Image |
Comment |
| 01/15/2008 06:13:46 PM |
Confused clownby t3nchiComment: image is too dark, lighting is a bit weird, i dont get the title, slightly out of focus/motion blurred (cant tell which) and the composition is a bit unsettling. "Confused viewer"
Just putting down some thoughts to help you in what must be a low scoring entry. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/15/2008 06:11:26 PM |
sigh... I wish he'd stop clowning around...by rdebruynComment: Severe purple fringing let this image down a lot, the quality / clarity isnt there either. I realise these are technical rather than artistic criticisms, but they can both be reduced past the level presented here, if not in postwork but in use of whatever camera you have. Nice out of the box concept but doesnt really say "clown" to me unless you read the title which is infact an idiom, so is only related to clowns in an abstract manner anyway. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/15/2008 06:06:39 PM |
Dreams of Clownhoodby jaysonmcComment: I get the connection, but just a bit too far out of the box to make a strong case - not saying dnmc because it isnt, it just isnt far enough into the challenge, plus although the image is ok compositionally it just looks unimpressive. Noise, tilt and drab colour scheme adds to that.
Just trying to be helpful on an image i didnt score to well. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/07/2008 11:06:32 AM |
Flameby RoosterComment: haha - very cool.. i like it. Might have been good to get more definition on the base of the flame / inclusion of the wick somehow. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/07/2008 11:05:08 AM |
Air Traffic Control by hotpastaComment: sweet. shame about the nose being cropped off the final one, but still a great image and use of the technique. Tho i suppose you couldnt hang around too much taking shots on the airport boundaries, hehe. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/07/2008 11:03:49 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/07/2008 11:02:57 AM |
quack quack by Rando D300Comment: hehe - cute shot. The face seems a bit posterised/weird in colours. almost as if you recovered the highlights too much. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/07/2008 11:00:32 AM |
|
| 01/07/2008 10:59:58 AM |
bloopby ralphComment: Another one in which it has to be one image... show me a camera which can take these extremely quick images in succession and i'll say this cant be DQ'd on the basis that it is either non-sequential images put together, or one image using strobing (which according to the details is not time-lapse as it specifies "one image"). Just making a point here that i hope will be ironed out in future. Nice image anyway. |
| 01/07/2008 10:54:48 AM |
The Many Arms of my Beloved...by jodis_evaComment: For continuity sake i hope this gets DQ'd, i have no problem with the entry - i think it is rather good actually - but the SC was saying that "posed" time lapse which wasnt natural movement does not qualify as time-lapse... |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 06/10/2025 05:18:28 AM EDT.