| Author | Thread | 
		
			|  | 04/21/2006 09:09:26 AM · #26 | 
		| | As long as this camera still works, I'd rather put my money into getting nice glass as opposed to another body. I just got the 10-22 and the 24-70L, but I would still like to complete the setup with the Canon 100mm macro and maybe the 100-400L before considering a new body. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/21/2006 09:13:45 AM · #27 | 
		| | Been doing it annually, much to my wife's dismay.  Each time I use the "this should be the last time I need to do this for awhile" line.  This time, I hope it's true. 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/21/2006 09:30:20 AM · #28 | 
		| | October 1999 - Kodak DC something-or-other, my first digital camera November 2003 - Sony DSC-P32
 May 2004 - Kodak DX-6490
 December 2004 - Canon 300D
 March 2005 - Canon 10D
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/21/2006 09:48:43 AM · #29 | 
		| | #4... 
 Ignoring the film days..
 JamCam date ..i forget
 Fuji 1400Z ...2000 sometime
 Fuji S602z - Dec 03
 Canon 300D - Jan 05 (13 months)
 Canon 30D - April 06 (sooner if it was available) 14 months
 I think I'll sit out the next gen, so might be 24-36 months this time around.
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/21/2006 09:53:41 AM · #30 | 
		|  | 
		
			|  | 04/21/2006 09:54:43 AM · #31 | 
		| | Dec 2002 Powrshot A40 Jul 2004 Eos 300D (1000 Euro)
 Mar 2005 Eos 350D (Sold 300D + 150 Euro)
 Mar 2006 Eos 30D  (Sold 350D + 550 Euro)
 
 TCO 1700 Euro, about the same price as a 10D in 2004
 I don't think I will upgrade within 24 months now.
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/21/2006 09:55:58 AM · #32 | 
		| | Film SLR for 15 years and counting, dSLR for almost 1 year and counting [I have had 1 P&S digital since 01-ish] :-) 
 I know the digital bodies will likely have a reduced life due to the speed of the upgrade cycles - not that I would upgrade for no reason but eventually (no doubt before 15 years) there will be a big gap in functionality or something specific that I really want and I will upgrade.
 
 Funny thing is that the dSLR is similar in quantative terms as my old film SLR (number of frames, modes e.t.c.) - qualitative they are not in the same league because the newer one is sooooo much better at auto-focus e.t.c.
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/21/2006 03:48:54 PM · #33 | 
		| | ...ah, well... some people do have it rough :)  We all have our cross we must bare :)
 
 
 | Originally posted by hopper: YOU SEEIN' THIS PROZAC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
 
 | Originally posted by dahkota: For me, it was a lot less before I got married - now I get bodies or lenses as birthday and anniversary gifts. :)
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/21/2006 04:00:15 PM · #34 | 
		| | i've been able to get 3 bodies and 4 lens in the past three years, the last was the D200 and the 24-120mm. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/21/2006 04:05:26 PM · #35 | 
		| | | Originally posted by prozac: ...ah, well... some people do have it rough :)  We all have our cross we must bare
 :)
 
 | 
 Uh, baring a cross (or most anything else) might violate the site TOS (Terms of Spelling) ... : )
 | 
 | 
			Home -
			
Challenges -
			
Community -
			
League -
			
Photos -
			
Cameras -
			
Lenses -
			
Learn -
			
			
Help -
			
Terms of Use -
			
Privacy -
			
Top ^
		DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
		
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
		
Current Server Time: 10/31/2025 11:58:38 AM EDT.