Glacier National Park
by mbrutus2009

Comment by Silent-Shooter:
Nice capture but it is way too dark for me

Glacier National Park
by mbrutus2009

Comment by Ja-9:
to me this seems to have a little camera shake...did you click this yourself or use a trigger? just curious

Glacier National Park
by mbrutus2009

Comment by hotpasta:
it's ok, but a the exposure doesn't quite work....the water looks nice, but the other parts look quite dark

056 copy
by mbrutus2009

Comment by bksullivan:
The lighting on her hair looks great! I think a little more light on his face would have made this portrait 'pop' a little more, but overall this is an excellent photo

075 copy
by mbrutus2009

Comment by bksullivan:
Their faces are too orange. If you look at her chest compared with her face, it's very obvious

087 copy
by mbrutus2009

Comment by bksullivan:
BEAUTITUL... you nailed this picture

102 copy
by mbrutus2009

Comment by bksullivan:
Teeth are WAAAAY too bright!! otherwise, a very good portrait!

102 copy
by mbrutus2009

Comment by dahlin:
I think the rest of them are really good considering what you had to work with. This one is a little flat for me. And it looks like you took advantage of the shade under the tree, so the conditions weren't awful. Did you use a fill flash? If not, that may have helped.

I agree with Kelli's comment on this one. The teeth are too bright for the rest of the shot. I think I'd dodge the faces a bit too. They're a little on the gray side. If you look at the next b&w shot, the light to dark contrast of the faces is much better and brings out their faces better. If this was a b&w conversion, you can probably bring up the brightness of the skin tones with the red and yellow channels instead of dodging.

087 copy
by mbrutus2009

Comment by emorgan49:
this is my favorite. Which is their favorite?

Mile Marker 52
by mbrutus2009

Comment by Dr.Confuser:
Under appreciated IMHO. Wonderful photo with a high degree of difficulty.