| Author | Thread | 
		
			|  | 06/06/2005 01:51:35 PM · #1 | 
		| | Anyone have any comments on what is the best all around zoom for the Canon 20D? or walk around lens?
 
 Doesn't have to be Canon just to fit a canon. Doesn't have to be zoom.
 Please say why you like it so much.
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 06/06/2005 01:55:09 PM · #2 | 
		| | Well that´s always a matter of opinion but if you want mine it´s the 24-70L. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 06/06/2005 01:59:24 PM · #3 | 
		| | When I used my D Rebel it was the 16-35 f/2.8, now with the 1D II it is the 24-70.  Depends on your shooting style.  I like wider angles. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 06/06/2005 02:02:13 PM · #4 | 
		| | I like the 17-40 f/4, because it zooms out to the 35mm equivalent of 27mm for a 1.6 crop factor camera.  I like the wide stuff, so the 24-70L wouldn't be wide enough for me on a 20D. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 06/06/2005 02:16:15 PM · #5 | 
		| | I'm in the same boat... looking for a good buy with backpay money. 
 So what's up with getting rid of the Canon 17-40mm f/4?  Don't like it?
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 06/06/2005 02:17:26 PM · #6 | 
		| | I do like the wide angle but would like some reach too. I would sacrafic both for sharpness. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 06/06/2005 02:18:48 PM · #7 | 
		| | Tamron 28-75 XR Di f/2.8... it's extremely sharp throughout the zoom range, works well in low light, and it's a third the price of the Canon 24-70. Unless I have a specific need for wide angle or a long zoom, this is the  lens that's on my camera. For greater range, the Canon 17-85 IS would be a good choice. 
 Message edited by author 2005-06-06 14:26:47.
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 06/06/2005 02:20:49 PM · #8 | 
		| | Not the sharpest lens, but very functional and handy, Canon 28-135 IS. 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 06/06/2005 02:21:33 PM · #9 | 
		| | I wouldn`t be without my sigma 18-125mm lens.. It can`t be beaten for a walkaround lens and sharper than the kit lens. 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 06/06/2005 02:21:39 PM · #10 | 
		| | For a walkaround lens I used to say the 17-40mm F/4L, but I recently bought a 24-70mm F/2.8L and I am just amazed at the sharpness and overall quality of the lens. If I know I need to have the wide angle the 17-40mm is still my choice (I'm definitely not selling that lens) but for just generally walking around I have a feeling I will be using the 24-70mm more. It's just that much fun to use. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 06/06/2005 02:22:16 PM · #11 | 
		| | | Originally posted by Corwyn: I do like the wide angle but would like some reach too. I would sacrafic both for sharpness.
 | 
 
 So you're saying that your canon 17-40mm isn't sharp?  That sux.
 
 I'm good for reach right now.  The Canon 300mm f/4 L IS is my favourite lens at the moment.  Will be purchasing Canon 1.4x converter to go with it shortly.
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 06/06/2005 02:22:18 PM · #12 | 
		| | I can justify having this lens. I've owned it now for 4 months and used it maybe 6 times. That 1000$ canadian dollars sitting in waste. I do you my 28-135 a little more but would like something a little wider. 
 
 | Originally posted by Beagleboy: I'm in the same boat... looking for a good buy with backpay money.
 
 So what's up with getting rid of the Canon 17-40mm f/4?  Don't like it?
 | 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 06/06/2005 02:22:54 PM · #13 | 
		| | The 17-40 is supersharp but no lenght. 
 
 | Originally posted by Beagleboy: 
 | Originally posted by Corwyn: I do like the wide angle but would like some reach too. I would sacrafic both for sharpness.
 | 
 
 So you're saying that your canon 17-40mm isn't sharp?  That sux.
 
 I'm good for reach right now.  The Canon 300mm f/4 L IS is my favourite lens at the moment.  Will be purchasing Canon 1.4x converter to go with it shortly.
 | 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 06/06/2005 02:30:12 PM · #14 | 
		| | without owning one... I think the best all around lens for me would be the 70-200L 2.8 IS.  But it might be a too short some of the time. 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 06/06/2005 02:34:28 PM · #15 | 
		| | the 17-40L is very good, but not the best walkaround lens since it's just wideangle, the 28-135 isn't the best either since it's 45-216 on 1.6 crop. 
 the Tamron 28-75 f2.8 is great, but I think the new Canon EF-S 17-85 IS is the best walkaround today, on 1.6crop it has the same angle as the 28-135 IS but the optics are much better.
 
 as for the 24-70L, it's great, but it is way to heavy for a walkaround, and it costs an arm & a leg ;)
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 06/06/2005 02:39:00 PM · #16 | 
		| | | Originally posted by kyebosh: without owning one... I think the best all around lens for me would be the 70-200L 2.8 IS.  But it might be a too short some of the time.
 | 
 
 I have the 70-200L f2.8 IS, and as a walkaround.. well it's so heavy that your neck starts to hurt after 20 minutes, due to the weight of the camera+lens. (using the neckstrap)
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 06/06/2005 02:39:05 PM · #17 | 
		| | That's a very good point; the 24-70 does indeed weigh a ton. And I am sure it just gets magnified after carrying it all day. Something to consider. | 
 | 
		
			|  | 06/06/2005 02:39:21 PM · #18 | 
		| | Without any HOPE of owning one... I think the best all around lens would be the Canon 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6L. ;-D | 
 | 
		
			|  | 06/06/2005 02:41:23 PM · #19 | 
		| | Now there is some weight to lug around :-) | 
 | 
		
			|  | 06/06/2005 02:41:31 PM · #20 | 
		| | What about the 17-85mm IS. 
 Anyone own one???
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 06/06/2005 02:43:53 PM · #21 | 
		| | Now this isn't a zoom, but it has to be the best to carry around with you for walk around shooting :) 
 
  | 
 | 
		
			|  | 06/06/2005 02:48:15 PM · #22 | 
		| | | Originally posted by DanSig: 
 | Originally posted by kyebosh: without owning one... I think the best all around lens for me would be the 70-200L 2.8 IS.  But it might be a too short some of the time.
 | 
 
 I have the 70-200L f2.8 IS, and as a walkaround.. well it's so heavy that your neck starts to hurt after 20 minutes, due to the weight of the camera+lens. (using the neckstrap)
 | 
 I have the 80-200L which weighs similarly to that one.  I don't find it too heavy at all to walk around with.
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 06/06/2005 03:43:57 PM · #23 | 
		| | Besides the kit lens, I have the 24-70 L, and the 70-200 2.8 L IS. The 17-40 is in the mail as well. Up till now, the 24-70 is my no doubt favorite for a walk around lens. While it is heavy, it's not near as bad as the 70-200, and for what I shoot, more versatile. Note that I do not carry my camera on a neck strap, but with the wrist strap, and after a day of wandering around, I really don't feel it that much. At any rate, not enough to trade in for something less. Good luck. 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 06/06/2005 05:07:02 PM · #24 | 
		| | | Originally posted by bruski: Now this isn't a zoom, but it has to be the best to carry around with you for walk around shooting :)
 
 
   | 
 
 I agree, cause you don't have to get as close to your subject.....less walking!  :-)
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 06/06/2005 06:13:28 PM · #25 | 
		| | You have 12 suggestions so far.  Are you any closer to your final decision? 
 | 
 | 
			Home -
			
Challenges -
			
Community -
			
League -
			
Photos -
			
Cameras -
			
Lenses -
			
Learn -
			
			
Help -
			
Terms of Use -
			
Privacy -
			
Top ^
		DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
		
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
		
Current Server Time: 10/31/2025 02:34:17 AM EDT.