purple haze
by roba

Comment:
Hello from the Critique Club,

Congratulations on a very solid score on this image. Your idea for this challenge was very creative. There are a couple of small technical issues that prevented this from making it into the top twenty. First, the composition looks a little unbalanced, as the negative space above the flower is taller than the stem of the flower. I think the square crop might not have been the best choice for this image. Second, your lighting is very effective except for the flashlight you used on the flower. This produced a couple of hot spots that almost look like pollen or something lying on the flower. If you could have found a way to bounce this light or diffuse it somehow, it really would have given you a bit more flexibility in post processing to bring more pop to the purple in the flower.

I really would like to encourage you to revisit this image now that you aren't handcuffed by the basic editing rules. By changing the crop and tweaking the flower, you will have something worthy of hanging on your wall. Nicely done.

Feel free to PM me if you have any questions regarding this critique.

Tim

Aftermath
by morg002

Comment:
Hello from the Critique Club,

I enjoyed reading your comments on how this picture was captured. You did a very effective job at making it look like the image was taken just after it stopped raining. Your post processing work is very good and the compositional arrangement of the table and use of DoF are excellent. So why didn't this score better? It's called the DPC game. Even challenges like rain, where people don't expect to see highly saturated images, the voters look for two things, mood and creativity. Your image doesn't have a lot of "Gee, I wish I had thought of that" to it and that is reflected in the score.

Your understanding of the technical aspects of photography leads me to believe you will score consistently in the sixes once you figure out how to play the game. I'm still working on this myself. Good luck with future challenges.

Feel free to PM me if you have any questions regarding this critique.

Tim

Please God
by zaflabout

Comment:
Hello from the Critique Club,

I remember this image from voting and my first impressions were that it was nice to see a non-flower shot with a strong human element. However, the focus in this image looks a little soft like your failed to sharpen the image after resizing. I would suggest trying Unsharp Mask after resizing. For Paint Shop Pro, the settings I use most are Radius 1, Strength 100, and Clipping 5. If the sharpening effect is too strong (causes pixelation), decrease the strength to between 50 and 75 or decrease to around 30 and sharpen a couple of times.

Feel free to PM me if you have any questions regarding this critique.

Tim

through these eyes
by oneredstar

Comment:
Hello from the Critique Club,

I remember when voting on this image that my first impression was "Very simple idea that was well done". I like the colors and lighting and the eyes on the umbrella are fun to look at. However, this image has a lot of negative space that doesn't really have any purpose. This could have been stronger compositionally if it had been cropped in portrait instead of landscape. Another option would have been to have the person turn slightly to her right so that the umbrella eyes were looking towards the left side of the image. This would have given the negative space on the left purpose (space for the eyes to look off into) and turned the dark area on the ground into a secondary focal point instead of a distraction (the eyes could have been looking towards that spot).

Tim

Take my breath away
by scaramanga

Comment:
Hello from the Critique Club,

Ok, what am I supposed to say to a ribbon winner? I know, congratulations! Looking at your other challenge entries, you have great technical skills and a wonderful, creative mind. This image connected with the voters and won a ribbon. Once you get into the upper 6's for a score, the final outcome is related more to how the voters like your image more than how good the technical are. Congratulations again.

Tim

Sad hot lazy dead or dying in silent pool of tears Bear
by unknowndeath

Comment:
Hello from the Critique Club,

My first impression when I voted on this image was "Ok, it's a nice snapshot of a polar bear and maybe it just finished raining, as the cement is wet". However, after reading your title I realized that your image was trying to convey something on a much deeper level than just a polar bear shoehorned into a rain challenge. The trouble is your message isn't delivered very strongly because the focal point of the message, the bear's eyes, are not sharply in focus. Added on top of this is the reality that metaphorical images often score low, as the metaphors don't always translate well to an international audience. After looking at your profile page, I'm willing to bet that you don't really care about the score, as photography is just the media you use to express yourself and I felt a very strong poetic connection while looking at your images.

Your style is definitely unique and I'm glad you feel comfortable expressing yourself at DPC. Feel free to PM me if you have any questions regarding this critique.

