Author | Thread |
|
09/08/2007 11:56:27 PM · #1 |
Just polling for some advice on what to do:
Situation: I'm outdoors on a sunny day. Part of the person's face is lit by the full sun, part is in shadow. I'm at an angle that puts the bright sky behind the subject.
Question #1: How would you size up this situation and what would you do to get a good photo when the subjects' lighting pans a large dynamic range (i.e. greater than 2 stops)
Question #2: Let me enhance the difficulty of the situation. The subject is moving towards me (on a merry-go-round). Now what would you do?
Thanks,
Paul |
|
|
09/09/2007 12:00:48 AM · #2 |
|
|
09/09/2007 12:13:59 AM · #3 |
Lets assume that I can't...in the merry-go-round case.
Let me also add that I can't "set-up" the shot. |
|
|
09/09/2007 12:15:07 AM · #4 |
Flash then, though in the merry-go-round case the lighting is going to be changing by the fraction of a second so good luck. |
|
|
09/09/2007 12:21:30 AM · #5 |
A - Shoot in good light
B - Add light where it isn't optimal (flash, reflector, lower ISO, etc)
C - Remove light that isn't optimal (screen, time of day, etc.)
D - Last resort - try to balance light in post processing - Photoshop.
The easiest answer here is A - shoot in good light. Don't shoot when the light is fighting against you. If you want the shot to really work, wait until the light is in your favor, or make it your favor.
|
|
|
09/09/2007 12:24:51 AM · #6 |
Change your position so the sun is behind you. |
|
|
09/09/2007 12:25:33 AM · #7 |
A reflector obviously isn't possible. A simple flash should do the job...
|
|
|
09/09/2007 12:48:56 AM · #8 |
The thought that immediately comes to my mind ... especially because of the carousel ... is that, people don't "expect" perfection out of every photograph! Sometimes you just can't control the light. Sometimes controlling the light might actually make the image look artificial!
A couple of quick examples from yesterday's wedding ... I made no attempt at perfect lighting here. It was, as you described, harsh sunlight on one part of the face and shadow on the either.
I think the image looks great. It could certainly be knocked as not being a "perfect portrait" of the couple. But in this situation, I don't think it had to be. Here is another from the same setting:
So... go ahead and use flash if you need to. But don't worry about the reflector. And don't worry that it isn't perfect. Save that for when you have control of the situation.
----
More from yesterday's wedding (plus the bridals and engagements shot in previous weeks) can be found here.
Message edited by author 2007-09-09 00:49:58.
|
|
|
09/09/2007 12:52:08 AM · #9 |
Fill flash for sure. Set to -1 or so looks more natural, because you can tell there is a difference in lighting, but it is almost even. |
|
|
09/09/2007 02:04:55 AM · #10 |
Thanks, this is exactly the situation I came across. I had absolutely no control of any light.
One question regarding the fill flash. If outdoors, do you recommend a diffuser?
Originally posted by dwterry: The thought that immediately comes to my mind ... especially because of the carousel ... is that, people don't "expect" perfection out of every photograph! Sometimes you just can't control the light. Sometimes controlling the light might actually make the image look artificial!
A couple of quick examples from yesterday's wedding ... I made no attempt at perfect lighting here. It was, as you described, harsh sunlight on one part of the face and shadow on the either.
I think the image looks great. It could certainly be knocked as not being a "perfect portrait" of the couple. But in this situation, I don't think it had to be. Here is another from the same setting:
So... go ahead and use flash if you need to. But don't worry about the reflector. And don't worry that it isn't perfect. Save that for when you have control of the situation.
----
More from yesterday's wedding (plus the bridals and engagements shot in previous weeks) can be found here. |
|
|
|
09/09/2007 08:55:08 AM · #11 |
bumping for more advice.... |
|
|
09/09/2007 09:08:43 AM · #12 |
I just got back from holidays and took loads of snapshots in bright sunshine with harsh shadows. The easiest solution I found was to set the flash to between -1.0 and -2.0 and shoot as normal. The 'weak' flash was just enough to soften the shadows and light up the dark half of the face.
