Pollution of our Harbor
by johnmk

Comment by justine:
Nice impact shot. Only thing I'd say is that the crop is poor. The bottom is not even and there is too much at the top. Over all this is a good on topic shot!! Jusitne

Pollution of our Harbor
by johnmk

Comment by kandyj:
this makes a statement to me.

Technology and Art: Moscow Metro
by johnmk

Comment by Marsha:
Interesting approach. Photo seems to be leaning to the left. Next time maybe you could straighten in an editing program.

Technology and Art: Moscow Metro
by johnmk

Comment by PTLParsons:
If you're talking about the metro that moves you underground...that is way long ago technology. It sacred the...out of me. 200 miles an hour, shaking side to side, lights going out. You can have it.. As for the picture whatever the light reflections or shadows from the man, under the statue, under the looks like arrows and between them is odd. I would have cropped out the dark object on the right. It is out of focus and useless to the picture. You still would've gotten the arc and the man. Besides that way both sides of your picture would have been partial arcs. Other wise good picture. PTL

Technology and Art: Moscow Metro
by johnmk

Comment by f-32:
Love the 'ghost feet in the center area, however the guy in the bluejeans looks like he's in the men's room. It distracted me. Sorry.

Technology and Art: Moscow Metro
by johnmk

Comment by Gekker:
I think that framing this differently would have greatly improved the image and the impact of it. It is definitly a neat idea for the challenge.

Technology and Art: Moscow Metro
by johnmk

Comment by andrewm:
Wonderful photo--and what a great metro system--andrewm

Technology and Art: Moscow Metro
by johnmk

Comment by niho:
Where's the train??If you caught one it would have been much better.And whoose leg is that!?

Technology and Art: Moscow Metro
by johnmk

Comment by catpixel:
Very interesting. Makes NY subways look bad.

Technology and Art: Moscow Metro
by johnmk

Comment by Turbotech:
Ok. Where is the technology here?