THREAD. I made the same error as many others.
Message edited by author 2007-11-14 16:15:09.
|
|
|
|
11/14/2007 03:18:10 PM · #46 |
rings only happens, if there are sparkly things like water, light etc. no sparkly things, no rings but STIL BOKEH DAMNED.
shut up and vote (not intend to  hywind directly) |
|
|
|
11/14/2007 03:26:12 PM · #47 |
I feel like a total lame brain since I did not read nor interprete the
Challenge discription correctly. I did just the opposite and am now paying for it with lots of DNMC comments. Thought of self-DQ'ing, but will chalk it up to a learning experience! At least I had fun with going out and getting the shots for what now has become the "figment of my stupidity' challenge.
Oh well. Score is my lowest ever 4.2 something :(
Good Luck Everyone Else! |
|
|
|
11/14/2007 03:35:49 PM · #48 |
Originally posted by timfythetoo:
Looks like we are dancing again.
|
I know! You have 2 left feet and u'r stepping on my toe again LOL :)
|
|
|
|
11/14/2007 04:01:54 PM · #49 |
Votes: 61
Views: 95
Avg Vote: 6.4262
Comments: 4
Maybe I can stick a little toe on the dance floor from here :-) |
|
|
|
11/14/2007 04:03:17 PM · #50 |
Originally posted by MaryO:
Votes: 61
Views: 95
Avg Vote: 6.4262
Comments: 4
Maybe I can stick a little toe on the dance floor from here :-) |
Gotta pick up the pace for this dance - ;)
Votes: 56
Views: 94
Avg Vote: 6.5536
Comments: 2 |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 10/01/2025 11:30:21 PM EDT.
