| Author | Thread |
|
|
11/29/2006 11:04:08 PM · #26 |
|
|
|
11/29/2006 11:10:56 PM · #27 |
94 challenges, no DQ of any kind.
|
|
|
|
11/29/2006 11:18:34 PM · #28 |
| 142 + one challenges entered, no DQ. I've only had two voting period validation requests, for the User Name challenge, and my Fireworks for the August Free Study. |
|
|
|
11/29/2006 11:33:49 PM · #29 |
87 challenges, no DQs.
it's funny to me to see yet another thread where people who do not qualify for the OP post anyway. This is one of the few achievements I have made! :P
|
|
|
|
11/29/2006 11:42:47 PM · #30 |
83 and a virgin. (Though I was validated once!)
=O |
|
|
|
11/30/2006 12:32:37 AM · #31 |
Entered - 156 Challenges
DQ's - 1
Challenges entered since DQ - 115
First Challenge entered - July 2005 (16 months)
|
|
|
|
11/30/2006 12:50:51 AM · #32 |
noooooo DQs fo meeh! 55 entries~
::knock on wood::
:)
|
|
|
|
11/30/2006 01:15:37 AM · #33 |
| 127 Challenges, zero DQ's ;-) |
|
|
|
11/30/2006 01:48:56 AM · #34 |
166 challenges, and just got my third DQ. hmmm.
|
|
|
|
11/30/2006 03:06:37 AM · #35 |
Never in a 100 challenges, never been asked for the file, besides the three times I won a ribbon.
|
|
|
|
11/30/2006 03:35:18 AM · #36 |
Originally posted by shannylee13:
::knock on wood:: |
 |
|
|
|
11/30/2006 05:04:09 AM · #37 |
108 +1 -no DQ's.
I have been violated...I mean validated a couple of times :-)
|
|
|
|
11/30/2006 05:04:42 AM · #38 |
140 Challenges, 1 DQ and 1 Self DQ, both from 4th place :-(
both for using an adjustment layer in the wrong blending mode - doh!!
|
|
|
|
11/30/2006 05:06:14 AM · #39 |
| DQ'ed 2 times and proud of it! |
|
|
|
11/30/2006 05:09:41 AM · #40 |
| I have just come here to dpc and 2 already:) yeah... |
|
|
|
11/30/2006 06:14:21 AM · #41 |
Originally posted by larryslights:
Originally posted by crayon:
all we need to do now is randomly pick an OLD entry from someone in this "clean list" and request for a validation... hehehehe. Hope you all still have your age-old originals and remember the editing steps! MUAHAHAHAHA *evil laughter* |
Which raises the question...WHAT IS the statute of limitations on validations? |
There isn't one. According to the Challenge Rules, voters can only request DQ on an image up until the end of the Results Phase for the challenge to which the image was entered (a week after voting ends), but that rule does not limit the Site Council's ability to request proof. That said, it's exceedingly rare for us to request an original on an older entry.
~Terry
|
|
|
|
11/30/2006 06:18:22 AM · #42 |
Originally posted by banmorn:
319 challenges + 2 on going. I thought I had a DQ in the Chaos Challenge of '04 but I can't find any record of it....so yes and no. |
You did. Since the rules at the time of that challenge called for disqualified images to be hidden from results, it's not visible in your profile.
~Terry
|
|
|
|
11/30/2006 07:45:57 AM · #43 |
|
|
|
11/30/2006 09:18:51 AM · #44 |
Originally posted by ClubJuggle:
Originally posted by larryslights:
Originally posted by crayon:
all we need to do now is randomly pick an OLD entry from someone in this "clean list" and request for a validation... hehehehe. Hope you all still have your age-old originals and remember the editing steps! MUAHAHAHAHA *evil laughter* |
Which raises the question...WHAT IS the statute of limitations on validations? |
There isn't one. According to the Challenge Rules, voters can only request DQ on an image up until the end of the Results Phase for the challenge to which the image was entered (a week after voting ends), but that rule does not limit the Site Council's ability to request proof. That said, it's exceedingly rare for us to request an original on an older entry.
~Terry |
So what you are saying is, if we run across an image that for whatever reason we find suspicious, we can't request validation beyond seven days? Do we alert the Site Council to the image, or do they get a pass because Site Council didn't find it? I have several images in my mind that have photographer's notes that clearly state that they used steps that I have been told are not legal. I also ran across two ribbon winners from 2002 that show exposure dates in 2000 & 2001 (but I guess they would have been validated at the time?).
I'm not trying to be a PITA, I'm just curious.
EDIT - and, 51 completed challenges, 2 running and 1 more yet to start and no DQ's. One validation request during a challenge.
Message edited by author 2006-11-30 09:19:58.
|
|
|
|
11/30/2006 09:37:41 AM · #45 |
Originally posted by ClubJuggle:
Originally posted by banmorn:
319 challenges + 2 on going. I thought I had a DQ in the Chaos Challenge of '04 but I can't find any record of it....so yes and no. |
You did. Since the rules at the time of that challenge called for disqualified images to be hidden from results, it's not visible in your profile.
~Terry |
Thought so. Thx!
|
|
|
|
11/30/2006 09:44:51 AM · #46 |
Originally posted by larryslights:
I have several images in my mind that have photographer's notes that clearly state that they used steps that I have been told are not legal. I also ran across two ribbon winners from 2002 that show exposure dates in 2000 & 2001 (but I guess they would have been validated at the time?).
|
Remember, the rules haven't always been what they are now. When DPC first started, there was no one week limitation. |
|
|
|
11/30/2006 01:33:42 PM · #47 |
Originally posted by larryslights:
So what you are saying is, if we run across an image that for whatever reason we find suspicious, we can't request validation beyond seven days? Do we alert the Site Council to the image, or do they get a pass because Site Council didn't find it? I have several images in my mind that have photographer's notes that clearly state that they used steps that I have been told are not legal. I also ran across two ribbon winners from 2002 that show exposure dates in 2000 & 2001 (but I guess they would have been validated at the time?).
I'm not trying to be a PITA, I'm just curious. |
You can always share your concerns with Site Council via a ticket; just understand that our actions will most likely be more limited than they would have been had the images been reported in a timely manner. We have to consider that lots of things can happen to an original in 5 years, and also that some previously very active users no longer use the site at all, and no longer keep their contact information current with us. Consider, for example, if someone raised a question on one of  kimbly's photos. We have no way to reach her to request an original, but it wouldn't really be fair to DQ for non-response, either.
We also need to consider that the rules, camera technology, and evidentiary standards were all different in 2002. As one example, many cameras did not support EXIF, and we did not at that time DQ for EXIF dates outside the challenge dates. Later abuses caused us to change that, but we don't apply rule changes retroactively.
~Terry
Message edited by author 2006-11-30 13:50:42.
|
|
|
|
11/30/2006 01:36:08 PM · #48 |
I've had two validation requests and zero DQs.
|
|
|
|
11/30/2006 01:38:23 PM · #49 |
14 challenges zero DQ's. Then again, how much editing can you really do on an Etch-A-Sketch?
=)
|
|
|
|
11/30/2006 01:49:13 PM · #50 |
I was DQ'd with this..then reinstated after a week...many thanks to  scalvert and  kirbic
other than that, I have a clean record after 79 challenges... |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/21/2025 07:09:04 AM EDT.
