| Author | Thread |
|
|
12/15/2006 03:09:11 AM · #76 |
hmmm.... my gamble seems to be paying off.
Numbers keep rising - me likes! :)) |
|
|
|
12/15/2006 03:12:05 AM · #77 |
Originally posted by BradP:
hmmm.... my gamble seems to be paying off.
Numbers keep rising - me likes! :)) |
rut-rohhh!
He's BACCCCCCCCCCK?
R.
|
|
|
|
12/15/2006 03:14:20 AM · #78 |
Lots of really cool application of the expert rules and I agree: I hope they stay. There's one or two that remind me of Scott Mutter's work or perhaps Jerry Uelsmann. (I happen to LOVE that kind of photo-art).
|
|
|
|
12/15/2006 03:15:57 AM · #79 |
Mine just started dropping...don't make me go back through and re-evaluate. Now, bump mine up. It's the one with the sky in it.
|
|
|
|
12/15/2006 03:16:51 AM · #80 |
Originally posted by Citadel:
Lots of really cool application of the expert rules and I agree: I hope they stay. There's one or two that remind me of Scott Mutter's work or perhaps Jerry Uelsmann. (I happen to LOVE that kind of photo-art). |
Jerry Uelsmann, of course, did it all in the conventional darkroom. I just admire the HELL out of that guy :-) He was absolutely ground-breaking.
R.
|
|
|
|
12/15/2006 03:18:20 AM · #81 |
Originally posted by ericwoo:
Mine just started dropping...don't make me go back through and re-evaluate. Now, bump mine up. It's the one with the sky in it. |
Oh, THAT one? I gave it a 4 'cuz it had too much sky. Almost all the shots have too much sky, except for the ones that don't have enough. The single exception is my shot, which has the perfect balance between sky and not-sky :-)
R.
|
|
|
|
12/15/2006 03:55:52 AM · #82 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
Originally posted by ericwoo:
Mine just started dropping...don't make me go back through and re-evaluate. Now, bump mine up. It's the one with the sky in it. |
Oh, THAT one? I gave it a 4 'cuz it had too much sky. Almost all the shots have too much sky, except for the ones that don't have enough. The single exception is my shot, which has the perfect balance between sky and not-sky :-)
R. |
saw that one couldnt decide if it met challenge criteria or not..........being not one thing or the other, so left it in the too hard category |
|
|
|
12/15/2006 04:39:33 AM · #83 |
Wow - I got a wish list! Thats a first for me. Do you think that person will take me up on it as I actually have that one ready to go as a print! I will make a deal with any wish listers - I will set the price for 50 cents over cost after the challenge for two days only! (Why 50 cents you ask - a man has got to make a living somehow).
SCore wise - since this thread has gotten a little off topic - is a 6.9. Rock on!!!
|
|
|
|
12/15/2006 09:28:44 AM · #84 |
Votes: 65
Views: 103
Avg Vote: 6.1231
Comments: 2
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 12/15/06 09:28 am
not to shabby...:) |
|
|
|
12/15/2006 10:19:53 AM · #85 |
Votes: 80
Views: 159
Avg Vote: 6.7250
Comments: 7
Favorites: 1
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 12/15/06 10:19 am
:-D
|
|
|
|
12/15/2006 10:22:40 AM · #86 |
Votes: 74
Views: 159
Avg Vote: 6.9459
Comments: 7
Favorites: 1
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 12/15/06 10:22 am
|
|
|
|
12/15/2006 10:25:16 AM · #87 |
Originally posted by Citadel:
Lots of really cool application of the expert rules and I agree: I hope they stay. There's one or two that remind me of Scott Mutter's work or perhaps Jerry Uelsmann. (I happen to LOVE that kind of photo-art). |
exactly!! Jerry Uelsmann, I'm extremely curious about who the photographer is:) it is one of my faves in the challenge. |
|
|
|
12/15/2006 10:27:04 AM · #88 |
I love the ruleset and really enjoyed this challenge. As someone who has painted, I know that "anything goes" does NOT make things easier.
