Image |
Comment |
| 11/14/2012 01:24:29 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 11/09/2012 11:07:26 AM |
Shop Talkby Yo_SpiffComment: Real and soulful. Congrats on the tt. It's well deserved. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 09/07/2011 08:10:58 PM |
Gotcha by william88Comment: Originally posted by hahn23: 1/125s according to the image data. I assume that is a data entry error, right? If so, then big congratulations on the Blue ribbon. |
He used flashes. There's no way possible to freeze the action like this with shutter speed alone.
William, fantastic! I didn't vote, but you'd get a 10 from me. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 07/11/2011 03:27:57 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/08/2011 03:44:07 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 10/18/2010 07:38:25 PM |
The Star Gazerby vawendyComment: The shot is basically good, but I agree with what the others have said about the exposure time and the star trails, and the comment about maybe using a wide angle lens and getting in a lot closer to the guy, so that he has more of the frame, but there is still lots of sky.
The thing that I would add, though, has to do with the white balance. The sky is really orange, and the guy is really purple. Neither color is very natural looking. I think what I'd do is to put an orange gel on the flash, to match the orangeness of the sky (or possibly go even a little more orange than the sky), then compensate for the orange color with white balance. The idea is to get the sky a nice normal nighttime color (or at least what we imagine to be normal), and have the guy maybe a little warmer. It might take some experimentation to get it right. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/23/2010 10:45:30 PM |
At peaceby LalliSigComment: Wow. I had to stop and think about this one for awhile. Isn't that the definition of art? |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/23/2010 10:41:14 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/08/2010 06:53:38 PM |
Solitude in Stiltsvilleby yakatmeComment: hmmmm...in response to your thread....I think your edit is not far off from what I would have done, which is why I don't enter many landscapes. I don't know what to do with them. Looking at Neil and Bear's edits of your original, I personally think they're both better, and bring the image from a 5 to a 6 or 7 for me, mostly because the crop they used is better than what you've done here. The positioning of the house in the frame seems awkward for some reason, maybe too high up in the frame. In the original, it seems less awkward. I think the other thing is the fluorescent pink sky. It's a lovely sky, but the brightness draws my attention away from the house, and makes the house seem kinda drab in contrast.
What you'd do about those things, I haven't a clue. Bear and Neil seem to have it nailed, though. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 12/10/2009 11:24:19 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/11/2025 05:52:06 PM EDT.