| Author | Thread |
|
|
01/31/2005 11:23:11 AM · #1 |
Anyone own or used this lens: Canon 35-350 F3.5L?
I had decided on the 70-200 F2.8L but the above lens looks a bit more versatile (except for the Fstop of course..). How much of a difference does F3.5 make compared to F2.8?
Thanks, Lori
Message edited by author 2005-01-31 11:23:59. |
|
|
|
01/31/2005 11:26:27 AM · #2 |
2/3 stop. It's still f/5.6 on the long end so it would not be great for much indoor or lower light stuff at all.
Message edited by author 2005-01-31 11:28:04.
|
|
|
|
01/31/2005 11:29:56 AM · #3 |
Think missjune has one.
You could also look at reviews at Fredmiranda.com and other review sites. |
|
|
|
01/31/2005 11:35:43 AM · #4 |
Originally posted by jmsetzler:
2/3 stop. It's still f/5.6 on the long end so it would not be great for much indoor or lower light stuff at all. |
Yea, that's the part I was wondering about: what it'd be at the long end. Thanks John :-) |
|
|
|
01/31/2005 11:49:55 AM · #5 |
The 70-200 is a sharper, higher contrast lens.
Here is a link to the specs for both lenses.
//cweb.canon.jp/camera/ef/catalog/category/tele_zoom.html
The MTF looks much better for the 70-200. |
|
|
|
01/31/2005 09:07:50 PM · #6 |
The 35-350, because of the wider zoom range and smaller aperture, will hunt more then the 70-200 while aquiring a focus point. This effect will be exagerated in low light.
|
|
|
|
01/31/2005 09:13:08 PM · #7 |
i'm not positive, but i think that lens also is a push pull design and i've read that a lot people don't like them ...
... but maybe not, just adding what i think i know |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/14/2025 02:09:33 PM EDT.
