| Author | Thread |
|
|
07/20/2006 04:58:17 PM · #101 |
Originally posted by Megatherian:
As long as it came from the same shot then yes, it's legal. |
That's right -- you are still limited to one original file, but otherwise it's legal. |
|
|
|
07/20/2006 05:08:11 PM · #102 |
Originally posted by GeneralE:
Originally posted by Megatherian:
As long as it came from the same shot then yes, it's legal. |
That's right -- you are still limited to one original file, but otherwise it's legal. |
I have done this many times in advanced challenges. It's quite legal.
|
|
|
|
07/20/2006 05:23:45 PM · #103 |
Originally posted by DrAchoo:
Originally posted by GeneralE:
Originally posted by Megatherian:
As long as it came from the same shot then yes, it's legal. |
That's right -- you are still limited to one original file, but otherwise it's legal. |
I have done this many times in advanced challenges. It's quite legal. |
And here I am not doing it like a sucker! :)
Thanks |
|
|
|
07/20/2006 05:24:06 PM · #104 |
Originally posted by gayle43103:
Hey you have a good point there...I wouldn't want my entire photo to have a gaussian blur. You'd have to select certain areas for that. Hmmm...something to ponder.
g |
Well, since we are downsizing to a 640xx image applying a bit of guassian blur at full size could reduce noise. After sharpening at web-size, most poeple wouldn't know you had blurred the image at all, if your were careful.
Edit : Also, blurring on specific channels is legal and can be real helpful in reducing noise.
Message edited by author 2006-07-20 17:25:06.
|
|
|
|
07/20/2006 05:32:44 PM · #105 |
Originally posted by Elvis_L:
And here I am not doing it like a sucker! :)
Thanks |
Not such a sucker. It's not really documented anywhere...the only place it's been mentioned as being legal is in the forums. I suspect you're in the majority. |
|
|
|
07/20/2006 06:14:51 PM · #106 |
Originally posted by mk:
Originally posted by Elvis_L:
And here I am not doing it like a sucker! :)
Thanks |
Not such a sucker. It's not really documented anywhere...the only place it's been mentioned as being legal is in the forums. I suspect you're in the majority. |
The truth is only a minority of shots would even benefit from such a treatment.
|
|
|
|
07/20/2006 06:16:31 PM · #107 |
Originally posted by DrAchoo:
Originally posted by mk:
Originally posted by Elvis_L:
And here I am not doing it like a sucker! :)
Thanks |
Not such a sucker. It's not really documented anywhere...the only place it's been mentioned as being legal is in the forums. I suspect you're in the majority. |
The truth is only a minority of shots would even benefit from such a treatment. |
Unless you're a sunset-shooting dude like me, when dynamic range is an absolute priority...
R.
|
|
|
|
07/20/2006 06:30:10 PM · #108 |
| I learn something new every day. I had no idea you could do that in advance editing. Would be nice if those that had been doing that would document it in their photographer comments... ;) |
|
|
|
07/20/2006 06:34:34 PM · #109 |
Originally posted by yanko:
I learn something new every day. I had no idea you could do that in advance editing. Would be nice if those that had been doing that would document it in their photographer comments... ;) |
Like this?  (Not my photo!)
Message edited by author 2006-07-20 18:35:23. |
|
|
|
07/20/2006 06:54:09 PM · #110 |
| Ah ok. I guess I never read the comments on that one before. Too wordy. :P |
|
|
|
07/20/2006 07:13:16 PM · #111 |
Originally posted by yanko:
I learn something new every day. I had no idea you could do that in advance editing. Would be nice if those that had been doing that would document it in their photographer comments... ;) |
When I do do it, I document it. My attack mode of choice is contrast masking, though. I think I've only entered one challenge with an HDR image. It's something I'm still playing with.
R.
|
|
|
|
07/31/2006 11:49:19 PM · #112 |
Bear
I don't know if you are aware that some who do HDR images recommend the use of Photomatix and FDRTools. I am just starting to look at this process myself. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 06/05/2025 08:39:59 PM EDT.
