Spring
by thatguy

Comment by daxo:
a little more contrast would be nice.
I also wonder if the extra noise was intentional.
:)

Spring
by thatguy

Comment by cvhs99:
This looks A LOT like a photo I took.......

Spring
by thatguy

Comment by Swashbuckler:
Pretty flowers. For the most part, it's a nice photo, well framed and seems pretty much in subject focus. I see some jpeg artifacts (mostly on the right side) and a bit of color abberance (look closely at the middle branches - see the color isn't consistant?) If this started as a huge image, scaled down to size - you might want to try smaller increments, say 10% at a time, instead of all in one large jump (say 2000x1500 directly to 640x480, try going in small steps). If this is only from JPEG compression, try to not go below an 8 in JPEG quality (in Photoshop).
6 Swash

Spring
by thatguy

Comment by tecent642:
pretty, very pretty. dogwood?????

Spring
by thatguy

Comment by DennisF:
I like the composition. The resolution and focus distract from a potentially good image.

Spring
by thatguy

Comment by Kaz:
This looks really pixelated on my moniter.

Spring
by thatguy

Comment by kiwiness:
Why do you have such nice colorful flowers? It's not fair, spring is late this year here :-) There are signs of artefacting here, but otherwise a good spring flower photo!

Spring
by thatguy

Comment by e301:
all those artefacts are such a shame - given that that is presumably a camera thing, I think this is probably a very good shot. I'm afraid it'll never do well here because of those though.

Spring
by thatguy

Comment by K-Rob:
This picture suffers from a large amount of .jpg compression artifatcs unfortunately. But that's not a problem of the photographer. I'll look beyond that and say that this is a very nice photo. - 7

Spring
by thatguy

Comment by Rocmon2000:
Grainy