Tim

Sea of Ruffles
by collie65

Comment:
Hello from the Critique Club,

There is no doubt that this image meets the challenge, as it is about as purple as purple can get. So why did it score so low? Primarily because the image has no real focal point to hold the viewer's attention. With the frame almost entirely consisting of the same color and shapes, the eye naturally goes to the upper left hand corner of the image to find something that is different. One way to add a focal point in an image like this is to have one particular flower in sharp focus while the other are blurred (And don't forget the rule of thirds when doing this). You would probably need to use the macro mode on your camera to achieve this effect.

Besides this compositional issue with your entry, there are a couple of technical / post processing things that could be improved. The image really doesn't have any area that is sharply focused. My guess is that you did not sharpen this image after you downsized it for the challenge. Most people use USM (Unsharp Mask) or a light-sharpening step after they downsize. You made the right decision to shoot these flowers in the shade, as it is very easy to get blown highlights off the pedals if shot in bright sun. However when shot in the shade, a little post processing work is required to get the pop back in the colors. This can be achieved using levels and contrast or with curves. The easiest method would be to increase the gamma in levels (the middle slider) then increase the contrast and decrease the brightness.

Feel free to PM me if you have any questions regarding this critique or the post processing methods discussed.

Tim

Tethered
by kawesttex

Comment:
Hello from the Critique Club,

There is no doubt that this image meets the challenge and your rotation and crop to put the strings leading from the corner made for a stronger leading line impact and helped this image break into the 6 scoring range. However, there is considerable pixelation in the strings and some movement visible as well (as you noted yourself in your comments). I think the image could have used just a bit more saturation for the sky (bump the blue color saturation only).

Your score probably suffered some from the standpoint that your leading lines were basically horizontal and didn't have a lot of depth to them. If you look at the top 10 images for this challenge, the voters seemed to like the images where the leading lines went deep into the image the most. All in all, the colors of the kite gave this image a different look to it and helped you achieve that coveted 6+ score. Congratulations!

Feel free to PM me if you have any questions regarding this critique.

Tim

Macquarie Lighthouse
by niallg

Comment:
Hello from the Critique Club,

The exposure of this image looks pretty good. The image could use a bit more post processing work to give it more pop. Two suggestions for post processing, first, play around with levels or curves to increase the dynamic range of the image (give the image more contrast and color saturation). After that, boost the color saturation a bit more using Hue/Saturation.

You might also consider cropping just a little off the right side of the image, up to the trees on the right. This will remove the part of the fence that leads to the right edge of the image, thus forcing the viewer's eyes back to the main subject. As is, the fence leads both to the lighthouse and away from the lighthouse and forces the viewer to choose which way to look, which weakens the leading lines aspect of the image.

My final suggestion would be to sharpen the image a little bit more than you did after resizing. It is hard to find a sharply focused area in the image and that generally means that the sharpness was lost during resizing.

I think you found a very strong subject for the leading lines challenge. I really like how the fence takes your eyes to one side of the image then back to the other side to the main subject. A bit more post processing work and this image could have scored in the sixes.

Feel free to PM me if you have any questions regarding this critique.

Tim

Fire Hazard
by EssAreDubya

Comment:
Hello from the Critique Club,

Technicals: The exposure of this image is exceptional. I would have never guessed that so much detail could be captured shooting straight into a light bulb. Although the cropping of this image puts the main subject dead center, I think it works for this image. The reason being is that my eye knows there is more to the lamp then what is visible and it automatically draws in an outline of what might be there. Sort of like an implied leading line for the lamp.

Voter Appeal: The humor here is very good but just a bit subtle for the general DPC voter. I think your score suffered just a bit as any voter that didn't take the time to read everything in this image would have scored it as average or lower for being just a lamp. To be truthful, my eye was first drawn to the 120 V part of the light bulb and I had to search quite a bit to find the 75 W part of the image.

This image connects with me humor wise and I thank you for bringing a smile to my face.

Feel free to PM me if you have any questions regarding this critique.

Tim