spookykid
by posthumous

Comment by bvlindalou:
you could have use shuttergoat also. funny

spookykid
by posthumous

Comment by Charlene:
Wonderfully processed, great find.

spookykid
by posthumous

Comment by Alicia:
I love this photo - so far, my only 10. I may have to fav it, too.

spookykid
by posthumous

Comment by Jutilda:
Love this. There is another goat shot similar to this that I like as well. Great tones and composition.

Flying
by posthumous

Comment by PGerst:
** Hello from the Critique Club **

Composition
When this image first loaded on my screen I saw primarily the top white portion of the photo. Then, as I scrolled down and saw more of the flower, the compositional feel changed dramatically. This was a result of a square crop which really helped the photo out the most. The nicest part of this composition, and what really sets this from many others is that the image is not static; its not just a photo of a flower. Rather, there is distinct motion as petals (or pollen?) are floating around the flower. This really adds a sense of tranquility to the photo. The flower is nicely isolated from the background. I think a horizontal crop may have worked better with more open space to the left.

Technical
The focus is sharp; the 4.0 aperture was definitely a good choice. There is the right amount of DOF to isolate the flower, but still have enough of the foreground elements in focus. The black and white conversion really works with this photo as this photo has elements in almost all zones. The main problem, and what probably brought the score down, was the white negative space on the top. It really doesn't add to the photo and distracts from the central composition.

side walkin'
by posthumous

Comment by macrothing:


Critique Club Critique

First Impressions
Unusual effect and capture of life in color. The power/telephone line catches my eye.

Photograph Information, Technicals & Composition Review
The composition is quite sound and I don't mind the slight skew. The strange effect of the man, who almost appears to be shuffling along, is enhanced by the house in better focus in the rear. The power/telephone line at first detracts, but grows after a while, but not too much for me. The ivy/vine growing up it enhances that 'element growth' in the image.

A "drive-by shooting", well yes, it does look like that, but I think you've pp'd it to give a unique feel enough that it doesn't seem snapshottish. The feel from the pp is a little 'dark', but the contrasting 'bright blue sky' balances it out. Would like to have seen a little more context, or even a different vantage point giving more interest in the depth and rear.

Comments, Score & Placement Review
130/135 and a score of 4.02 probably doesn't surprise you. I know you submit images that appeal to you and that is the creative key.

You have to like the honesty in comments during anonymous voting.

Summary
It has some interest for me as the viewer, but once my mind absorbs it for what it is (suburban scene, old man shuffling down street), I'm ready to move on from it. That said, this is your artistic vision and outlet, but you obviously like the feedback on it - so now you have mine for this image.

side walkin'
by posthumous

Comment by vawendy:
I love that you mix things up. My own photography is still pretty much plain-old, normal stuff. But TS and others are giving me more of an appreciation of out-of-the-box photography. I've had fun experimenting more and enjoy many more photos than I used to.

That being said, the wire is distracting :D

side walkin'
by posthumous

Comment by cutout:
was there a box?

side walkin'
by posthumous

Comment by JunieMoon:
Very blurry. Kind of doesn't do the concept justice.

Flying
by posthumous

Comment by Melethia:
Congrats to Karen, and thanks for sharing her poem with the rest of us. The two photos make a wonderful pair.

Holy crap. I just looked at the score. That is beyond the usual "wrongness" that DPC can serve up. Seriously, that really irritates me.