| Author | Thread |
|
|
06/06/2007 10:01:20 PM · #1 |
| Really, it's long overdue. |
|
|
|
06/06/2007 10:02:32 PM · #2 |
But make sure it's a member challenge, because if it's an open we will have the obvious "guys kissing guys" as the other option. I don't wanna see that.
|
|
|
|
06/06/2007 10:02:48 PM · #3 |
How about you kiss a guy first. :P
|
|
|
|
06/06/2007 10:02:49 PM · #4 |
But then someone will recomend it be an exclusive open challenge with Guys Kissing Guys and who'd wanna vote on that one?
|
|
|
|
06/06/2007 10:05:12 PM · #5 |
I agree, long overdue.
All in favor??
|
|
|
|
06/06/2007 10:05:32 PM · #6 |
|
|
|
06/06/2007 10:06:34 PM · #7 |
| add "nude" and im all for it... |
|
|
|
06/06/2007 10:11:50 PM · #8 |
| I think I could showhorn a flower shot into that. Let's do it! |
|
|
|
06/06/2007 10:13:43 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by option:
add "nude" and im all for it... |
 |
|
|
|
06/06/2007 10:15:04 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by idnic:
Not a chance in hell. :P |
BS, you'll do anything for a shot at the ribbon!
|
|
|
|
06/06/2007 10:20:26 PM · #11 |
psshh. Not unless this is a gay rights challenge.
Otherwise may I direct you the the feminism thread.
;) |
|
|
|
06/06/2007 10:20:29 PM · #12 |
Better add an extra rule that says failing to submit a photo of said subject is grounds for DQ. You just can't trust  Brad or fotomann_forever in such a challenge. :P |
|
|
|
06/06/2007 10:21:33 PM · #13 |
Originally posted by yanko:
Better add an extra rule that says failing to submit a photo of said subject is grounds for DQ. You just can't trust Brad or fotomann_forever in such a challenge. :P |
+ no cheese |
|
|
|
06/06/2007 10:21:47 PM · #14 |
Originally posted by escapetooz:
psshh. Not unless this is a gay rights challenge.
|
Call it what ya will, girls kissing girls is HAWT!
|
|
|
|
06/06/2007 10:24:27 PM · #15 |
Originally posted by fotomann_forever:
Originally posted by escapetooz:
psshh. Not unless this is a gay rights challenge.
|
Call it what ya will, girls kissing girls is HAWT! |
certainly |
|
|
|
06/06/2007 10:25:27 PM · #16 |
DNMC, read the challenge desc damn it. |
|
|
|
06/06/2007 10:26:20 PM · #17 |
Originally posted by routerguy666:
DNMC, read the challenge desc damn it. |
yeesh. I'm sorry, I should have waited for the kiss, guess I got a little anxious. |
|
|
|
06/06/2007 10:28:57 PM · #18 |
Originally posted by routerguy666:
DNMC, read the challenge desc damn it. |
yeah, those 2 don't qualify as "girls" anymore, me thinks. |
|
|
|
06/06/2007 10:30:00 PM · #19 |
Originally posted by DrAchoo:
But make sure it's a member challenge... |
But, but... they don't *have* members! |
|
|
|
06/06/2007 10:30:00 PM · #20 |
Originally posted by crayon:
Originally posted by routerguy666:
DNMC, read the challenge desc damn it. |
yeah, those 2 don't qualify as "girls" anymore, me thinks. |
me thinks if it was a "girls" kissing girls challenge we might have a little bit of child exploitation on our hands. |
|
|
|
06/06/2007 10:31:31 PM · #21 |
Originally posted by crayon:
Originally posted by routerguy666:
DNMC, read the challenge desc damn it. |
yeah, those 2 don't qualify as "girls" anymore, me thinks. |
Yeah they do. I wonder how it would score actually. If they were kissing, I mean. |
|
|
|
06/06/2007 10:33:37 PM · #22 |
Originally posted by routerguy666:
Originally posted by crayon:
Originally posted by routerguy666:
DNMC, read the challenge desc damn it. |
yeah, those 2 don't qualify as "girls" anymore, me thinks. |
Yeah they do. I wonder how it would score actually. If they were kissing, I mean. |
hmmm moral dilema. I would score it very well but I fear I'm in the minority on that one. |
|
|
|
06/06/2007 10:34:11 PM · #23 |
Originally posted by routerguy666:
Originally posted by crayon:
Originally posted by routerguy666:
DNMC, read the challenge desc damn it. |
yeah, those 2 don't qualify as "girls" anymore, me thinks. |
Yeah they do. I wonder how it would score actually. If they were kissing, I mean. |
won't be too hard to guess... unless the technicals were perfect, then maybe a 3 LOL! |
|
|
|
06/06/2007 10:36:00 PM · #24 |
Originally posted by escapetooz:
Originally posted by routerguy666:
Originally posted by crayon:
Originally posted by routerguy666:
DNMC, read the challenge desc damn it. |
yeah, those 2 don't qualify as "girls" anymore, me thinks. |
Yeah they do. I wonder how it would score actually. If they were kissing, I mean. |
hmmm moral dilema. I would score it very well but I fear I'm in the minority on that one. |
would you score higher if to sympathize the subjects/models? |
|
|
|
06/06/2007 10:36:02 PM · #25 |
Originally posted by routerguy666:
Originally posted by crayon:
Originally posted by routerguy666:
DNMC, read the challenge desc damn it. |
yeah, those 2 don't qualify as "girls" anymore, me thinks. |
Yeah they do. I wonder how it would score actually. If they were kissing, I mean. |
Technicals and comp aren't that good ;-)
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/05/2025 08:28:52 AM EDT.
