DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register) 
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Current Challenge >> Predictions for "Four" Challenge
Pages:  
Showing posts 26 - 43 of 43, (reverse)
AuthorThread
 12/19/2002 08:00:51 AM · #26
this is true in many asian countries.

8 is lucky. 4 is half of 8 and considered VERY unlucky.

Originally posted by lisae:
Wow, I just found out that in Japan the number four is pronounced the same way as the word "death". This means they have a really strong superstition about 4. Nothing comes in sets of 4, and room numbers with 4 in them are skipped in hotels and hospitals!

I hope we don't have many Japanese users :).
 12/19/2002 08:01:22 AM · #27
I thought I might combine BOTH challenges and do a FOUR-skin.

:)


Originally posted by kendall:
Originally posted by Gordon:
an uncircumcised penis
A wayward golf shot
A close up of someone's head
oh. Four ? not fore.... hmmm.


Dmn it gordon ! ...you killed my foreskin idea. Back to the drawing table
 12/19/2002 09:03:33 AM · #28
Hey if i was a newbie, i'd welcome anything i could read that told me what to avoid : ) ...

But I'm probably just over analyzing this.

Message edited by author 2002-12-20 18:24:03.
 12/20/2002 05:49:30 PM · #29
how about a 4-wheel drive vehicle
 12/20/2002 07:35:52 PM · #30
In Japan, the word for four is "Shi" and this mean death. So many hospitals and hotels don't have fouth floors or room numbers with the number four in them. A student told me the other day, he works for NTT Docomo, a phone company, that all the staff get the mobile phone numbers using 4 in them, cause no one else wants them! One of the company benefits!!
 12/20/2002 07:38:47 PM · #31
Whoops! Sorry, I didn't scroll down to Lisaes' post until after I wrote mine and realised I said exactly the same thing!
12/21/2002 10:04:59 AM · #32
Finally submitted mine. It took more than 500 exposures over 2 day's, but I've got one. :-)
Imagine doing that with film............

I hope next week's challenge is something like:
"Take your best shot of your Christmass Dinner's plate." While I go upstairs post processing, someone else can do the dishes. :-)

12/22/2002 01:29:24 AM · #33
Most any of the regulars would agree that photos of children are frowned upon? Really?
Funny that I haven't been told that. I think that people often shoot what they have handy. I just happen to have some beautiful children in the family so they end up in a lot of my photos. As long as it fits the challenge, what's so bad about that? Ten years from now, I can guarantee you that I would rather have a cute photo of my niece than a great photo of a keyboard or an apple.
 12/22/2002 01:49:40 AM · #34
Originally posted by indigo997:
Most any of the regulars would agree that photos of children are frowned upon? Really?
Funny that I haven't been told that. I think that people often shoot what they have handy. I just happen to have some beautiful children in the family so they end up in a lot of my photos. As long as it fits the challenge, what's so bad about that? Ten years from now, I can guarantee you that I would rather have a cute photo of my niece than a great photo of a keyboard or an apple.

Here, here! (pun intended)
 12/22/2002 12:31:09 PM · #35
Originally posted by indigo997:
Ten years from now, I can guarantee you that I would rather have a cute photo of my niece than a great photo of a keyboard or an apple.


No doubt. Although I still believe that most of the regulars vote photos with children/pets in them less favorably, with few exceptions of course.

Message edited by author 2002-12-22 12:38:15.
 12/22/2002 12:51:09 PM · #36
for all the nude lovers out there...
don't forget four-nication
 12/22/2002 01:26:27 PM · #37
Originally posted by smellyfish1002:
for all the nude lovers out there...
don't forget four-nication

...with or without four-play?

Message edited by author 2002-12-22 13:27:31.
 12/22/2002 01:56:39 PM · #38
I agree that there might be some predictable images, but who cares it's the DPchallenge not the DP Original not the obvious please challenge. I encourage all to take a shot of the #4 on a key pad. Best executed shot wins. That would be even more challenging, true?
 12/22/2002 02:04:20 PM · #39
Originally posted by bamaster:
Originally posted by indigo997:
Ten years from now, I can guarantee you that I would rather have a cute photo of my niece than a great photo of a keyboard or an apple.


No doubt. Although I still believe that most of the regulars vote photos with children/pets in them less favorably, with few exceptions of course.


But which would you rather have, a high score of a photo with a one week interest "life span" or a low scored photo you will treasure for life?
 12/22/2002 02:28:57 PM · #40
Originally posted by myqyl:
Originally posted by bamaster:
Originally posted by indigo997:
Ten years from now, I can guarantee you that I would rather have a cute photo of my niece than a great photo of a keyboard or an apple.


No doubt. Although I still believe that most of the regulars vote photos with children/pets in them less favorably, with few exceptions of course.


But which would you rather have, a high score of a photo with a one week interest "life span" or a low scored photo you will treasure for life?


No doubt. Although I still believe that most of the regulars vote photos with children/pets in them less favorably, with few exceptions of course.
 12/22/2002 02:40:24 PM · #41
Let me go ahead and post the next person's response since I've managed to turn everyone against me.


Yeah, but my children are beautiful and I don't care whether anyone votes my photos high or not. My love for my children is always a percect 10.


I agree with Fibre Optix... let's have a challenge of the boring and obvious. Where 'creative execution' will be the only way to seperate yourself from the noise.

Ooo! Gotta go. My Degiorno's pizza is ready!
12/22/2002 03:18:51 PM · #42
I've never submitted a photo here -- with or without my kid -- which I'd give a 10. So what?

How is saying "I give a lower vote to photos with kids in them" any different than giving a lower vote to photos with people of color in them, or women, or Jews, or dogs, or snapdragons, or any other group or class identified by some in a negative light (pun intended)?

I try to look past my own prejudices and biases, for example against guns and violence, and to evaluate whether the artist effectively conveyed their message, even if it's a message with which I disagree. And I can appreciate the esthetics of arms and armor, while still desiring them all to be relegated to museums as antiquities.

I have no problem with people admitting their own biases, only with exalting them rather than confronting and overcoming them.
 12/22/2002 05:38:05 PM · #43
I finally settled on my submission, and I'm VERY happy with it. Plus, I haven't seen the subject mentioned anywhere in this thread! ;)

On the topic of originality, I really dont care how "original" a photo is. While I always like creativity, I'll give any photo a good score, as long as it's well composed, well lit, and has proper focus, and good use of color (or lack of).

I wanted to add: I wonder how many pictures we'll see that are plays on the word "four" or "fore", that have nothing to do with the actual number. I predict, more than one :)



Message edited by author 2002-12-22 18:08:39.
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 08/24/2025 09:08:21 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/24/2025 09:08:21 AM EDT.