| Author | Thread |
|
|
06/21/2006 12:21:06 AM · #1 |
It seems a lot of my commentors were more afraid for the health oof my laptop, than about the photo itself...LOL
It was already broken. Hope that rests some minds :-)
|
|
|
|
06/21/2006 12:33:08 AM · #2 |
Pretty funny! I would love to photograph this laptop in the surf.
|
|
|
|
06/21/2006 12:35:51 AM · #3 |
| Yay for your laptop! Hehe :-) |
|
|
|
06/21/2006 12:37:57 AM · #4 |
Originally posted by Zoomdak:
Pretty funny! I would love to photograph this laptop in the surf. |
I couldn't get the model to get in the surf. She was afraid of messing her makeup.
|
|
|
|
06/21/2006 12:38:41 AM · #5 |
Originally posted by fotomann_forever:
It was already broken. Hope that rests some minds :-) |
I was hoping so ... makes a great prop! |
|
|
|
06/21/2006 12:43:10 AM · #6 |
Originally posted by GeneralE:
Originally posted by fotomann_forever:
It was already broken. Hope that rests some minds :-) |
I was hoping so ... makes a great prop! |
Exactly the reason I aquired it. :-)
|
|
|
|
06/21/2006 02:40:50 PM · #7 |
I don't know how to take this comment.
Comment by stonewlall:
Is this a guy?
Can you not see the boobs? Last time I checked boobs were a pretty good indicator of the subject being female. There are exceptions, but ... oh nevermind.
|
|
|
|
06/21/2006 02:47:39 PM · #8 |
Maybe he thought this was a transgender individual with fake boobs!
|
|
|
|
06/21/2006 02:48:23 PM · #9 |
When i voted on this is was pretty sure it was a drag queen too. anyone can pay for boobs, and even some guys have grown them with nothing more than estrogen treatments. but she does look a little rough. i hope shes not a girlfriend or family member of yours because i dont mean to sound rude,but that was my original assumption.
Message edited by author 2006-06-21 14:48:53. |
|
|
|
06/21/2006 02:48:44 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by fotomann_forever:
I don't know how to take this comment.
Comment by stonewlall:
Is this a guy?
Can you not see the boobs? Last time I checked boobs were a pretty good indicator of the subject being female. There are exceptions, but ... oh nevermind. |
Boobs can be added in post processing :P
|
|
|
|
06/21/2006 02:52:01 PM · #11 |
Originally posted by fotomann_forever:
I don't know how to take this comment.
Comment by stonewlall:
Is this a guy?
Can you not see the boobs? Last time I checked boobs were a pretty good indicator of the subject being female. There are exceptions, but ... oh nevermind. |
Originally posted by ShutterPug:
a transgender individual with fake boobs! |
Originally posted by jaded_youth:
a drag queen |
She looks like a woman to me, but people see what they want to see....
|
|
|
|
06/21/2006 02:53:12 PM · #12 |
| Clearly stonewall thought "she" had damaged her hard drive. |
|
|
|
06/21/2006 02:55:40 PM · #13 |
|
|
|
06/21/2006 02:56:07 PM · #14 |
| I think it may also have something to do with the perspective maybe. Her hands look kinda large for a female. Just a thought. |
|
|
|
06/21/2006 03:00:33 PM · #15 |
Originally posted by jaded_youth:
I think it may also have something to do with the perspective maybe. Her hands look kinda large for a female. Just a thought. |
By any account, that's really not her best angle. If it IS a she.... (da da duuuumm!!!) It's a MAAAAN baby!!
|
|
|
|
06/21/2006 03:02:04 PM · #16 |
 
Same model, if anyone wants to do a package check :-)
Really though, basic editing really limited me from softening some marks on her face. The image I submitted for stock and to the model looks much better.
|
|
|
|
06/21/2006 03:15:16 PM · #17 |
"By any account, that's really not her best angle. If it IS a she.... (da da duuuumm!!!) It's a MAAAAN baby!!"
Hahahahaha!!! I thought it was a woman, but now that it's a topic I can see where the 'drag queen' theory might spring from. *shrugs* I am more interested in that laptop.. I have one that recently broke and while too busy bewailing the loss of my lappy, it never occured to me that it could be a photography prop! Hmmmmmm... ^_^ |
|
|
|
06/21/2006 03:24:01 PM · #18 |
Speaking of Comments...
No one seemed to understand the premise of her sultry, annoyed expression. I should have titled this one better, but... Oh well. Let that be a lesson to me. |
|
|
|
06/21/2006 03:46:41 PM · #19 |
Originally posted by _eug:
Speaking of Comments...
No one seemed to understand the premise of her sultry, annoyed expression. I should have titled this one better, but... Oh well. Let that be a lesson to me. |
Left a comment... of what I thought was the "real" issue with the photo.
|
|
|
|
06/21/2006 03:49:51 PM · #20 |
|
|
|
06/21/2006 03:54:59 PM · #21 |
| NN/NI is the new cross-processing! It looks good when applied in moderation (with <-30% opacity) but gets old really fast. |
|
|
|
06/21/2006 04:30:49 PM · #22 |
Originally posted by Uusilehto:
NN/NI is the new cross-processing! It looks good when applied in moderation (with <-30% opacity) but gets old really fast. |
I totally agree.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 11/03/2025 06:49:03 PM EST.
