| Image |
Comment |
| 07/11/2008 09:23:55 PM |
golden fieldby david_cComment by cujee: for some reason it doesn't say that Photomatix is illegal, but I remember they made an announcement saying it was and stuff. |
 Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 07/09/2008 04:55:50 PM |
golden fieldby david_cComment by david_c: It is? I'm positive I've seen processing details for basic entries that include single RAW files processed in Photomatix.
That would be problematic, since I self-DQ'ed a couple of challenges ago. :-(
edit: I'm not seeing anything in the Basic rules that would indicate Photomatix is prohibited. ??
Originally posted by bassbone:
This shot is great and I am happy it scored so well. But, do you realize that Photomatix Pro is illegal in basic? It is unfortunate becuase Photomatix pro does much the same as Shadows/Highlights does in PS for a single image and shadows/ highlights are allowed in basic...strange huh? |
Message edited by author 2008-07-09 17:00:24. |
| 07/09/2008 09:39:27 AM |
golden fieldby david_cComment by bassbone: This shot is great and I am happy it scored so well. But, do you realize that Photomatix Pro is illegal in basic? It is unfortunate becuase Photomatix pro does much the same as Shadows/Highlights does in PS for a single image and shadows/ highlights are allowed in basic...strange huh?
Originally posted by david_c:
Originally posted by echoman:
is that sky natural? looks like you darkened parts. |
Yep, it is. The RAW file was converted to DNG, and the DNG was tone-mapped in Photomatix. The "curves" adjustment in Photoshop brought out the sky. Of course, that left the foreground painfully over-staurated. :-( |
Message edited by author 2008-07-09 09:42:31. |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 07/09/2008 09:35:28 AM |
golden fieldby david_cComment by david_c: Originally posted by echoman:
is that sky natural? looks like you darkened parts. |
Yep, it is. The RAW file was converted to DNG, and the DNG was tone-mapped in Photomatix. The "curves" adjustment in Photoshop brought out the sky. Of course, that left the foreground painfully over-staurated. :-( |
| 07/08/2008 11:29:28 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 07/08/2008 04:41:16 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 07/08/2008 01:31:50 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 07/06/2008 09:53:29 AM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 07/05/2008 01:16:52 PM |
golden fieldby david_cComment by bassbone: the pot of gold can't be far away - the deepness of the golden yellow grasses to offset the blues of the sky really work together |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 07/04/2008 06:08:25 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/02/2025 09:17:07 PM EDT.
