Image |
Comment |
| 04/11/2010 03:56:02 AM |
PaW2010 Week 14.jpgby TerComment by Ter: thanks a lot for the comments on the color issue
i will definately use the save for web function now
great explanation David and thanks again Message edited by author 2010-04-11 03:57:16. |
| 04/10/2010 04:11:48 PM |
PaW2010 Week 14.jpgby TerComment by davidw: Ter,
When I examined the image info, it says that it was saved in color space AdobeRGB. I'm not an expert at this, but I know that images for the web need to use color space sRGB. In the save for web dialog in photoshop, there's a check-box for this. It might work better to do this conversion earlier in the process (before you resize for the web) but you'll have to play with that. There have been a bunch of threads about this type of color management, and how different browsers handle the color management in different ways, but I know you have to get the file into sRGB to have any hope.
I hope this helps...
BTW,this is a going to be really impressive with more color. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 04/10/2010 11:01:13 AM |
PaW2010 Week 14.jpgby TerComment by PennyStreet: My recent free study entry did this to me when I did save for web. It still looks saturated enough but it lost it's "punch". So I know what you mean but I can't tell you how to fix it.
As for this photo, I love the dramatic looking sky and all the street lines kind of rolling up and down and around. Nice job! |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 04/09/2010 07:53:42 AM |
PaW2010 Week 14.jpgby TerComment by kellymk: Beautiful sky and great composition! I have experienced a similar problem, but for me the problem occurs when I 'save for web' - suddenly all the richness is sucked out. The only way I have been able to get around this is to bang on a hue/saturation layer and oversaturate the image before saving for web, so that when it 'save for web' reduces it, it is back to the correct visual level. I have found this has solved my problem, as I think that is where it all goes wrong, rather than on the site perhaps? Give it a go? |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 04/09/2010 03:33:40 AM |
PaW2010 Week 14.jpgby TerComment by Ter: thanks for the comments
what i was refering to was when processed in CS4 it appears richer than the uploaded image to the site
was this a common occurrence to others? |
| 04/09/2010 03:30:07 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 04/09/2010 02:52:13 AM |
PaW 2010 Week 13by TerComment by nivlek: i like the depth of field also along with the clarity and colors ... good lighting for melbourne ;) |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 04/09/2010 02:03:36 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 04/09/2010 01:15:55 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 04/08/2010 11:37:37 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/20/2025 05:33:18 AM EDT.