|
Image |
Comment |
| 01/21/2003 10:07:34 PM | Winter Treesby jab119Comment: Critique Club Critique
(1) COMPOSITION (CONTENT) â From your title, your subject was the bare trees of winter. The photo shows that. You had three sight lines to choose from â viewed from the left tree line, from the center, and from the right side. I hope you took all three. Iâve tried similar shots, and found that an off angle sometimes looks better. I find that the centered view is the best when there is a subject or target at the point of convergence. I donât see it here. But this center line works ok â and you have everything well centered. I also like how you got close to the ground for the shot.
(2) BACKGROUND - I like how you chose a fair amount of negative space at the top. It works very well.
(3) CAMERA WORK ,TECHNICAL â The near trees are in good focus. The far ones are a tad blurred. Iâd recommend a smaller aperture, say f/11, and a tripod.
(4) DIGITAL PROCESSING ,TECHNICAL â The only minor change I see would be to crop out the small white paper centered in the foreground. I question whether this would have worked better in B&W. The green grass is ânot winterâ with the leaves down.
(5) MY OPINION ON THE PHOTO â A good photo which could have been improved (I think) with a different choice of shot angle.
Jim msp
|
| 01/21/2003 09:45:00 PM | As The River Turnsby spillerComment: Critique Club Critique
(1) COMPOSITION (CONTENT) - Overall, I like the composition of the shot. From the title, your subject of interest was the curve in the river. Good choice. It is nicely located off center to the right, where the flowing water leads me. I also like the line of the far wall, sloped down and to the right, drawing the eye to the bend. Personally, I like the rocks in the foreground; I disagree with those that did not. They add another element to the river, and they add texture.
(2) BACKGROUND â Generally good. The use of a polarizer might have added to the sky â made it more blue.
(3) CAMERA WORK ,TECHNICAL â Looks good. You would have gotten a sharper picture with a smaller aperture (f/16?) and a tripod.
(4) DIGITAL PROCESSING ,TECHNICAL â No recommended changes.
(5) MY OPINION ON THE PHOTO â The main item in question, in my opinion, is the time of day you took this. I liked the contrasting sunlight and shadows. However, your main subject, the river bend, is in the shadows. If you had reversed the time of day (i.e., am instead of pm) and gotten the bend in the light, you would have greatly improved this. I wouldnât like to see it taken at noon; the shadows work well. They are just reversed.
BTW, with the light & dark, and good textures, did you try converting this to B&W? I think it would be a good one.
Jim msp
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/16/2003 11:02:31 PM | Two Tribesby albright1Comment: Critique Club Critique
(1) COMPOSITION (CONTENT) â When I first look at this photo, my eye goes to the centered camel. Then it moves up to the background, moves right to the camel master (?), and finally to the left to the visiting couple. The people on the sides balance this out well. If I could have placed the young lady, Iâd like to see her closer to the center & the camel. I like the variation in color here.
(2) BACKGROUND â Good. A bright sky, but thatâs the way it is.
(3) CAMERA WORK ,TECHNICAL â Very good. Girlâs pink sweater is a tad bright from the low sun.
(4) DIGITAL PROCESSING ,TECHNICAL â No recommended changes.
(5) MY OPINION ON THE PHOTO â A great photo, and technically meets the challenge well, as the couple are âin a strange landâ for them. But they are not really the main subject here. That doesnât detract from the quality of the photo, but it might have affected the way some saw it as precisely meeting the challenge. (Iâm guessing here, how else to explain the 5âs?)
Jim msp
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/16/2003 10:38:13 PM | Lonely Ol' Night by John Cougarby spillerComment: Critique Club Critique
(1) COMPOSITION (CONTENT) â Very good composition. I like the way the trees frame the scene. The curve of the road is nice, adding to effect of drawing me into the photo and heading for the sunset.
(2) BACKGROUND â Very good. While you may have taken the shots, I would like to see a slightly darker sky for comparison. It might bring out the feeling of loneliness a little more.
(3) CAMERA WORK ,TECHNICAL â Very good. I see no recommended changes. Good choice on the portrait format.
(4) DIGITAL PROCESSING ,TECHNICAL - Very good. I see no recommended changes.
(5) MY OPINION ON THE PHOTO â Quite good. As I said above though, my first reaction to it is that the sky is a tad too light for the mood you want to convey. Still, a very good photo.
