Author | Thread |
|
07/21/2005 05:20:53 PM · #1 |
It's here! At last! Just took some shots of my faithful old Methodist church. I'll get them up this evening; off to read the manual right now LOL.
It feels so nice in my hands, sigh...
Robt.
|
|
|
07/21/2005 05:21:54 PM · #2 |
way to go!
may the ribbon collecting begin
|
|
|
07/21/2005 05:23:22 PM · #3 |
Awesome! That should keep you busy for quite some time. Let me know how the learning curve is on that thing...been thinking about going to that for my upgrade. |
|
|
07/21/2005 05:23:29 PM · #4 |
And may you sooner change your profile to 20D! ;-)
Way to go, can't wait to see your work!
|
|
|
07/21/2005 05:29:03 PM · #5 |
Originally posted by 2Shay: And may you sooner change your profile to 20D! ;-)
Way to go, can't wait to see your work! |
Done :-)
Robt.
|
|
|
07/21/2005 05:29:04 PM · #6 |
Whoohoo!
Can I drool on it? :D |
|
|
07/21/2005 05:30:48 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by bear_music:
It feels so nice in my hands, sigh... |
The camera - Right??
 |
|
|
07/21/2005 05:32:27 PM · #8 |
Originally posted by BradP:
Originally posted by bear_music:
It feels so nice in my hands, sigh... |
The camera - Right??
|
kinkeeh... |
|
|
07/21/2005 07:29:37 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by BradP:
Originally posted by bear_music:
It feels so nice in my hands, sigh... |
The camera - Right??
|
No, the "manual"...
Offloading first pics now.
R.
|
|
|
07/21/2005 07:33:33 PM · #10 |
Cool Robert! You're really gonna have some fun. Isn't that thing lightning fast compared to the 300D? Or 10d :-P
|
|
|
07/21/2005 07:34:20 PM · #11 |
Originally posted by pidge: Whoohoo!
Can I drool on it? :D |
The camera, right?
:)like Brad said(:
Congrats bear! |
|
|
07/21/2005 07:38:31 PM · #12 |
I'm just lookin' at them in the viewing utility and zooming in and in and in and IN and there's no end to it. NOTICEABLY crisper than the 300D even at the same image parameters...
more to come.
R.
|
|
|
07/21/2005 07:38:48 PM · #13 |
Yahoo! Can't wait to see your first work. I guess we are all in for less ribbons now. |
|
|
07/21/2005 07:49:18 PM · #14 |
Wooo hooo! Congrats! I know how you feel! Always fun getting new toys! :) |
|
|
07/21/2005 07:59:12 PM · #15 |
Basically straight from camera with some USM dumped in (no in-cam-sharpening) and a little cropping out of the narrow format:
Gotta feed people, back in a hour.
R.
|
|
|
07/21/2005 08:06:32 PM · #16 |
welcome to the BADASS club |
|
|
07/21/2005 08:19:43 PM · #17 |
Awesom shots. it's official now, I gotta get a DSLR.
|
|
|
07/21/2005 09:18:37 PM · #18 |
And one more: no WAY I could get this shot without the 10-22 at 10mm. Freaking awesome foreground plus squared verticals...
Robt.
|
|
|
07/21/2005 11:21:23 PM · #19 |
Hey I'm more jealous of your 10-22 than the 20d :) I'm glad you included "at 10mm" in your text above so one can see for themselves the lack of distortion that thing has wide open. Don't you agree that 'actual focal length used' would be a useful bit of info to include below 'lens' in the Photograph Information box? I made that suggestion in the forums a few weeks ago for just such a case but it went nowhere... maybe the weight of your endorsement would get it done (that is, if you agree of course).
(edit: forgot how to spell endorsement:)
Message edited by author 2005-07-21 23:22:53. |
|
|
07/21/2005 11:30:08 PM · #20 |
Originally posted by bear_music: And one more: no WAY I could get this shot without the 10-22 at 10mm. Freaking awesome foreground plus squared verticals...
Robt. |
on the 20D body its like a 16mm lens on a fullframe body
still super wide
|
|
|
07/22/2005 12:11:00 AM · #21 |
Originally posted by Fetor: Originally posted by bear_music: And one more: no WAY I could get this shot without the 10-22 at 10mm. Freaking awesome foreground plus squared verticals...
Robt. |
on the 20D body its like a 16mm lens on a fullframe body
still super wide |
Yeah, an "actual" 10mm would be extreme even for me... Here's a grabshot (ISO 800 with the Nikon 5700) of the 10-22 mounted. Cool looking...
And, 4N4M, why would you be jealous of my 20D since you already hAVE one? LOL.
R.
|
|
|
07/22/2005 12:28:47 AM · #22 |
So now that you've got it...would you be up to taking some 1600/3200 ISO shots and posting those straight out of the camera? I'd love to see them, and you'd have to test it out sooner or later! :)
|
|
|
07/22/2005 12:30:13 AM · #23 |
Sure. Actual low-light shots, daylight high speed, or both?
Robt.
|
|
|
07/22/2005 12:36:13 AM · #24 |
I'd love to see some high ISO low-light shots, but some high-ISO daylight ones would be cool as well. I'm thinking about upgrading sometime in the next year, and 20D is the current choice (depending on whether or not anything is realeased in the meantime) and being able to actually use the higher ISO's is a large part of that consideration.
|
|
|
07/22/2005 01:21:34 AM · #25 |
Originally posted by bfox2: I'd love to see some high ISO low-light shots, but some high-ISO daylight ones would be cool as well. I'm thinking about upgrading sometime in the next year, and 20D is the current choice (depending on whether or not anything is realeased in the meantime) and being able to actually use the higher ISO's is a large part of that consideration. |
Tamron 17-35mm 2.8-4 on 20D, Handheld, 1/60sec f/4 ISO-1600, about two feet from glass, only light in room was aquarium lighting and incidental light from doorway to outside (Birch aquarium San Diego)
Will add 100% crop in a few...
Andy |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/17/2025 06:33:12 PM EDT.