¿Icono o fetish?
by catpixel

Comment by NeonSpirit:
Very distracting window reflections

¿Icono o fetish?
by catpixel

Comment by Karl:
pity about the reflections, they kind of takes your interest away from the subject.

¿Icono o fetish?
by catpixel

Comment by crabappl3:
Reflection in the window is sort of distracting. Perhaps a tighter crop on the subject would help too.

Gopher's View
by catpixel

Comment by PTLParsons:
Good shot. Love the wall. It turned out beautiful. But Illusion? Where? I don't understand what the little purple, white, and yellow flags are supposed to be.

Gopher's View
by catpixel

Comment by emorgan49:
what is the gopher looking at? origami ? or do you have some kind of mini kite flower i've never heard of?

Gopher's View
by catpixel

Comment by inspzil:
I guess I'm not seeing it, or I am seeing it and am wondering if it is what I think it is. Either way, I don't really like the photo. - Good luck anyway - Inspzil

Gopher's View
by catpixel

Comment by Gekker:
I get the title and all, but how can this be interpreted as an illusion? Also leaves in front being out of focus is distracting.

Gopher's View
by catpixel

Comment by Swashbuckler:
????? The illusion is .... the viewer is a gopher? Help! 6 Swash

Gopher's View
by catpixel

Comment by Paige:
interesting shot, like the color combination.

While you were sleeping...
by catpixel

Comment by catpixel:
I deliberately wanted to use lighting to create an atmosphere of mystery replicating a child's room at twilight. The cars are first edition hotwheels from the mid-sixties, so they have unorthadox profiles, which apparently threw people off. Are they cars or spaceships? The idea of the title is derived from the mysterious appearence toys take on, in the mind of an imaginative child, when the lights go off, hence "while you were sleeping." Was that really so hard?
Maybe I should have titled it "Toy cars in the dark" for drfmelanogaster and hedonist et al's benefit.