Author | Thread |
|
05/10/2006 06:29:38 AM · #1 |
Yea, what is it? I didn't really understand the description given by the details. Please Help. |
|
|
05/10/2006 06:31:41 AM · #2 |
best place to start - still life
Message edited by author 2006-05-10 06:32:19. |
|
|
05/10/2006 06:33:01 AM · #3 |
so is it just like plates and dishes and cups? |
|
|
05/10/2006 06:36:42 AM · #4 |
generally a "study" of anything thats inanimate - so no portraits, cats, babies or pretty landscapes |
|
|
05/10/2006 06:52:51 AM · #5 |
Originally posted by ChikaZAWa: so is it just like plates and dishes and cups? |
ROFLMAO - not sure if you were being funny, but your comment just struck me as hilarious. Still laughing (wiping a tear from my eye). |
|
|
05/10/2006 07:16:51 AM · #6 |
Do a search for Still Life on google... you'll see all kinds of paintings and photos of still lifes. |
|
|
05/10/2006 07:57:16 AM · #7 |
Looking at Still Life I, you can see it has to be very still indeed.
This one fell all the way to number 33 because of few Ants :-)
|
|
|
05/10/2006 08:05:40 AM · #8 |
Will the still shot of a moving object work ?
Message edited by author 2006-05-10 08:06:03. |
|
|
05/10/2006 08:08:57 AM · #9 |
Originally posted by dr_timbo: generally a "study" of anything thats inanimate - so no portraits, cats, babies or pretty landscapes |
Pls explain why a landscape does not qualify as still life. |
|
|
05/10/2006 08:31:02 AM · #10 |
because its a landscape... you can use a landscape as a background for your still life.. such as out a window.
Wikipedia has a great description of Still Life, plus go to ARt.com or google still life to see examples of still lifes
Originally posted by sangeeth: Originally posted by dr_timbo: generally a "study" of anything thats inanimate - so no portraits, cats, babies or pretty landscapes |
Pls explain why a landscape does not qualify as still life. |
Message edited by author 2006-05-10 08:37:26. |
|
|
05/10/2006 08:37:23 AM · #11 |
|
|
05/10/2006 08:39:12 AM · #12 |
Originally posted by sangeeth: Originally posted by dr_timbo: generally a "study" of anything thats inanimate - so no portraits, cats, babies or pretty landscapes |
Pls explain why a landscape does not qualify as still life. |
well to put it bluntly because it is a "landscape"... in artistic terms it's like saying why is a cat not a dog? a good landsacpe is about all about dynamic light interplaying with the natural world - a still life is usually static light and an artifical world. |
|
|
05/10/2006 09:02:00 AM · #13 |
Originally posted by dr_timbo: Originally posted by sangeeth: Originally posted by dr_timbo: generally a "study" of anything thats inanimate - so no portraits, cats, babies or pretty landscapes |
Pls explain why a landscape does not qualify as still life. |
well to put it bluntly because it is a "landscape"... in artistic terms it's like saying why is a cat not a dog? a good landsacpe is about all about dynamic light interplaying with the natural world - a still life is usually static light and an artifical world. |
"A still life is a work of art depicting a collection of usually inanimate objects, typically natural -- (flowers, game, sea shells and so on) -- or man-made domestic items -- (drinking glasses, foodstuffs, pipes, books and so on)." from Wikipedia.
So I think Still life is not just artifical world.
But I understand what you tried to convey. Thank you.
Thanks Di for suggesting wikipedia.
|
|
|
05/10/2006 09:07:00 AM · #14 |
Still life, for the purposes of DPC and photography, appears to mean "free study with inanimate objects".
Message edited by author 2006-05-10 09:07:09.
|
|
|
05/10/2006 09:24:39 AM · #15 |
NOW they call for a 'Still Life' challenge! If only I'd waited a few days before thinking of this idea.
The room I shot it in has been decorated now, so I won't be reconstructing this shot :-)
 |
|
|
05/10/2006 09:28:43 AM · #16 |
Heh - when I saw the other thread, that's exactly what I thought, too! How 'bout if I just simply declare that this is an honorary Blue Ribbon shot in Still Life 1.5? It truly is an awesome shot! |
|
|
05/10/2006 12:38:28 PM · #17 |
Originally posted by Melethia: Heh - when I saw the other thread, that's exactly what I thought, too! How 'bout if I just simply declare that this is an honorary Blue Ribbon shot in Still Life 1.5? It truly is an awesome shot! |
I accept! Thanks for the inventing the new catergory for me :-) |
|
|
05/10/2006 05:31:10 PM · #18 |
Originally posted by jimpearce: Originally posted by ChikaZAWa: so is it just like plates and dishes and cups? |
ROFLMAO - not sure if you were being funny, but your comment just struck me as hilarious. Still laughing (wiping a tear from my eye). |
Glad I could give you a laugh from my ignorance ;) But yea I guess I have a better understanding of it now. Thanks to all. I'll probably enter lenscap now. |
|
|
05/10/2006 06:05:37 PM · #19 |
Originally posted by Melethia: Heh - when I saw the other thread, that's exactly what I thought, too! How 'bout if I just simply declare that this is an honorary Blue Ribbon shot in Still Life 1.5? It truly is an awesome shot! |
I agree 100%. I was stunned with this picture. |
|
|
05/10/2006 08:22:35 PM · #20 |
Originally posted by ChikaZAWa: so is it just like plates and dishes and cups? |
..not in my book :)

|
|
|
05/10/2006 08:58:46 PM · #21 |
Originally posted by ltsimring: Originally posted by ChikaZAWa: so is it just like plates and dishes and cups? |
..not in my book :)
|
Thats a lot more interesting... at least to me =D
Any other good examples?
Message edited by author 2006-05-10 20:59:06. |
|
|
05/10/2006 09:10:18 PM · #22 |
Originally posted by ChikaZAWa: Yea, what is it? I didn't really understand the description given by the details. Please Help. |
stock images comes to mind :( |
|
|
05/12/2006 10:00:48 PM · #23 |
I have a quick question. would any of you vote lower on a still life photo that had fire in it? (like a candle or lantern?) since fire does move a bit? just wondering |
|
|
05/12/2006 10:24:31 PM · #24 |
Originally posted by jaded_youth: I have a quick question. would any of you vote lower on a still life photo that had fire in it? (like a candle or lantern?) since fire does move a bit? just wondering |
Google search for still life art featuring fire
I guess it depends on the context. Based on research I wouldn't take off for candles, but if it's the only subject, well, then maybe. :-/
|
|
|
05/13/2006 06:35:29 AM · #25 |
thanks for your reply karmabreeze. anyone else have thoughts about this? |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 07/27/2025 10:22:16 AM EDT.