derriere
by grigrigirl

Comment by EL-ROI:
This looks somewhat underexposed. Maybe it's just not focused well.

derriere
by grigrigirl

Comment by Natator:
Very nice. This was the shot I was going to do but never found the time. Love it, it is the most sensual curve there is.

derriere
by grigrigirl

Comment by hughletheren:
Looked good as a thumbnail - maybe the texture/lighting isn't quite right - but a nice idea.

eau de toilette
by grigrigirl

Comment by cmangis:
Sorry, but I'm confused by this; clearly, there's a concept, but it's evading me. Is she trying to escape the smell?

eau de toilette
by grigrigirl

Comment by kinks:
I hope, you did not put the girl there because of smell of feet. What ever, feet are on this picture in the most important place and i like bad jokes - 9

eau de toilette
by grigrigirl

Comment by space amoeba:
It's a really cool shot. I love the angle, but this doesn't convey any scent per se... without the title, I wouldn't have put it under the challenege. 6 for terrific composition.

eau de toilette
by grigrigirl

Comment by Dave Gordon:
What's she doing way up there? Interesting shot, pretty model, but it doesn't make much sense.

eau de toilette
by grigrigirl

Comment by vrphotos:
Beautiful girl, in the oddest spot, in an even odder pose.... nice tones

eau de toilette
by grigrigirl

Comment by Azrifel:
I like the technical quality of this photo. It is well composed, sharp troughout (wide aperture would probably not help this pose), excellent exposure, good b&w toning.
But I just don't get her pose, too much upper leg area, it makes it look like she has fat upper legs. Perhaps that is true, but I don't consider it very flattering.
Difficult position I guess? :)
Apart from the centre with all that upper leg in it, good photo. 8

eau de toilette
by grigrigirl

Comment by pcody:
I have to say this is the most unique one of the bunch. I've been putting it off because I don't know what to say or think. It has an appeal, but it's so unusual. I like the diagonal that the wall forms and the b/w treatment. I guess it's good because it certainly causes one to stop and consider, but instead of thinking about the picture, I'm thinking about the photographer. And the word is why?