Sky
Votes: 70
Views: 144
Avg Vote: 5.5000
Comments: 4
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 12/15/06 10:21 am
|
|
|
|
12/15/2006 10:33:05 AM · #89 |
| I'm still f-ing blown away. I keep going back over and over them in pure awe. What a delicious bit of eye candy. WOW Way to go folks!! |
|
|
|
12/15/2006 10:41:20 AM · #90 |
| I just finished voting. These shots are amazing. It was a joy voting this time. Great job everyone!!! I am going to go back and try and comment on more of them. |
|
|
|
12/15/2006 10:45:45 AM · #91 |
me too!!!! .... (a wish list)
I'm not ready to print - I always down-size then make a few final alts ... stoohpeeeed!
ps:7.6 (it can't maintain this ... can it?)
Originally posted by timfythetoo:
Wow - I got a wish list! Thats a first for me. Do you think that person will take me up on it as I actually have that one ready to go as a print! I will make a deal with any wish listers - I will set the price for 50 cents over cost after the challenge for two days only! (Why 50 cents you ask - a man has got to make a living somehow).
SCore wise - since this thread has gotten a little off topic - is a 6.9. Rock on!!! |
|
|
|
|
12/15/2006 10:45:57 AM · #92 |
Wow, there are so many awesome entries in this challenge! I think the winners are going to have some really high scores!
|
|
|
|
12/15/2006 10:47:52 AM · #93 |
Originally posted by metatate:
me too!!!! .... (a wish list)
I'm not ready to print - I always down-size then make a few final alts ... stoohpeeeed!
ps:7.6 (it can't maintain this ... can it?) |
Well done Tate! Just went for a walk to the playground with the kids and came back to a 7.1+. I am having the week of my DPC life! I dont expect this to be in the top 5 but I would gladly take another non ribbon 7 to add to my pile.
|
|
|
|
12/15/2006 10:48:34 AM · #94 |
Votes: 81
Views: 161
Avg Vote: 7.2593
Comments: 9
Favorites: 1
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 12/15/06 10:47 am
|
|
|
|
12/15/2006 11:13:27 AM · #95 |
Originally posted by ericwoo:
Originally posted by fotomann_forever:
Originally posted by ericwoo:
it is official. I hate the results that this challeng yielded. |
Why is that? |
While there are some nice entries, this just isn't photography to me. I am just not a big composite fan. |
I have to agree with you there, I don't like it. I came to DPC because it was a photography site, this challenge is turning DPC into another "Worth1000" site. ICK!
|
|
|
|
12/15/2006 11:16:34 AM · #96 |
Votes: 85
Views: 137
Avg Vote: 5.3294
Comments: 3
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
|
|
|
|
12/15/2006 11:16:43 AM · #97 |
I started to vote but got bored quickly - I am not at 20% and will likely just let it lapse since my votes are probably not fair anyway. Sorry guys but there is only a couple of images that I even could call photos - most are just digital art to me and I just don't have the interest.
|
|
|
|
12/15/2006 11:24:25 AM · #98 |
In my voting, I've come across both some phenomenal images and some stuff I'd hope never to see on DPC again. I adjusted my votes accordingly. :) But I definitely feel like there is some very cool stuff in there.
|
|
|
|
12/15/2006 11:52:36 AM · #99 |
I am sure I am not going to play in the next "Expert" Challenge as I can see that it makes no sense to have it if most are biased against the results. Might as well just keep it "Basic" and "Advanced". Not to expect digital art in this challenge is silly. I mean really with that rule set. I know mine was pushing the limits but I thought that was the idea I guess not.
I contemplated a self DQ but nah I am gonna wait and see if anyone gets the reference to my image. I am really disappointed that Routerguy666 missed it completely. :-P
Well that's my .02 come on 4's LOL |
|
|
|
12/15/2006 12:10:58 PM · #100 |
how strange, I haven't seen any "digital art" in this challenge yet. as I see digital art is when something is flying somewhere with lttle green men in the open space with angels and demons with lion heads around and a ghost ship on fire falling into parts which look like butterflies. :)
I would say I have seen many beautiful sunsets in this challenge and more than usual pieces of really original creative art (hmmm:) it is digital anyway since we use digital technics)
I really regret I was not in this firt challenge with expert rules but I will definitely be in the next one! (I only hope I won't get dq again til that time:) |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/07/2025 09:26:02 PM EDT.
