Untitled
by cmcvety

Comment by Journey:
7Journey

Untitled
by cmcvety

Comment by marcvg:
The conclusion I draw is that it's lucky for aubergines that they don't have legs :-)

Untitled
by cmcvety

Comment by sjgleah:
The eggplant w/o the guy might have been more interesting. Not sure I get the message here. 5 sjgleah

Untitled
by cmcvety

Comment by CPattee:
I don't get it but it's cute. I'm torn on the lighting. I like the way the subjects are lit but I don't like how blotching(best word I can think of) the walls look with the low light.

Untitled
by cmcvety

Comment by cq107:
lighting is good, except that I see reflection on the chair and the fruit. I also don't have a taste for this sort of subjectmatter. Perhaps if you were to have a nude woman....

Untitled
by cmcvety

Comment by amonteforte:
This is a hard image to assimilate and understand. I donĂ¢€™t feel I was able to get the message, but I believe it's there. I think it's deserving and interesting. I price the effort to do something unique and deep. I don't think people here will get it, since they have shown to be very uneasy with what they don't understand. I am sure a simple well executed photo of a pretty and colorful fruit will win. I would be very interested in learning your vision for this rendering.

Untitled
by cmcvety

Comment by myqyl:
There might be some kind of 'high art' thing happening here, but I don't see it. The composition is strained at best, and the lighting seems very strange. The subject matter is also just plain confussing. What is this suppose to be a picture of?

Untitled
by cmcvety

Comment by scw1217:
Do NOT understand this shot.

Untitled
by cmcvety

Comment by chrisab:
I'm not sure I understand this image, but I'm pretty sure I don't want to! hah. 1 for meeting the challenge plus 2 for making some connection between naked and eggplant equals 3.

Untitled
by cmcvety

Comment by bamaster:
I am sad to say I do not like this shot. The message is not clear to me and while I prefer "alternative" scenes, this one appears artsy for the sake of artsiness. The lighting appears shallow while parts of the foreground chair are bright. Maybe I'm just confused???