| Author | Thread |
|
|
07/12/2006 01:19:29 AM · #1 |
| The image previously in 5th place in the "Stationary" challenge was disqualified because of spot editing. Congratulations to Eric Snook (anmldoc) on 5th place. |
|
|
|
07/12/2006 01:23:04 AM · #2 |
Ooooops, I thought you meant "stationery"! I nearly keeled over in my chair! I didn't do any spot editing! WHOOOOO, geesh, that was quite an upset for a minute there!
Message edited by author 2006-07-12 01:24:30. |
|
|
|
07/12/2006 01:24:22 AM · #3 |
Originally posted by maestro:
WHAT spot editing! I didn't do any spot editing! |
dude! not you. just chill :)
Message edited by author 2006-07-12 01:24:51. |
|
|
|
07/12/2006 01:24:33 AM · #4 |
Originally posted by maestro:
WHAT spot editing! I didn't do any spot editing! |
Maestro....wrong stationary....er...stationery....er...oh crap...wrong challenge! |
|
|
|
07/12/2006 01:25:19 AM · #5 |
Originally posted by Rikki:
Originally posted by maestro:
WHAT spot editing! I didn't do any spot editing! |
dude! not you. just chill :) |
I'm sorry. My eyes went cross eyed for a minute there and I fell off my seat. My bad. :( |
|
|
|
07/12/2006 01:26:23 AM · #6 |
Originally posted by Rikki:
Originally posted by maestro:
WHAT spot editing! I didn't do any spot editing! |
dude! not you. just chill :)
|
Awwwww man. That sucks. What a gorgeous image to. I gave that one a really high score. Still a wonderful photo though and a keeper for my favs. |
|
|
|
07/12/2006 01:30:21 AM · #7 |
LOL at the panic over spelling :-))
|
|
|
|
07/12/2006 01:30:30 AM · #8 |
| I don't understand. The photographer says it's only his second entry in 2 years. He registered in 2003 and this is his only entry on his bio page. What gives? |
|
|
|
07/12/2006 01:33:19 AM · #9 |
| woohoo!...well that was unexpected...it is a very beautiful image--regardless of how edited, but I'll still take my 5th place. |
|
|
|
07/12/2006 01:34:30 AM · #10 |
Originally posted by fotomann_forever:
LOL at the panic over spelling :-)) |
I'm so embarrassed. *blush*
Congrats to the new 5th placer!
Message edited by author 2006-07-12 01:35:07. |
|
|
|
07/12/2006 07:16:59 AM · #11 |
Basic Editing???
 
Looks like burning/dodging to me!,Hope I'm wrong :-) |
|
|
|
07/12/2006 07:20:42 AM · #12 |
Originally posted by Judi:
I don't understand. The photographer says it's only his second entry in 2 years. He registered in 2003 and this is his only entry on his bio page. What gives? |
not everybody who registers at the site participates fully. some don't even participate at all. this guy probably just decided to get active... |
|
|
|
07/12/2006 07:23:37 AM · #13 |
| Yeah I noticed that most of the top images look like there out of bounds with the rules... |
|
|
|
07/12/2006 07:38:45 AM · #14 |
Originally posted by pitsaman:
Basic Editing???
Looks like burning/dodging to me!,Hope I'm wrong :-) |
I think that's an assumption based on lack of imagination about how one might achieve a range of effects at the time of the shoot. Vignetting (as in bryanbrazil's entry can easily be achieved (accidentally or deliberately) by using the wider end of a lens that's too wide for the body, by screwing on too many filters to the front of the lens and or even by using a filter with vignette applied to it. The dark sky in structor's shot could have been achieved with a polariser or graduated ND filter. It's a shame neither photographer entered any information on how they created their images but assuming they have been post processed is a bit of a jump at this stage.
|
|
|
|
07/12/2006 08:21:05 AM · #15 |
Originally posted by Kavey:
It's a shame neither photographer entered any information on how they created their images but assuming they have been post processed is a bit of a jump at this stage. |
ditto! it's best just to request validation and see what shakes out... |
|
|
|
07/12/2006 09:00:27 AM · #16 |
Originally posted by skiprow:
Originally posted by Kavey:
It's a shame neither photographer entered any information on how they created their images but assuming they have been post processed is a bit of a jump at this stage. |
ditto! it's best just to request validation and see what shakes out... |
They both finished top 5, they automatically get sent request for validation.
MattO
|
|
|
|
07/12/2006 10:06:29 AM · #17 |
Originally posted by pitsaman:
Basic Editing???
Looks like burning/dodging to me!,Hope I'm wrong :-) |
i as postprocessing master :-) think that this is very possible with basic editing guidelines
ummm ... lemmethink ... nothing else |
|
|
|
07/12/2006 10:08:45 AM · #18 |
Originally posted by gooc:
Originally posted by pitsaman:
Basic Editing???
Looks like burning/dodging to me!,Hope I'm wrong :-) |
i as postprocessing master :-) think that this is very possible with basic editing guidelines
ummm ... lemmethink ... nothing else |
Yup, both look legal to me. I don't see obvious dodging/burning, just looks like good clean shot and good clean processing. (and probably a gradient filter on that first one - on the camera)
|
|
|
|
07/12/2006 10:27:20 AM · #19 |
For the sunrise image, the vignetting was achieved by using the Selective Color tool to increase the black level on the black channel. The deep reds were a result of aggressive use of Shadow/Highlights tool and Hue/Saturation on the various color channels.
Hope that helps,
Bryan
Originally posted by pitsaman:
Basic Editing???
Looks like burning/dodging to me!,Hope I'm wrong :-) |
|
|
|
|
07/12/2006 10:28:57 AM · #20 |
|
|
|
07/12/2006 10:55:04 AM · #21 |
I'm glad nobody questions my entry. I guess a big blob of sensor dust helps :)
|
|
|
|
07/12/2006 11:23:45 AM · #22 |
Great explanation Kavita! The vignetting was mostly the result of multiple graduated neutral density filters. I've added all my editing steps to the image description.
Originally posted by Kavey:
Originally posted by pitsaman:
Basic Editing???
Looks like burning/dodging to me!,Hope I'm wrong :-) |
I think that's an assumption based on lack of imagination about how one might achieve a range of effects at the time of the shoot. Vignetting (as in bryanbrazil's entry can easily be achieved (accidentally or deliberately) by using the wider end of a lens that's too wide for the body, by screwing on too many filters to the front of the lens and or even by using a filter with vignette applied to it. The dark sky in structor's shot could have been achieved with a polariser or graduated ND filter. It's a shame neither photographer entered any information on how they created their images but assuming they have been post processed is a bit of a jump at this stage. |
|
|
|
|
07/12/2006 11:36:04 AM · #23 |
Originally posted by ltsimring:
I'm glad nobody questions my entry. I guess a big blob of sensor dust helps :) |
Yeah, that usually helps to let voters know it is legal :-)
|
|
|
|
07/12/2006 12:38:02 PM · #24 |
Originally posted by ltsimring:
I'm glad nobody questions my entry. I guess a big blob of sensor dust helps :) |
I noticed that but it didn't bother me. However, that is the funkiest looking sensor dust I have ever seen.
|
|
|
|
07/12/2006 02:15:45 PM · #25 |
Originally posted by dudephil:
Originally posted by ltsimring:
I'm glad nobody questions my entry. I guess a big blob of sensor dust helps :) |
I noticed that but it didn't bother me. However, that is the funkiest looking sensor dust I have ever seen. |
i haven't seen anything like that before, too. I suspect it is a tiny hair out of focus there.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/05/2025 07:16:17 PM EDT.
