Mercury's Ride
by TomsPhotos

Comment:
Appears very Snot-shotish to me. This car on the road with a blurred background could have been good. Having the background it currently does adds distraction to the image, as the background is too in focus. The building adds little to the photo or the story, so shooting with the clear space would have been much better

Holden V8 Commodore ss
by BrianR

Comment:
Ahhh, the Commodore SS.......
Not really sure about this. The bright car looks good, reasonable lighting on it, and the paint really does stand out. The whale looks completely fake, especially the way it is lit compared to the rest of the scene, and then the background is univiting, with the wind going, like there is a storm on he way. It seems like 3 scenes stitched together, with none of them really connecting, or shot in front of a blue screen..........

Limousine
by Titia

Comment:
Appears to be a photo of opportunit, rather than planned. The heads on the other side of the car......
For this shot, beiong more in front so that it looked as if he was waving you (the viewer) to the car would have worked quite well. At this angle, it looks as if we are just observing the scene. with that phrase, we needed to see the happy couple, as at the moment, it doesn't refer to an element in the photo

VERSA-tility
by PennyStreet

Comment:
There are a lot of distracting elements in this photo. The taxi behind, the lights behind, and especially the reflection of the lights in the bodywork all interfer with the photo. Cropping off the rear bumper is also an issue, and overall the crop is too tight around the car.

Trust Me
by rrdjserv

Comment:
A different idea, but one that I am not sure has been executed as well as it could have been. I think by a different angle and more mud, you could have emphasised the contrast between the words and the car. At the moment, the crop on the car is awkward, cutting through elements of it and making it look incomplete.

Stand Out!
by witt34

Comment:
The roadside elements, the large white and blue box etc are distracting elements that draw attention. I am not a fan of the writing, as it is hard to read, and goes against the standard left to right. Reflections of the tree on the car is also an element that would have been best avoided.

time for a new one
by goodnews

Comment:
The composition of this photo doesn't really work for me. I am struggling to see what the main subject is. The car with its hood up makes a large, black area. The people are all looking away, and in most cases, have their back to the camera. The crop includes plenty of road, but is tight at the top. The overall composition seems a little rushed, and more opportunistic than planned.

Looks good even Parked
by jaysonmc

Comment:
I can barely see the car. It is way too dark under there to be able to see any detail, and therefore it is not the subject. Even the car parked out in front of the apartment, where at least it was reasonably lit, would have made this a stronger image

1957 Chevy Bel Air
by choltmeier

Comment:
The car in this looks fake, and not like a photo. Maybe it is the softness of the image, or the way the light is, but to me it looks like a poster and not a photograph.
I am not a fan of the light reflecting strongly off the windshield. It draws attention and gives the photo an overexposed feel.
Overall ad composition is good, however the image in this case lets it down.

No Barriers
by androgeus

Comment:
I find the crop of this image to be awkward. The back of the car, adn its rook have been cropped out. We don't get to see many of the features of the car. In many ways, the car is a secondary element in this photo, while the sunset is the primary element. However, in a Car Ad, we are tyring to sell the car, and while sunsets are great, the car should always be the primary element of the photo that draws attention. Everything else should just be supporting the aim of selling that car.