Author | Thread |
|
09/27/2007 01:36:24 PM · #26 |
Here's a good one.
Views: 1108
Favorites: 1 |
|
|
09/27/2007 03:42:41 PM · #27 |
Originally posted by drewbixcube: This shot was my 3rd most viewed (303 at time of post) but not a single soul left a comment! I was hopping it would make it to my #1 viewed spot without a single comment. Oh well, at least my commenter set another record for me...my first favorite!
I guess everyone else can stop holding their tongues! And if you are still holding your tongue...try saying "I want to eat an apple while on a pirate ship!"
Cheers!
-drew |
Shame you were so close to a record, also a shame a decent thread is now having to be marked as NSFW makes people not click on them to see whats inside.
MattO
|
|
|
09/27/2007 05:06:16 PM · #28 |
Originally posted by MattO: Shame you were so close to a record, also a shame a decent thread is now having to be marked as NSFW makes people not click on them to see whats inside.
MattO |
Yeah, I saw this morning that it was marked NSFW and thought, "How the hell did this happen?! It's a wedding ring...not a nipple ring!" :p
Oh well...and now I have 150% favorites to comments.
-drew |
|
|
09/27/2007 05:38:28 PM · #29 |
Originally posted by MattO:
...also a shame a decent thread is now having to be marked as NSFW makes people not click on them to see whats inside.
MattO |
Yeah right!
Thread views 727. I think it just may be the opposite. :-P |
|
|
09/27/2007 06:15:22 PM · #30 |
Originally posted by thegrandwazoo: Originally posted by MattO:
...also a shame a decent thread is now having to be marked as NSFW makes people not click on them to see whats inside.
MattO |
Yeah right!
Thread views 727. I think it just may be the opposite. :-P |
And imagine all the extra views it brings to the opening image. Oh woops...that was what this thread was about!
|
|
|
09/27/2007 06:24:18 PM · #31 |
I just hope no one got fired before we could update the thread title.
But whatever. I'm sure the adult content posts were made with the intention of increasing the OP's image view count, and not their own. |
|
|
09/27/2007 06:31:48 PM · #32 |
Originally posted by L2: I just hope no one got fired before we could update the thread title.
But whatever. I'm sure the adult content posts were made with the intention of increasing the OP's image view count, and not their own. |
Lets hope as I think it happened pretty quick. GeneralE seemed to be on top of it. I guess that the hands have been duly slapped.
So it seems the moral of the story is to not post any nudes in a thread unless already marked with "Not Work Safe"? I am just asking because surly we don't want the whole nude battle again. If we can't post nudes then so be it.
Stoopid work! :-P
ETA: Grammar
Message edited by author 2007-09-27 18:33:40. |
|
|
09/27/2007 06:38:04 PM · #33 |
Yes Wazza...I guess my hand has been slapped. I will not post nudes in an unmarked thread again. I have learnt my lesson. I hope OTHERS have too!!!
|
|
|
09/27/2007 06:39:27 PM · #34 |
If the thread title is already marked, thumbs are fine.
If the thread title is innocuous, a link with a warning in the individual post will work as well.
PS Wazz, if you've got anything you think I'd love to see, PM me! :) |
|
|
09/27/2007 06:41:16 PM · #35 |
|
|
09/27/2007 06:44:19 PM · #36 |
And comment left, for you and the OP! :) |
|
|
09/27/2007 06:44:44 PM · #37 |
I understand why you shouldn't be posting nudes like that but lets keep this in perspective. If someone got fired for images downloaded from this site (i.e. caught not working) it's their own fault and nobody elses. I should hope if that happens to anybody they don't come here blaming someone else for that.
|
|
|
09/27/2007 06:50:10 PM · #38 |
what happens when you open a nude photo at work? i mean in what sense is it not safe? because that warning sure makes it all the more tempting to see what does happen...
if it were just a surprise - i could legitmatly say so if caught. but being warned ahead of time - that might start a major moral break down...
|
|
|
09/27/2007 06:51:17 PM · #39 |
dammit yanko ! you can be fired ?
;}
|
|
|
09/27/2007 06:52:53 PM · #40 |
Originally posted by drewbixcube: New record! 100% comment to favorite ratio! |
I have that record on a zillion of my photos!
to name the one most NSFW :P
|
|
|
09/27/2007 06:54:03 PM · #41 |
Originally posted by Konador: Originally posted by drewbixcube: New record! 100% comment to favorite ratio! |
I have that record on a zillion of my photos!
to name the one most NSFW :P |
Oh now that could get me FIRED!! Why the heck isn't it a link only...god dammit!
Oh wait...I am the boss!! Yeah...go ahead...post more!
|
|
|
09/27/2007 06:57:17 PM · #42 |
So Lets get this straight
Firstly upload a nude photo to the Nude gallery
then to post it I need to mark the post 'Post Contains Adult Content' ( even thou right beside that is states, (there is no need to check this box if you're only posting an adult thumb)
But I can only do that if the thread title includes not safe for work?
What the hell?
So the save the slack asses looking at the site at work from changing their preferences to Hide Adult Content we have to do a 4 step check to make sure they are protected.
Do I have that right?
|
|
|
09/27/2007 07:00:04 PM · #43 |
Originally posted by Shadowi6: So Lets get this straight
Firstly upload a nude photo to the Nude gallery
then to post it I need to mark the post 'Post Contains Adult Content' ( even thou right beside that is states, (there is no need to check this box if you're only posting an adult thumb)
But I can only do that if the thread title includes not safe for work?
What the hell?
So the save the slack asses looking at the site at work from changing their preferences to Hide Adult Content we have to do a 4 step check to make sure they are protected.
Do I have that right? |
Yes you do...but....there is another rule. If you only post on this site twice in 3 years...then you are also allowed to post the 640x480 versions in your post...and host them off this site. Go figure. Any other images that are only slightly over the recommended size seemed to be ripped down.
|
|
|
09/27/2007 07:00:24 PM · #44 |
Originally posted by soup: dammit yanko ! you can be fired ?
;} |
Amazingly enough my boss thinks just like me. He's the bestest. ;)
|
|
|
09/27/2007 07:45:58 PM · #45 |
Originally posted by Judi: Originally posted by Shadowi6: So Lets get this straight
Firstly upload a nude photo to the Nude gallery
then to post it I need to mark the post 'Post Contains Adult Content' ( even thou right beside that is states, (there is no need to check this box if you're only posting an adult thumb)
But I can only do that if the thread title includes not safe for work?
What the hell?
So the save the slack asses looking at the site at work from changing their preferences to Hide Adult Content we have to do a 4 step check to make sure they are protected.
Do I have that right? |
Yes you do...but....there is another rule. If you only post on this site twice in 3 years...then you are also allowed to post the 640x480 versions in your post...and host them off this site. Go figure. Any other images that are only slightly over the recommended size seemed to be ripped down. |
Judi -- this post is divisive and anti-community. We are speaking with you privately about these issues. To post in this manner during an on-going discussion, where you have only half the facts and twice as many assumptions is painful and smacks of sour grapes.
To summarize: we're already talking about this with you, why post this if not just to undermine the harmony of the site and the discretion of Site Council to warn users of posts they may find offensive.
Lets keep this thread on topic, please.
Message edited by author 2007-09-27 19:47:33. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/11/2025 05:52:51 PM EDT.