| Author | Thread | 
		
			|  | 08/02/2007 01:31:51 PM · #1 | 
		| | Want to buy a 10-20mm-(22mm) lens. Sigma or Canon. Price isn't really a factor here. Viewing shots taken with both lens on DPC - seems both look wonderful. Any opinions?
 Thanks for your help.
 Lyta
 
 Message edited by author 2007-08-02 13:35:36.
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 08/02/2007 01:37:32 PM · #2 | 
		| | Just got mine a couple of weeks ago (Canon)... love it!!! 
 From what I've researched, the Canon seems to be the way to go.... virtually zero barrel distortion!
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 08/02/2007 01:41:45 PM · #3 | 
		| | If price is not an issue, Canon is the obvious choice. As Lee said, the barrel distortion is negligible, and also the lens is remarkably flare-free when shooting into the sun, very important on an ultra wide angle lens. 
 R.
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 08/02/2007 02:05:45 PM · #4 | 
		| | Can't say anything about the Sigma since I've never used it, but I really like my Canon. Nice sharp little lens there. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 08/02/2007 02:14:34 PM · #5 | 
		| | Just got my Canon 10-22 from another DPC'er here a few months ago and I love it. What a great lens. Really nice clear pictures and I love that its a really wide lens I get alot more picture which is what I really needed and wanted. Really cant say nothing bad about it. 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 08/02/2007 02:18:29 PM · #6 | 
		| | I love my Canon, but have seen some good stuff from the Sigma here. I'm still partial to the Canon though. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 08/02/2007 02:19:21 PM · #7 | 
		| | I have the Sigma with a Nikon mount and really enjoy it! [/url]
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 08/02/2007 02:39:46 PM · #8 | 
		| | I have been using the canon lens for over an year...it's simply awesome and opens up my 20D for true wide angle photography. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 08/02/2007 02:42:32 PM · #9 | 
		| | I haven't shot with the Canon, but I have been extremely happy with my Sigma 10-20...  I chose it because it will work on any of the Canon APS-C sized sensor cameras.  It's not limited to the Camera bodies that support EF-S lenses. 
 Message edited by author 2007-08-02 14:43:17.
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 08/02/2007 02:45:29 PM · #10 | 
		| | Just something to consider: If you're ever moving to a full frame body (Canon 5D, 1D, or a film camera) you may want to consider that neither of those lenses (both being EF-S) will work.  The Sigma 12-24 will. 
 Perhaps not important to you, though.
 
 Edit:  John - it looks like what you're saying is the Sigma 10-20 would work on a 5D?
 
 Hmm - it seems some folks express concern about using the Sigma 10-20 on a FF body, but people are doing it.
 
 Message edited by author 2007-08-02 14:50:50.
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 08/02/2007 02:59:22 PM · #11 | 
		| | I love my 10-22.  Versatile little lens and sturdy. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 08/02/2007 03:09:36 PM · #12 | 
		| | | Originally posted by smurfguy: Edit:  John - it looks like what you're saying is the Sigma 10-20 would work on a 5D?
 
 Hmm - it seems some folks express concern about using the Sigma 10-20 on a FF body, but people are doing it.
 | 
 
 You can use the Sigma lens on a FF body since it just has a standard EF mount but it cause severe vignetting at all focal lengths.  The Canon lens will not even mount to a FF body since the design of the lens would cause the mirror to smash into the back of the lens.  The Sigma lens has a standard mount, as said before, but casts a much smaller image circle.
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 08/02/2007 03:11:05 PM · #13 | 
		| | I have the canon and love it.  f3.5 is great.  Used it to capture Aurora in Alaska. 
 | 
 | 
			Home -
			
Challenges -
			
Community -
			
League -
			
Photos -
			
Cameras -
			
Lenses -
			
Learn -
			
			
Help -
			
Terms of Use -
			
Privacy -
			
Top ^
		DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
		
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
		
Current Server Time: 10/31/2025 01:00:41 PM EDT.