| Author | Thread |
|
|
10/23/2005 03:40:28 PM · #251 |
Originally posted by nshapiro:
Ok, I know lots have done it, but I am now wondering: Is adding grain in the shot via post processing still legal in advanced editing? Isn't that considered rendering pixels? |
I don't think it's illegal but I think it would be much more creative to do it without the grain filter.
|
|
|
|
10/23/2005 03:40:40 PM · #252 |
Originally posted by nshapiro:
Ok, I know lots have done it, but I am now wondering: Is adding grain in the shot via post processing still legal in advanced editing? Isn't that considered rendering pixels? |
Adding noise is listed as being acceptable for basic editing (see details of basic editing) , so it must be for Advanced as well |
|
|
|
10/23/2005 03:41:29 PM · #253 |
Originally posted by nshapiro:
Ok, I know lots have done it, but I am now wondering: Is adding grain in the shot via post processing still legal in advanced editing? Isn't that considered rendering pixels? |
Adding noise is legal in both rulesets.
Robt.
|
|
|
|
10/23/2005 03:43:17 PM · #254 |
Originally posted by orussell:
Originally posted by nshapiro:
Ok, I know lots have done it, but I am now wondering: Is adding grain in the shot via post processing still legal in advanced editing? Isn't that considered rendering pixels? |
I don't think it's illegal but I think it would be much more creative to do it without the grain filter. |
That's virtually impossible for normal subjects with a 20D. Even at its noisiest, a full-frame image reduced to 640 pixels shows virtually no noise. The only way to do it would be to crop like crazy...
R.
|
|
|
|
10/23/2005 03:53:55 PM · #255 |
I realy wanted to enter this one, perhaps with a little more work, but I'm becoming extremely sensitive to people complaining they recognize my subjects, so I'm posting it here instead and outing myself so I won't be tempted at the last minute :-( How does it look to y'all?
Robt.
|
|
|
|
10/23/2005 03:55:40 PM · #256 |
|
|
|
10/23/2005 03:56:40 PM · #257 |
Oh, just commented on the image itself. To be honest, I had no idea it was yours. When I click on a thumbnail to comment, I don't look at the name until AFTERWARD.
NOBODY will guess MY grain. bwa ha ha ha ha ha.
|
|
|
|
10/23/2005 04:18:48 PM · #258 |
Originally posted by bear_music:
I realy wanted to enter this one, perhaps with a little more work, but I'm becoming extremely sensitive to people complaining they recognize my subjects, so I'm posting it here instead and outing myself so I won't be tempted at the last minute :-( How does it look to y'all?
Robt. |
Looks very Joeyesque.
|
|
|
|
10/23/2005 04:30:42 PM · #259 |
I hope we see some color shots in this challenge. It seems to me converting to sepia or B/W then adding noise will be the norm for this challenge.
|
|
|
|
10/23/2005 04:34:14 PM · #260 |
Naturally I took this a day too early. I think it's grainy and it's in color...but it would probably be another 5.1 anyway. :(
|
|
|
|
10/23/2005 05:00:28 PM · #261 |
Originally posted by bear_music:
I realy wanted to enter this one, perhaps with a little more work, but I'm becoming extremely sensitive to people complaining they recognize my subjects, so I'm posting it here instead and outing myself so I won't be tempted at the last minute :-( How does it look to y'all?
Robt. |
Don't let em get to you Robt!!!! If you don't enter the challenges it means you're letting 'them' win, and more importantly ...taking a creative and always interesting (often out of the box) shot out of the challenge arena!
|
|
|
|
10/23/2005 05:13:04 PM · #262 |
I agree about the color shots. If we could just clone Joey Lawrence. hee hee
|
|
|
|
10/23/2005 05:48:31 PM · #263 |
I was just playing around with grain on this one. I think it went ok, first time playing with grain really.
Yeah, hopefully there will be some color grain. |
|
|
|
10/23/2005 05:52:11 PM · #264 |
Originally posted by bear_music:
Robt. |
bear_music, you goober! :) I wouldn't have known this was you at all. Unless you have the skiff hidden in there somewhere and I missed it? LOL
|
|
|
|
10/23/2005 11:24:12 PM · #265 |
Originally posted by LadeeM:
Originally posted by bear_music:
Robt. |
bear_music, you goober! :) I wouldn't have known this was you at all. Unless you have the skiff hidden in there somewhere and I missed it? LOL |
Take a look at my profile, challenge entries :-) Ring a bell? jejeje�
Not to fear, people, it's not that I'm not entering; I'm just not entering this shot. And oh, yeah, mine's a color entry.
R.
Message edited by author 2005-10-23 23:24:59.
|
|
|
|
10/24/2005 12:18:33 AM · #266 |
And now that the challenge is in voting stage, I think that 80% of the photo's just have added grain. No message with the grain.
|
|
|
|
10/24/2005 02:03:31 AM · #267 |
Originally posted by Philos31:
And now that the challenge is in voting stage, I think that 80% of the photo's just have added grain. No message with the grain. |
Mine, which is not entered, has no added grain. |
|
|
|
10/24/2005 02:10:57 AM · #268 |
| unfortunately, with such a small size of image, the most noisy picture that I produced was still not grainy enough to have it seen natively. so I added grain, so what? the challenge was to use grain as a tool to add to the feel of the photograph. As long as that function is performed, why does anyone care how it was achieved? |
|
|
|
10/24/2005 11:01:29 AM · #269 |
or
Not sure I went with the right shot for the challenge, these were two outtakes...I have a third, but it is too close to my entry to post. Which of these two are better? |
|
|
|
10/24/2005 11:26:11 AM · #270 |
Originally posted by Sherri1209:
Not sure I went with the right shot for the challenge, these were two outtakes...I have a third, but it is too close to my entry to post. Which of these two are better? |
They're both interesting, but I also think they are too "busy" for the grain to have any impact. The grain isn't adding anything to the "message". JMO.
|
|
|
|
10/24/2005 06:52:58 PM · #271 |
Originally posted by bear_music:
Take a look at my profile, challenge entries :-) Ring a bell? jejeje�
R. |
OK ... the church ... I got'cha now! :)
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 11/04/2025 03:54:35 AM EST.
