Image |
Comment |
| 05/05/2005 12:04:07 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/05/2005 12:00:50 AM |
Illuminated Sculptureby dkubinComment: Ah, finally a use for modern art: spicing up an otherwise ordinary photograph!
Interesting imagery, but somewhat soft. Blown highlights are a little harsh. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/04/2005 11:59:20 PM |
Canberra at nightby MattBComment: This joke was funny the first time I saw it 20 years ago. It's gotten very old since then. |
| 05/04/2005 11:56:37 PM |
Late night sailingby gthbComment: I see a sun in the sky, and no icebergs to indicate that you're in the arctic circle, thus I must conclude that this was not taken late at night. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/04/2005 11:55:30 PM |
County Courthouseby BudComment: Surreal, slanted, with overdone light flares, but strangely attractive regardless. I particularly like the way the blue in the windows matches the sky. The visible noise mars the image slightly. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/04/2005 02:05:04 AM |
Lights on the Hudsonby slingshotComment: What looks like sideways motion blur and a much smaller number of lights makes this much inferior to the other version I've seen submitted, even though I like getting a little blue on the water instead of black. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/04/2005 02:03:51 AM |
Cobalt Bay Bridgeby snackwellsComment: Very striking colors, and for the first time, I see star flare that works, being a single enhancing light. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/04/2005 02:02:25 AM |
Secrets At Midnightby rubytuesdaiComment: Conceptually, this is an interesting shot. I like the idea of late night writing. Unfortunately, it doesn't convey any sense of possibly being outside (on cloth, it implies being found in a bedroom, the way that it is), which violates the challenge constraints. Also, focus is very soft (intentional? it works ont he pen, but not on the paper), and the blown highlights on the candle combine with the lens flare to really hurt the image. Colors are also a little off, seeming a bit too reddish to me. If this were advanced editing, I would have recommended blending multiple shots to get both the candle and the book. With basic, the most I can recommend is underexposing this, and then dumping contrast and boosting shadows to see if you could get the book back up. Correcting the flare probably requires buying a better lens. If you could have found a tree stump or porch chair to set this on, that might have helped with the "outside" aspect. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/04/2005 01:47:44 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/04/2005 01:45:44 AM |
Beltainby scoulhComment: In honor of John of Iverkething? At the northerly latitudes where this originates, even the lewd aspects are unlikely to approach full nudity -- it's just too damn cold. No points deducted for that, however.
I wish the shadows were slightly lighter, since I can see the arms of a figure in the center, but can't really make out the rest. I do like the face being lost into shadow on the right, and the smoke in the background. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/19/2025 07:01:09 AM EDT.