Goodbye Blue Sky
by jjbeguin

Comment:
I'm confused about the black on the righthand side. Also, the darks are very dark and you lose definition towards the bottom of the stairs, which may have been what you were going for, but since you can see detail again beyond that point it wasn't all that effective. If you were implying loss of detail as you go down it might have been best to crop while in the dark part at the bottom.

And through the window in the wall ... (Echoes)
by Balko

Comment:
This image appears tilted - it would have been better if it had been straight.

"Another Brick In The Wall" - The Wall
by orvaratli

Comment:
This might have been more effective with less of the building on the right - the flare there is distracting.

the lunatic is in your head
by omikeo

Comment:
Out of focus, noise.

The lunatic is in my head!
by graphicfunk

Comment:
I like the idea a lot, however, I find the shirt/sweatshirt to be a distracting outfit choice - better to just do a plain (maybe ripped) t-shirt. Also, I'm not sure how you made the light patterns, but they're overlapping with the model and despite the name, it's very unclear at first glance that the black is a head shape.

"Flaming" 1967
by snaeland

Comment:
A little too dark - or at least, contrast is too high. It's a problem with flames.

...two lost souls Swimming in a fishbowl...
by xianart

Comment:
I like this idea, but I think it would have been more effective with a different backdrop and if you could have seen more of the fishbowl. There are also distracting dots, maybe bubbles, in the foreground and droplets of water inside the top of the bowl.

Careful With That Axe, Eugene
by Vpphoto

Comment:
Highlights are blown. I would also have had the guy tip his head up a bit more so you could see his second eye a bit.

Money - Pink Floyd
by rcatalano

Comment:
Would have been more effective with newer, crisper money, IMO.

Saucer Full Of Secrets
by Man_Called_Horse

Comment:
I don't like the extremely shallow DOF.