Jim msp
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/16/2003 10:22:44 PM | Flight of the bumblebeeby dadas115Comment: Critique Club Critique
(1) COMPOSITION (CONTENT) â Excellent. The bee is perfectly positioned, with âemptyâ space to fly to.
(2) BACKGROUND â Great; perfect use of short DOF.
(3) CAMERA WORK ,TECHNICAL â Excellent. I donât know how you set this up, but Iâm impressed. If I were to nit-pick, Iâd pick on the reflections on the body. But I donât necessarily know how to change this for a live shot of a bee flying.
(4) DIGITAL PROCESSING ,TECHNICAL â No recommended changes.
(5) MY OPINION ON THE PHOTO â One of the best live flying bee shots Iâve seen. You should feel really good about this one.
Jim msp
|
| 01/16/2003 10:08:36 PM | Eggs, Catapillar, Cacoon, Butterfly...Repeat.by JDMTComment: Critique Club Critique
(1) COMPOSITION (CONTENT) - Generally very busy for a photo. The title does make me look for the various elements. But I have too much to look for, no one subject to grab me. Your key elements are very spread out.
(2) BACKGROUND â The wall in the back is a good choice. Good color, with no structure to it.
(3) CAMERA WORK ,TECHNICAL â The lighting is too uneven - a little too bright from the right side. The rest of it seems ok. A good choice of aperture, so DOF is good. Looks in focus to me. The cocoon is soft, so might appear out of focus to some.
(4) DIGITAL PROCESSING ,TECHNICAL â no recommended changes
(5) MY OPINION ON THE PHOTO â I think you picked too hard a song title to produce a great picture. You have all the elements present, so technically you have it â it just becomes very busy to look at. You got the âcircle of lifeâ here, but its hard to see it.
Jim msp
|
| 01/13/2003 09:43:19 PM | Skybirdby rcrawfordComment: Critique Club Critique
(1) COMPOSITION (CONTENT) â I really like this capture. Though you got a few negative comments about the bushes (trees) in the lower left, I disagree. I think they help add balance to the overall shot. They also give some perspective that would be missed if they were missing. If they were bright red (or something) Iâd agree â but they are not. I also love the placement of the bird against the sky-cloud boundary.
(2) BACKGROUND â Excellent. Everything to the right could be considered ânegative spaceâ. Well done.
(3) CAMERA WORK ,TECHNICAL â Excellent. Did you use a polarizer?
(4) DIGITAL PROCESSING ,TECHNICAL â No recommended changes.
(5) MY OPINION ON THE PHOTO â I really like this. The colors are great, and the bird is very well placed in the photo.
Jim msp
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/13/2003 09:28:46 PM | I've Got You under My Skinby 'PongComment: Critique Club Critique
(1) COMPOSITION (CONTENT) - Great colors, and the âburrâ works well centered. Assuming itâs a burr (it could be other things), it meets the challenge well.
(2) BACKGROUND â nice complimentary color, and nicely out of focus â good DOF
(3) CAMERA WORK ,TECHNICAL â Main subject is out of focus. A few of the appendages are in focus, though. A smaller aperture would have helped here to get the whole thing in focus. The background is nicely out of focus.
(4) DIGITAL PROCESSING ,TECHNICAL â No recommended changes.
(5) MY OPINION ON THE PHOTO â Since Iâm not really sure what I am looking at, I expect the main subject to be in focus. It is not, and really hurts this. The colors are great though.
Jim msp
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/13/2003 08:56:23 PM | a resolution waiting to be brokenby shedonistComment: Critique Club Critique
(1) COMPOSITION (CONTENT) - The idea of the scale and weight loss is clearly a New Yearâs challenge for many people. However, this is a photo with everything âcenteredâ (feet & scale). This tends to make it uninteresting. I donât think B&W helps.
(2) BACKGROUND â OK. The floor does not distract from the photo.
(3) CAMERA WORK ,TECHNICAL â Good. Iâm not sure that B&W is the best format for this. There is really not a lot of contrast; certainly no mood in evidence.
(4) DIGITAL PROCESSING ,TECHNICAL â Nothing to suggest. Everything looks fine.
(5) MY OPINION ON THE PHOTO â A good symbolic photo, but doesnât draw me in. I canât say that it gives me a lot more than a âgood shotâ feeling. On the other hand, I donât have any great suggestions as to how to modify it. I donât think color would change my opinion a lot. Maybe if you added a âGoal = 175â paste on sign.
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/13/2003 08:54:34 PM | |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/21/2025 04:51:31 AM EDT.
|