The only exposure adjustment I made was to the flash power, to ensure it wasn't *too* bright. i.e. I only wanted the flash to lift the shadows and not appear as an unnatural light coming from a weird direction. |
|
|
09/09/2007 09:11:02 AM · #13 |
By -1 and -2 are you referring to dropping the AUTO flash setting by that number of stops? Whats the guide on your flash?
Thanks for the reply.
Paul
Originally posted by jhonan: I just got back from holidays and took loads of snapshots in bright sunshine with harsh shadows. The easiest solution I found was to set the flash to between -1.0 and -2.0 and shoot as normal. The 'weak' flash was just enough to soften the shadows and light up the dark half of the face.
The only exposure adjustment I made was to the flash power, to ensure it wasn't *too* bright. i.e. I only wanted the flash to lift the shadows and not appear as an unnatural light coming from a weird direction. |
|
|
|
09/09/2007 09:19:56 AM · #14 |
this is a great site for some information on how to use flash correctly
//planetneil.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/ |
|
|
09/09/2007 09:20:10 AM · #15 |
Tell the Dim-Lits to get into better light! ;) |
|
|
09/09/2007 09:27:05 AM · #16 |
Originally posted by PGerst: By -1 and -2 are you referring to dropping the AUTO flash setting by that number of stops? Whats the guide on your flash? |
The guide on mine is 17 m (55.7 ft).
I'm shooting mainly in P mode, and the D40 has a 'Flash Compensation' setting which goes from -3.0 to +3.0 and lets you set the output power of the on-camera flash. I found it was the laziest/easiest way to sort out shadows for snapshots. In a studio situation of course you can setup the shot, external flash, reflectors etc. But I just needed a quick and dirty solution for holiday snaps. I'm not sure if the 300D has a flash compensation setting. This site talks a bit about fooling the light meter into giving different power outputs.
|
|
|
09/09/2007 10:38:11 AM · #17 |
Originally posted by basssman7: Tell the Dim-Lits to get into better light! ;) |
LOL!!! Love it! :-)
|
|
|
09/09/2007 11:50:23 AM · #18 |
Obviously. But that is not always possible. The question was in regards on what to do when you can't control the light, or position of the subject.
A good photographer knows how to manage the uncontrollable...which is what I'm asking about.
Originally posted by basssman7: Tell the Dim-Lits to get into better light! ;) |
|
|
|
09/09/2007 11:52:15 AM · #19 |
Originally posted by PGerst: Obviously. But that is not always possible. The question was in regards on what to do when you can't control the light, or position of the subject.
A good photographer knows how to manage the uncontrollable...which is what I'm asking about.
Originally posted by basssman7: Tell the Dim-Lits to get into better light! ;) | |
Sorry, that was a joke. :) |
|
|
09/09/2007 11:52:23 AM · #20 |
Thank you. This is perfect! I've been neglectful in taking my flash when I'm shooting outdoors...obviously a mistake. Though, I could have used the on-camera flash to help compensate....
Thanks for the link.
Originally posted by scwalsh: this is a great site for some information on how to use flash correctly
//planetneil.com/tangents/flash-photography-techniques/ |
|
|
|
09/09/2007 11:53:03 AM · #21 |
No problem...sorry if I sounded rude...just got in from mowing the lawn and not in the right mind. :)
Originally posted by basssman7: Originally posted by PGerst: Obviously. But that is not always possible. The question was in regards on what to do when you can't control the light, or position of the subject.
A good photographer knows how to manage the uncontrollable...which is what I'm asking about.
Originally posted by basssman7: Tell the Dim-Lits to get into better light! ;) | |
Sorry, that was a joke. :) |
|
|
|
09/09/2007 11:55:47 AM · #22 |
Originally posted by PGerst: No problem...sorry if I sounded rude...just got in from mowing the lawn and not in the right mind. :) |
The killer for me was the pun on "Dim Lits" (i.e. Dim Wits). I'm going to have to remember that one! (still laughing, but then I'm a big fun of puns)
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/29/2025 02:01:12 PM EDT.