|
|
Comments Received by Nicht
| Image |
Comment |
| 01/29/2026 04:00:59 PM | |
| 01/27/2026 12:28:03 PM | Long time ago in a galaxy far far away...there was a spiderby NichtComment by lovemelvin: I got more clarification in the forum
Originally posted by lovemelvin: Unfortunate that that this was disqualified... I congratulated the current blue winner and also sad that he has limited front page exposure. Without discounting others, your image stands out.
I am still confused why this was disqualified.. I looked up on the filetype .fits and it says: "a .fits (Flexible Image Transport System) file is a type of raw data file, often considered a "Super RAW" in astrophotography, as it stores the direct, unprocessed data from a camera sensor. Unlike standard image files, FITS files contain high bit-depth (8 to 64-bit) data and detailed metadata (camera temperature, exposure, etc.), requiring specialized, non-standard imaging software to open and process.
Could someone please clarify what the disqualification was based on..was it because the file was .FITS (not an accepted RAW format for this competition), or specifically because of concerns about editability/processing?
Thank you for clarifying. |
|
| 01/27/2026 09:28:12 AM | Long time ago in a galaxy far far away...there was a spiderby NichtComment by lovemelvin: Unfortunate that that this was disqualified... I congratulated the current blue winner and also sad that he has limited front page exposure. Without discounting others, your image stands out.
I am still confused why this was disqualified.. I looked up on the filetype .fits and it says: "a .fits (Flexible Image Transport System) file is a type of raw data file, often considered a "Super RAW" in astrophotography, as it stores the direct, unprocessed data from a camera sensor. Unlike standard image files, FITS files contain high bit-depth (8 to 64-bit) data and detailed metadata (camera temperature, exposure, etc.), requiring specialized, non-standard imaging software to open and process.
Could someone please clarify what the disqualification was based on..was it because the file was .FITS (not an accepted RAW format for this competition), or specifically because of concerns about editability/processing?
Thank you for clarifying. |
| 01/27/2026 01:13:35 AM | |
| 01/26/2026 02:30:55 AM | |
| 01/25/2026 09:25:56 PM | Long time ago in a galaxy far far away...there was a spiderby NichtComment by kanaj: I understand and support the SC's decision. But I wanted to add a personal note of congratulations for a stellar image. Pun intended. This is first-rate astrophotography, and as one who is more often than not bored by such images (I know, I know...), I hope that registers as a huge compliment. :-D |
| 01/23/2026 05:40:14 PM | |
| 01/22/2026 02:47:50 AM | Long time ago in a galaxy far far away...there was a spiderby NichtComment by Nicht: Thank you!
For the colour I did more or less half the time with each filter, but in sequences of 3-minute exposures. Oiii is a teal colour and H-alpha is quite a deep red. The images are stacked to reduce noise and increase signal, and the final image can then be stretched with the histogram to bring out the detail.
To combine the two stacks, I use the following equations:
Red = Ha
Green = ((Oiii*Ha)^~(Oiii*Ha))*Ha + ~((Oiii*Ha)^~(Oiii*Ha))*Oiii
Blue = Oiii
Using filters helps to cut through the light pollution. I prefer a mono camera as well - for colour cameras there are filters which combine the different wavelengths, but you only get a portion of each pixel per colour. With mono you have the entire pixel to capture photons for a particular filter. |
| 01/21/2026 01:22:17 PM | |
| 01/21/2026 08:34:21 AM | |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2026 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/30/2026 05:17:46 AM EDT.
|